The Cat Flaneur

1.6K posts

The Cat Flaneur banner
The Cat Flaneur

The Cat Flaneur

@TheCatFlaneur

le chaton fat. I follow only people who follow me 🇪🇺🇺🇦

Katılım Mart 2023
191 Takip Edilen178 Takipçiler
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
BTC LN donations: lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhky6t5vdhkjmnpdenk2mq5hjss8
Indonesia
1
0
2
258
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
John Gabriel explains the difference between georithmetic and arithmetic:
English
2
5
70
160.8K
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
John Gabriel disagrees with David Hilbert and Descartes. He says that lines are not composed of points and explains that an equation does not describe a line or a curve but enables one to find distances between points.
English
2
0
3
98
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
wuincent
wuincent@1wuincy·
You lowkey gotta larp the lifestyle at first to make it real
English
129
3.4K
33.8K
430.3K
dethective
dethective@dethective·
@64s I think so as well. Sometimes I have to do retarded content since it's the only way to go viral on this shitty platform 😂
English
7
0
80
16.6K
dethective
dethective@dethective·
Some explain me this. > Fresh wallet with zero history > The only bet: Spain not winning against Cabo Verde 8.5 Million profit. Was the game rigged?
dethective tweet media
English
155
62
1.4K
871.9K
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
Jay Chan
Jay Chan@Jay10_6·
This mean students up to Year 11 will not be able to revise GCSE biology on Freesciencelessons YouTube channel. This also mean a 15 years and 364 days old not be able to read Facebook posts from their MP or councillor, but expected to vote for them tomorrow.
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK

🚨 NEW: Under-16s in the UK will be banned from the following 10 social media apps TikTok YouTube Snapchat Instagram X Reddit Facebook Twitch Kick Threads

English
364
3.6K
47.1K
2.1M
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
Kris Puckett
Kris Puckett@krispuckett·
Dario and @AnthropicAI tonight... Nobody will notice a little rename, right?
English
120
193
5.2K
713K
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
Sean Heelan
Sean Heelan@seanhn·
It is a *little* awkward when your CEO is out there complaining people aren’t putting his ideas into law fast enough, yet your own policies can’t survive 24 hours of contact with reality.
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs

We’re rolling out changes to make Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development visible. Starting this week, flagged requests will visibly fall back to Opus 4.8—the same as our safeguards for cyber and bio. You will see this every time it happens. On the API, any flagged requests will return a reason for their refusal (coming to server-side fallback in the next few days). We wanted to deploy Fable 5 to our users quickly and safely. Visible safeguards can be probed, so they have to be robust, which takes time to get right. Invisible safeguards can be targeted more narrowly, allowing us to ship quickly with very few false positives. We went with invisible safeguards for this reason—and that was the wrong tradeoff. You should have visibility into the safeguards we have in place, and why. We’re sorry for not getting the balance right. Making the safeguards visible makes them easier to work around, so keeping them robust to jailbreaks will unfortunately mean more false positives while we improve the classifiers. We're also tuning our bio and cyber classifiers to trigger less often on harmless requests. We know this is frustrating and we’ll do our best to keep this period as short as possible. If you think a request has been mistakenly flagged: run /feedback in Claude Code, click thumbs-down on the fallback in Claude.ai or Cowork, or file the safeguard appeal form for API requests. Your reports help us tune these classifiers and we appreciate your feedback. support.claude.com/en/articles/82…

English
9
38
865
27K
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
Pete
Pete@splendid_pete·
EU sanctions and an entry ban. Now.
Pete tweet mediaPete tweet mediaPete tweet mediaPete tweet media
English
98
808
6.5K
235.3K
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
π = π x 1 means π is measurable by unity and hence a rational number. Follow @CalculusNe75865 for more
Română
1
0
0
3.7K
The European Horizon 🇪🇺
The European Horizon 🇪🇺@europeanhorizon·
🇪🇺🏦 ECB Temporarily Restricts Revolut’s New Product Launches in Europe The ECB has temporarily restricted Revolut from launching new financial products in Europe due to concerns over the speed of its service approvals and rollouts Source: FT
The European Horizon 🇪🇺 tweet media
English
95
41
523
611.3K
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
New Calculus
New Calculus@CalculusNe75865·
π = π x 1 means π is measurable by unity and hence a rational number.
Română
9
1
1
669
The Cat Flaneur retweetledi
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
@RadishHarmers A number is a measure of a magnitude that’s why 0 isn’t a number, it’s not a ratio
The Cat Flaneur tweet media
English
10
1
2
8.1K
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
You’re just swapping the measurand. You're not measuring the bag, you're measuring tomatoes, and a present container doesn't make its contents present. The bag isn't what you're measuring, the tomatoes are. A container being present doesn't make the contents present. An empty bag means no tomatoes there to count, so you're still recording that there are none, not measuring an amount of them.
English
1
0
0
35
Dylan Hoy-Bianchi
Dylan Hoy-Bianchi@BobDylan530·
@TheCatFlaneur @RadishHarmers But also it’s pretty easy to get around your arbitrary conditions by saying that the tomatoes were in a bag, and you’re tracking how many tomatoes are in the bag over the course of selling them, then even when it’s empty you have a physical object to facilitate the measurement
English
1
0
0
65
The Cat Flaneur
The Cat Flaneur@TheCatFlaneur·
Here’s your incorrect way: No magnitude present -> observe there's nothing -> ❌ call observing "measuring" -> treat 0 as the measure -> claim 0 is a number Here’s the correct way: Magnitude present -> lay the unit against it -> count the parts that fit -> that count is the measure -> the measure is the number To measure something is to compare it against a unit and count how many of that unit fit into it, like asking how many times a ruler fits along a length. That only works if there's actually something there to compare, so when nothing is present you're not measuring it and getting zero, you're just noting there was nothing to measure in the first place.
English
1
0
1
45