The Observer
182 posts

The Observer
@TheObserverCap
Nothing on this account is financial advice

$EOS.AX and the Netherlands The Dutch Ministry of Defence published their official project overview last week - Defensie Projectenoverzicht 2026. 162 pages of government procurement and EOS is in there, named explicitly. Translated directly: "The development of a prototype High Energy Laser has been expanded with the development and testing of a low-cost C-UAS self-defence system for integration on various Remote Controlled Weapon Systems. The development of both systems was commissioned in 2025 and 2026 from the Australian EOS. The laser factory where the product is manufactured has opened in Singapore." Three things confirmed in that paragraph; 1 - The Apollo contract has expanded in scope; now includes a low-cost C-UAS system for integration across multiple Dutch RWS platforms. New work, not previously announced. 2 - The Singapore production facility is open and manufacturing. 3 - South Korea, with the help of Dutch industry, is acquiring an identical prototype; language that sits alongside EOS's conditional US$80M Goldrone contract in Korea. Now here's where I'm joining dots rather than stating fact. A separate article this week shows the Netherlands upgrading its Boxer armoured vehicles with RWS counter drone capability. cuashub.com/en/content/net… Neither document names EOS as the specific Boxer contractor. However - EOS's own website shows their RWS was live-fire tested on Dutch Boxer APCs back in 2021 by the 13th Lichte Brigade. eos-aus.com/news/dutch-box… The Dutch government document then confirms EOS was commissioned in 2025 and 2026 to build C-UAS integration for Dutch RWS platforms. And the Boxer upgrade article describes exactly that; RWS counter-drone integration on Boxers. Three separate sources, pointing in the same direction. Could be coincidence but worth watching. What isn't dot joining is a government primary source document explicitly naming EOS, confirming expanded contract scope, an open production facility, and a Korean technology transfer pathway. Shout out to @TheObserverCap for bringing this to my attention, well worth a follow!





















🚀 $FLY is building the most complete space business, most people haven't noticed the SciTec upside yet... Alpha + Eclipse — Launch - Alpha (small lift) already flying 24hr responsive-launch missions for the USSF. Alpha is also used for hypersonics. Worth flagging that Alpha does not have the same launch track record as Electron. - Eclipse (medium lift co-developed w/ Northrop Grumman) puts 16,300kg to LEO — Miranda engine has completed full-duration hot fires - First flight targeting as early as 2027 Firefly Aerospace. Neutron won't launch before late-2026 at the earliest but likely to be late, so $FLY will beat them to market. Sorry $RKLB Blue Ghost (Lunar) - Only commercial company to successfuly land on the Moon. Full stop. Sorry $LUNR, falling over twice doesn't count... - Mission 2 already in the pipeline Elytra (In-Space) - Transfer vehicle for cislunar ops - National security contract already secured - Pairs with Blue Ghost as a full end-to-end lunar logistics play - Already being used for a lunar constellation that FireFly is deploying. SciTec (Defense Software) - AI-enabled defence analytics for missile tracking, acquired 2025 - Air battle management + in-space data processing Turns FLY into a software story too Revenue up 163% YoY in 2025. Firefly Aerospace Guiding $420–450m for 2026. Still ~50% below IPO price. Make of that what you will 👀 #Space $FLY $RKLB $LUNR I have a position and will be diving deeper into each of the segments on coming days, how the parts pair together isn't properly understood.

Decentralized power supply for AI data centers is currently one of the hottest themes in the market, and the relevant stocks have been moving rapidly higher. In fuel cells, $BE is the clear market leader, while $FCEL and Ceres Power are trying to position themselves as alternatives. On the combustion side, the situation is different: the major gas turbine manufacturers such as GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi Power are effectively sold out, with multi year backlogs extending well into the second half of the 2020s. The obvious alternative is gas engines, where several established players are active, including $CAT, Wärtsilä, INNIO and its Jenbacher platform, Cummins, and 2G Energy. One advantage of gas engine solutions over fuel cells receives far too little attention in the current debate: they are dispatchable and therefore combine naturally with solar power. The engine ramps up when solar generation falls away. Fuel cells cannot do this. They are fundamentally baseload assets and do not tolerate rapid load changes or frequent start stop cycles. This matters more for AI workloads than many investors realize. Pure baseload power is primarily needed during full scale training runs, and even there, workloads create second by second load transients. Inference is even more dynamic because it follows user demand and therefore exhibits a clear daily utilization profile. This is exactly where dispatchable gas engines excel, especially when paired with a modest battery energy storage system. Some of these engines can already operate on hydrogen, further strengthening their long term relevance. The downside relative to fuel cells is clear: lower efficiency and higher emissions because fuel is combusted. There is one particularly interesting German company in this space that already has a strong position in decentralized energy infrastructure for the energy transition through combined heat and power systems, biogas solutions, and large scale heat pumps: 2G Energy $2GB.DE According to management, the company is currently close to signing several US data center contracts in the high double digit to low triple digit megawatt range, with each individual order potentially worth up to €100 million. That is highly meaningful for a company currently guiding for €440-490 million in annual revenue. For larger competitors, deals of this size would barely move the needle. The stock is already up roughly 50% ytd. That is not insignificant, and on absolute numbers it is not cheap. But relative to peers it still looks highly attractive: P/S 2026e of approximately 2.1x EV/EBIT 2026e of roughly 22x EV/EBIT 2027e of roughly 18x Compare that to $BE at roughly 11 to 13x forward sales, or GE Vernova with a market cap near $293 billion and a forward earnings multiple around 32x. Based on its current business alone, 2G is not cheap. But the data center optionality is still not reflected in the valuation. The concrete advantages of 2G’s solutions include: Standardized modular units manufactured in house and deliverable within roughly 9 to 18 months. This is the critical advantage while turbine supply remains constrained. The Gas2Power platform covers backup power, prime power, and grid services, with full load step capability within 10 seconds. This makes it ideal for pairing with solar generation. The waste heat can be used for absorption cooling, directly supporting data center thermal management. Approximately 55 dB(A) at 10 meters, which materially improves permitting prospects for sensitive sites. What makes the business model especially compelling is its focus on high margin recurring service revenue. A triple digit megawatt installed base generates maintenance and service revenue over more than a decade. That recurring stream is the real compounding engine behind what initially appears to be a one time equipment sale. For investors looking at decentralized AI infrastructure power, this company is worth a look.





