Hassan

365 posts

Hassan banner
Hassan

Hassan

@TheHassanEffect

I know the view from the penthouse and I know the taste of the pavement. Now I'm proving that 'Game Over' was just a glitch in the loading screen.

Dallas Katılım Şubat 2025
42 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
I love my GPT Pro sub, but the limit resets are a gaslight. Everyone acts like it’s a free refill lol. They’re just resetting the weekly timer. It’s like your boss saying you can have Friday off but you gotta come in to work on Sunday. You just hit the wall sooner next time.
English
0
0
0
3
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
I'm experiencing this issue on 20x Pro sub and it's been happening almost a week now. Essentially unusable. Additionally, for me, 8-10 times now, it goes up to 90-100 minutes of thinking and ends with "thinking failed" on trivial tasks. @OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @sama
Roy@Kingu0613

这两天gpt大规模降智,不知道是风控变严还是vpn波动,具体情况表现为pro模型不思考降智成4o或mini而thinking模式完全正常;plus则是标准思考路由5mini,thinking正常。特殊情况下静置几天会恢复,但恢复后继续降智可能性很高,目前不知道具体是什么原因 #ChatGPT #OpenAI

English
0
0
0
14
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
@qiaohui @OpenAI @ChatGPTapp @sama Yup! I'm experiencing this same issue on Pro subscription 20x and it's been happening for almost a week now. Additionally, for me, 8-10 times now, it goes up to 90-100 minutes of thinking and ends with "thinking failed" on trivial tasks. @OpenAIDevs
English
0
0
0
11
Page Q
Page Q@qiaohui·
Weird ChatGPT web issue with GPT-5.5 Pro / Extended Pro. Fresh chats + manual Pro + Extended briefly show "Pro thinking", then no persistent "Thought for ..."; output quality looks like a fallback/non-reasoning route. Thinking Heavy works normally. @OpenAI @ChatGPTapp @sama @nickaturley @barret_zoph Tried: new sessions, clearing chatgpt.com site data, relogin, disabling Fast answers. Also hit "Message delivery timed out. Please try again." My repro chats: chatgpt.com/c/69f63833-58f… chatgpt.com/c/69f63360-b4e… Similar reports: reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/c… reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/c… reddit.com/r/ChatGPTPro/c…
English
2
0
1
150
Doug Gottlieb
Doug Gottlieb@GottliebShow·
What happens to all my Spirit Airlines Miles?
English
663
35
863
510.5K
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
I never flew Spirit Airlines. And now I never will. But I never wanted to anyways.
English
0
0
1
64
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Did someone break Claude?
English
0
0
4
133
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Devs upload their app. Users stress-test them, report bugs, and earn inference credits. Claude Managed Agents diagnose, write the fix, run the tests, and open a PR. Every successful run is a durable, mergeable artifact - not ephemeral output. 14+ real PRs during the build week.
English
1
0
0
26
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Building with Claude Opus 4.7 this week as part of @claudeai, @claudedevs, and @cerebral_valley's Built with Opus 4.7 hackathon. I built CrowdPatch Community-sourced bugs. AI-shipped fixes. Powered by Claude Managed Agents. Every fix lands as a real GitHub PR.
Hassan tweet media
English
1
0
0
78
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
@OmniC79283 Yup, 100% The "boring ops" stuff is really important. When that stuff has a tighter baseline and better foundation, it makes the more complex stuff go way smoother.
English
0
0
0
21
Omni Comelse
Omni Comelse@OmniC79283·
@TheHassanEffect Same direction here: cleaner refactors matter, but I still judge coding models by boring ops stuff: preserve repo context, recover from bad shell/browser state, and verify the diff without babysitting. xhigh+fast sounds promising there.
English
1
0
1
30
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
I also really love GPT 5.5 in Codex. xhigh+fast is just a killer combination. It's one shotted refactors for me and also is much better at writing cleaner code. I would say like 30-40% better at cleaner code.
English
1
0
1
54
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
I've grown quite fond of Claude Opus 4.7. It's actually quite a great and helpful model. I prefer it now over 4.6. Anyone who dogs on it is not using it correctly. You need to just let it do its thing. Of course, you'll correct things as you go, but it's great for long tasks.
English
0
0
0
27
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
There is a Mythos level AI model dropping later today that will be available to every person in the world day 1 Do you understand what is about to happen? Democratized super intelligence Anyone can create any future they want
English
163
55
1.2K
169.7K
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
This whole subsidization thing, sure they lose some money, but they gain something worth a lot more. User data. Which they use to train new models and sell us the next thing we want since they already know what the demand is. That data is invaluable. And look what it accomplishes? For Anthropic specifically, Mythos-Preview was released and it’s not even available to the general public. I don’t think the prices are going up anytime soon.
English
0
0
0
961
Oren John
Oren John@orenmeetsworld·
Exactly how subsidized are tokens for Claude, Perplexity etc right now? Realistically if we're building workflows dependent on these that are running two $200/m max plans... does this change to... $1000? $5000? More? When?
English
63
1
230
94.8K
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Codex was acting dumber than usual today. This means that a new model release is imminent.
English
0
0
0
15
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
@testingcatalog Have had this on Gpt pro plan for a bit now it’s quite good
English
0
0
0
46
TestingCatalog News 🗞
TestingCatalog News 🗞@testingcatalog·
Anthropic might be preparing to release its Claude Code security feature beyond Enterprise and Team plans. Claude Security will conduct periodic scans of your repositories and report any vulnerabilities it discovers. Max only? 👀
TestingCatalog News 🗞 tweet media
English
20
19
460
45.8K
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Claude Design is pretty awesome. I am not a big fan of Opus 4.7 in Claude Code, but in this new design feature, it's top tier.
English
0
0
0
33
Alex Reiswich
Alex Reiswich@AlexReiswich·
@bridgemindai I really would like to know what kind of prompts you are using. I have built a whole working SaaS within an 6 hour session and have like 25% usage. Opus 4.7 feels a lot faster and really intelligent, even UI is by worlds better than 4.6
English
1
0
0
89
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Claude Opus 4.7 eats tokens for breakfast. 3 prompts. 13% usage. This is why I bought two Max plans. One $200/month subscription would be gone before lunch. The model is the best I've ever used. But you can feel that 35% token increase on every single prompt. Claude Opus 4.7 is not a model you run on a budget.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
53
2
138
8.6K
Hassan
Hassan@TheHassanEffect·
Opus 4.7 output is sometimes weirdly similar to Chat GPT. "you're right to push on this" "if you want, I can do..."
English
0
0
0
25