Wickedd

@OVO_Kareem @TheBoysOOCC Holy shit, its called finishing storyline and tying up loose ends. You know, the final act? Not just all flashy action like every other season? Its the most basic of story writing. 🤦‍♂️

@TheBoysOOCC Find another take from Reddit to plagiarize bro. No one gave a shit about Terror, Starlighter’s family or Black Noir (old AND new) for the past 7 years. Kinda seems like a waste of time to force that out of the audience now, in the final act of the story.

Youtuber Moist Cr1TiKaL weighs in on #TheBoys Season 5 recent episodes. "There is nothing that has been filler about the episodes, there just giving you more information on the characters. And every single episode progresses the overall plot....It is actual just brain rot attention spans right now that can't stand actually watching something longer than 60 seconds or anything somewhat slow to build up to something" (Via: penguinz0 on Youtube)

@JackK490113 @Iithosphere Did you just mimic "UwU" speech and immediately follow it up by trying to take a swing towards gays? Weird strategy man, weird strategy.

@Iithosphere Believing in nothing isn't cool anymore. I hate to be the one to tell you all this. And anyone who believes in anything, transcribes that belief onto a symbol (usually a flag). From "EVIW NATIONAWISTS!" to your precious fucking gays.

new banksy artwork, a man blinded by his flag

@Type_Other Sure, if thats your interpretation of it, by all means. Ultimately the point is that every person on Earth votes, by any interpretation you see fit, as long as it concludes in every person voting. Considering the hypothetical is about death or not, I feel this isn't on choice.

@TheWickeddOne It can be hit by any size but not any level of impairment? Quadriplegics are just screwed? These aren't "unnecessary details" because robbing some of the choice by forcing randomness would influence both how many (and who) press each button, and their degree of responsibility.

This is a crucial point. Red button pushers grasp that society functions because people are self-reliant, engaging in trillions of individual acts that make for a better world. Blue button pushers justify to themselves that they’re cooperative and altruistic, but they’re actually ignorant and lazy, and a drain on society, a cancer at worst.

@Type_Other Because its not accommodated for a "midget", its universally made to be hit by any size, where as brail would be a specific accommodation. And I would assume that if you were to dig this deep into unnecessary details, that you would come to this most sound of conclusions.

@TheWickeddOne Why would I assume it must be low enough for midgets to press, but braille/audio isn't provided for the blind, so their participation is just spoiled? Everybody seems to be making unique assumptions about the mechanics here that aren't ever covertly snuck into moral dilemmas.

@Type_Other "By pressing a button", you can imagine the buttons being two large buttons of the floor, capable by any to hit, even mistakenly. There are universal solutions to circumvent specific accommodations, aside from those incapable of voting, who would ultimately amount to null & void.

@TheWickeddOne "Everyone in the world has to vote..." That's a contradiction which either must exclude or accomodate those who can't. E.g. the buttons can't be 6ft up, or short enough adults can't participate. Such mechanical issues aren't pertinent to dilemmas because they go without saying.

@Type_Other No, in this hypothetical it very clearly states that the vote is hitting either a Red or Blue button. This isn't about the philosophy around the definition of the word "Vote". Its literally "pressing a red or blue button", as stated in the hypothetical.

@TheWickeddOne Toddlers and the blind aren't capable of voting either; they can't express an opinion on the scenario. Voting is not hitting a button--it is willful selection. That's why many took it as everyone capable of understanding participates, e.g the blind or paralized are accomodated.

@Type_Other In this hypothetical, sure, but thats outside of a blue voters control and ability to stop, and irrelevant to their vote. Toddlers, children, the blind and mentally handicapped still are a part of the vote who have a high likelihood of hitting blue, which a blue vote does save.

@TheWickeddOne 100% of the incapable are guaranteed death, since they can't vote. There's no way to save them. That's detrimental to the upside of blue.

@Type_Other Statistically*

@Type_Other Some would be, sure. You could argue potentially even most, but statically it would not be all of them, and many would inevitably unintentionally or mistakingly hit blue. Which is the major hinge point that the blue vote is based on, the acknowledgement that it won't be 100% Red.

@Type_Other It doesn't say or imply you're trapped in a booth until everyone votes, just that everyone on Earth has to make a vote. I interpret that as you're in the booth until you vote, than back to where you left off while you wait for the conclusion to the vote.

@TheWickeddOne The part where those mentally/physically incapable of voting now hold up the rest of us for as long as it takes them to starve to death.

@Type_Other There is no "magical booth limbo", and everyone voting is very easily resolved, its a very simple tick box. Are you a person on Earth: Yes? You vote. Did you die before you vote? You're no longer a person on Earth, therefore not part of the poll. Where are you getting lost?

@TheWickeddOne Then the presence of even a single person mentally/physically incapable of voting traps humanity in magical booth limbo, because we can't resolve "everyone votes." This evidences that he simply forgot to consider them, because now they eventually starve to death regardless.

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika It very clearly says "Every person on Earth", therefore if you are a person on Earth you will vote. Privately, as stated, not a choice made for you. I interpret this as if you cannot or do not vote, I imagine you sit in the voting room until you are no longer a person on Earth.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika Nowhere in the question does it say unconscious or paralyzed people will have a random choice made on their behalf--it says they'll vote, which by definition is an expression of an opinion.

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika I'm honestly lost as to where you're confused. The scenario has always been that some votes will be the equivalent of a coin flip to the variables of "Every person on Earth", which is why Blue understood that we would never have 100% Red, and people would die without 51% blue.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika Did you just not think of it either? How they vote isn't trivial, because effectively flipping a coin for incapable people and calling it their "vote" is a very different scenario than if they freely made the choice as an expression of their will--the very definition of voting.

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika How they vote is the question in its entirety, and the point of what complicates the hypothetical, that you seem to be missing. No one knows. All the information you have is that they WILL vote, and it WILL be done in private. The rest is for you to interpret.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika Neither beast's nor the guy he took the question from mentions how voting occurs for those physically/mentally incapable of voting. That's why there's a contradiction leaving us to guess how things like the comatose are handled. Do they just rot in the room with no vote forever?

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika Yes, it quite literally did include that. Im not making any assumptions, I'm following the question literally. You seem to be making the assumptions as to who and who isn't included. It truly is as simple as thr question states. You can interpret the difficulties as you may.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika The question didn't include that. It was asked in a reply. You're assuming the blind person votes randomly, but the person in a vegetative state might get a vote cast based on how they would if they had cognition? Or do they get the unstated coinflip too?

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika The question clarifies that the vote is done in "Private", and he clarified that includes even a toddler being randomly teleported to randomly mash a button. So yes, the blind would vote, privately It seems thought out, and is very specific and straightforward with its wording.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika Are blind people also robbed of the choice because they can't tell one button from another, or are accomodations made to allow them to participate? He obviously just didn't think about it, so we got the contradiction of flipping coins for people and calling it their "vote."

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika The rules were clear from the beginning with "Every person on Earth". You can interpret how a comatose individual would vote however you want, but the rules of the game were "Every person on Earth" Its just a hypothetical though, you don't have to like the pollsters rules.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika I'm aware of his followup, but that's because he simply didn't consider the contradiction created by people who can't vote. Are the comatose electrically shocked until they flail into a button? It's a weird assumption that some have different rules, and their vote may be stolen.

@kdrama247 @MarkChangizi @Waltika @waitbutwhy We all read the same question, and Blues understood perfectly fine with the majority of them also not receiving the clarification before they voted. Blue has also been saying for days that babies and toddlers were part of the vote, only for Red to tell them their wrong 🤦‍♂️

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika @waitbutwhy This addition is in comments not the original post. So most people didn't see it 33.9K and I never saw this post at all. I saw Mr. Beast's post. It's a few days later but 38M dude. I think most people saw his without the addition about the kids pushing buttons randomly.

@MrBeast Am I the only one who sees that the Tweet clearly says "If this tweet"? Not "The Tweet that" or "If your tweet" or anything implying "Whichever tweet". It says "This Tweet". This game has been over since the second like occurred. None of you have reading comprehension.

If this tweet has exactly 1 like in 24 hours I’ll give that person $1,000,000

@Type_Other @MarkChangizi @Waltika It includes all of them, including infants and toddlers, as stated by the original pollster who created the hypothetical to begin with.

@TheWickeddOne @MarkChangizi @Waltika "Everyone has to vote" must leave out those incapable of voting--unless we assume it necessarily grants sight to the blind, movement to the paralyzed, cognition to the vegetative, etc. to participate. But if it's doing that, why not assume it's making infants moral agents too?