TheTinMen

Witnessed / Experienced abuse prisonreformtrust.org.uk/wp-content/upl… Mental Health Disorders prisonreformtrust.org.uk/wp-content/upl… publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cm… Traumatic brain injuries committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc… theguardian.com/society/2019/f… Reoffending rates committees.parliament.uk/publications/2… Parents of dependent children gov.uk/government/sta… Drug, alcohol, homelessness and suicide …websitebuilder.service.justice.gov.uk/uploads/sites/…

And that's without looking at the absolute numbers of men in need, which are astronomical, and dwarf women entirely. So tens of thousands of men, are ignored and sidelined, due to the cowardice and self interests of politicians. So who will help these men? What do you think?

The UK Gov have announced £31.6 million in funding for women in prison, for drug addiction, employment, and housing issues... For prison reformists such as myself, this is welcome news. But what will disappoint (but not surprise) you, is there is no similar funding for men...

@DanniBrener @asanebel2 Are you serious? It is incredibly easy to ‘prove’ abuse in family court, as they have notoriously low requirements of evidence, aka a ‘preponderance of evidence’ rather than ‘beyond reasonable doubt’.

@asanebel2 It is extremely difficult to prove abuse to a court. Especially historically when women had fewer rights. The ability to leave a marriage without needing proof of abuse or approval of your husband allowed women an exit they did not previously have.

Men who are against no-fault divorce, please just admit that you want women to be trapped in abusive marriages with no way out.

If you’re talking about “the class divide”, but refusing to talk specifically about men and boys (especially in education and health), then you are not actually talking about the class divide. I really hope the emerging progressive left (ahem, Green Party) learn this lesson.

@wrenske @helenlewis This is honestly one of the dumbest rebukes to these stats. Seriously low IQ stuff.

@TheTinMenBlog @helenlewis Yeah, I would say that too if I believed stories that claim that men are women, and if I believed the faulty statistics based on those lies.

It is very strange to publish an article on the gender dynamics of mass shooters and not mention that the two "female" shooters used as flagship examples here were biologically male. Males commit more than 90% of violent crimes.

@AizenReich @utopiantheory lol!

@TheTinMenBlog @utopiantheory You’re the fucking definition of this meme mate

The hidden misogyny of modern feminism: Violence by women is just another part of 'women’s autonomy'; and if you don’t acknowledge such acts by women, then that's exactly what you are denying. Yes. Women's autonomy – as we are reminded – is the choice to be breadwinners, CEOs and world leaders; but so too it is the choice to be violent, to be abusers, and to be bullies. That's what autonomy is. The ability to do as one chooses, rather than only what is most expedient to one's political agenda. Simply put, women are human beings. Human beings, who are, to quote Margaret Atwood, 'capable of the full range of saintly and demonic behaviours, including criminal ones...' And the science finds this too. We all know that as a society becomes more gender equal, violence against women decreases. But as far fewer know, or care to admit, as societies become more gender equal, partner violence by women increases, to become roughly equal to that of men. And so, the real misogyny in the room is revealed. One that benevolently infantilises women as incapable, or as perpetual victims, unable to make their own decisions as autonomous, powerful adults. The voice that celebrates women who climb to the top of the corporate ladder, but sneers and cries 'internalised misogyny' when another chooses to be a stay-at-home mum instead. A voice that desperately grasps for excuses in an attempt to explain away, or pin violence by women onto men, as somehow being "forced", or even as "preemptive attacks" against the so-called patriarchy. Such a dim view is emblematic of certain strands of regressive feminism; that frames women as puppets, controlled at the behest of men, or as children, to be handled with soft-kiddy-gloves at all times. It's a voice that fundamentally diminishes women, and is the absolute antithesis of autonomy and empowerment. This is not ‘respecting women’, at all. Let me be clear – I believe the vast majority of women (like men) are wonderful. But autonomy, by its very definition, is the choice to do good, or bad, and anything less than that fails to see women in the full colour of their brilliance, and brutality. What do you think?

@sirgarwain ‘More than’ 10%

@TheTinMenBlog Hmm I wonder why she found it important to add an extra 10%? The number seems so specific despite being well outside the actual range.

It’s actually 79%. FBI / US crime data consistently finds around 79-80% of violent crime arrests are male. This disparity grows for more extreme violence. For murder it’s about 88-90% male. For school shooters, it’s around 98% male. But violent crime in general is 79%.

@utopiantheory Incoherent, according to some random dude who just invents words? Lol. Okay pal.

@TheTinMenBlog Your view is incoherent, feminists are not motivated by a hatred of women. By not accounting for the difference between a rational and irrational love of women, you completely lose what is at stake by misconstruing the root cause of how feminists also hurt women by hurting men.

@utopiantheory It is misogyny, as it treats women as children and diminishes their autonomy. "Paraphilogyny" isn't even a word.

@TheTinMenBlog Stop calling it misogyny, they don’t hate women, that’s not what motivates them. It’s an irrational kind of love. Call it ”paraphilogyny” or simply irrational or neurotic philogyny.

So what do you think of the new NISVS 23/24 stats? How can you explain this rather dramatic shift? And how do we support all victims, no matter the gender, and no matter how few? What do you think? ~ NISVS 23/24 cdc.gov/nisvs/media/pd…

The CDC have noted they have changed the survey questions, emphasising coercive control, and psychological aggression, as well as changing to an online, rather than phone-based survey as previously used. Furthermore – We all know that since the last survey (in 2015/16) a huge societal shift has happened, with #MeToo making violence against women a national conversation in 2017, which certainly will have encouraged more women to disclose their abuse too. Whatever the reason, what is most important, is that even though this new data shows men as ‘just’ 30% of IPV victims overall, this still represents millions of American men, who should not be waved away as insignificant...

Every few years, the CDC releases their National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS); which is arguably America’s largest, and highest quality survey on intimate partner violence. In the previous release, from 2015/16, and in every NISVS published prior (2010, 2010-12, and 2015), the data revealed near gender parity in victimisation of intimate partner violence; a shocking, and deeply unpopular finding, that you will have seen on TheTinMen. But in the new survey, released just a few weeks ago, things have changed; with the cumulative victims of those who experienced sexual violence, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner, shifting from near 50:50, to become 70:30, in favour of women...

@antmiddleton The fact you used the words ‘rule over’, really reveals how you see yourself, and us Londoners as subjects. It’s a hard pass for me.

I will dethrone this man! A Christian Englishman must rule over the Capital of England. I know it sounds obvious however to prevent the cultural takeover that is happening across the nation. It is absolutely imperative that this happens! 🫡🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@PhilMitchell83 @grok @ShipleyWrites Exactly. Safeguarding children should be done on an individual basis, rather than through performative virtue signalling and sexism.

@grok @TheTinMenBlog @ShipleyWrites Does this justify banning woman from being alone with young children? No. Of course it doesn’t

Every time I say “men shouldn’t work with babies and toddlers”, creeps like this appear. They care more about some perceived criticism of men than they do about the safety of infants. All decent men recognise that we shouldn’t allow any men to work in nurseries because of the average risk they pose (not least because paedophiles seek out jobs which give them access to victims).

@grok @ShipleyWrites @PhilMitchell83 There you go @ShipleyWrites, here’s your data. Now time to apologise for publicly calling @beano_bananaman a creep.

Females are the #1 perpetrators of child maltreatment overall (52% female vs 47% male in 2023 US data; 54-56% in prior NCANDS), mostly mothers as primary caregivers. Neonaticide (<24h or <28d): nearly 100% mothers (global median). Infanticide (<1yr): mothers majority in global reviews (~72% of parental cases under 1yr), though recent US NVDRS data shows males predominate for post-neonatal. Data from OJJDP, BMJ Paediatrics Open, PMC studies.