Sabitlenmiş Tweet

People keep holding on to the 4 year crypto cycle theory no matter what. But think about it..
The 4 years cycle:
Marked 3 out of the 4 tops
That's it. That's enough for people to call it a trend, a cycle, or even a certainty.
Now look at what actually makes sense: the business cycle. First let's see how it makes (more) sense and than look at how is way more accurate than a broken theory.
The ISM going up means businesses ordering products and goods because they and their customers have the money to pay for it. If they can't even affort a new toaster, they're not gonna pump your shitcoins. Now check the correlation.
The business cycle:
Marked 4 out of the 4 tops,
Marked the 2012 Aug crash,
Marked the 2013 April crash,
Marked the 2016 June crash
Marked the altcoin pump Q4 2024,
Had a blow off top in 2011, like BTC
Had a blow off top in 2013, like BTC
Had a blow off top in 2017, like BTC
Was in a distribution phase in 2021, like BTC,
Is now moving slow but steady, like BTC,
Etc, etc..
Yet, people call 3 times on BTC a trend, and a way more accurate correlation with the business cycle that also makes it make sense is a coincidence?
Someone please find someone who might know someone who thinks this makes any sense.
You could say the ISM will never go up again. This is an osccilator for 75 years. Yes. This will go up again. When? That's the question. From it's current level, it took an average of 8 months. So that might be Q3 2026.
What about a bearmarket in the meantime? Worst case ~70k. Bitcoin only goes in bearmarkets when the ISM tanks. How will it tank from this point?
So what makes it go up?
Rats cuts,
No QT.
Check and check. So please stop stressing about a broken trend which means nothing on it's own and start looking at what actually drives this market, which is liquidity, not astrology. If you really still think the 4 year cycle is all there is, I guess it's a you problem

English




















