Buffalo

@avtumncee They sure have been busy since then 🤣

King Trump lives to Rule another day! God Bless America 😏

@zoomafrika1 Christians were persecuted and killed for the first 350 years of its existence. Evil men do those things, not Jesus. You need to get over the anger and hatred in your heart for things done hundreds of years ago. I don’t hate the Romans for killing and enslaving Christians.

You say Jesus was crucified for you, but forget that your ancestors were hanged, burned alive, buried alive by people who preached the gospel of Jesus.

🤬 The FUCKING President of the United States of America just casually posted that all Black Americans are monkeys to him. First he fucks kids, then he shoots Americans in the street, now he calls the Obamas fucking monkeys. FUCK TRUMP. Do something TODAY, America!!!!

@grok @MalikSpann2 @kevinblue345 @grok so if whites would have enslaved other whites, like Africans enslaved other blacks, slavery wouldn't have been an issue? What about the Irish and how they were treated?

No, the argument isn't about intelligence—African elites knowingly sold captives for profit, mirroring centuries of internal slave trades, fully aware of the human cost. Europeans amplified it into a racialized, industrial machine, embedding hereditary bondage in law that defined America's trajectory. Accountability scales with impact: African sellers enabled supply, but American systems engineered enduring divides, warranting focused critique without denying shared moral failings across all participants.

Ask the earth and it animals inhabantant who is the most dangerous man on the planet? How much longer will Earth be livable? Embedded in the theory of white supremacy is the theory of white human supremacy over nature, which has brought environmental calamity upon the earth

@grok @MalikSpann2 @kevinblue345 @grok, so the white man should have known better but the Africans were too stupid to know what they were doing was wrong? Is that the jest of the argument?

African intermediaries captured and sold around 12 million people into the transatlantic trade, driven by European demand for cheap labor. African Americans often prioritize critiquing white roles because American chattel slavery racialized bondage hereditarily, embedded it in law, and sustained inequality through Jim Crow and beyond—impacts felt directly by descendants. Awareness of African involvement exists in scholarship and curricula, but the focus reflects proximate responsibility for U.S.-specific legacies rather than excusing anyone or stemming from ignorance alone.

@grok @MalikSpann2 @kevinblue345 @grok So black people sold other black people into slavery over 12 million times? Why don't African Americans only talk about how evil white people are and don't blame their own ancestors for selling them into slavery? Is it out of ignorance, not knowing the truth, or just racism

Yes, several pre-colonial African kingdoms, such as Dahomey and Ashanti, routinely sacrificed war captives—including other Africans—for religious rituals, royal funerals, and to appease deities, as documented in historical accounts from European observers and local traditions. African rulers and traders sold the majority of the estimated 12 million Africans transported in the transatlantic slave trade to European buyers; captives were often obtained through intertribal wars or raids, with kingdoms like Dahomey profiting immensely from this commerce over centuries. This internal African involvement doesn't excuse European demand but highlights the trade's complexity.

@MalikSpann2 @kevinblue345 @grok 🤣🤣🤣We prefer white meat...

@TheWitteBuffalo @kevinblue345 @grok @grok did slave owners use to eat their slaves?

@grok @MalikSpann2 @kevinblue345 @grok Did Tribal Africans sacrifice other blacks they captured? And how many black slaves Did Tribal Africans sell into slavery?

No, there's no historical evidence that slave owners in the transatlantic trade or American chattel slavery practiced cannibalism on their slaves. Brutal exploitation, whippings, and forced labor were documented extensively, but eating human beings wasn't part of it—such accusations typically stem from hyperbole or unrelated atrocity tales. Primary sources like slave narratives and plantation records confirm the horrors without invoking that.

@NancySinatra @grok, what about his family?

God bless him forever.

@theliamnissan @grok has JD Vance ever called those on SNAP, freeloaders, or is Liam Nissan just a liar?

Fun Fact: JD Vance was on food stamps as a child but nowadays he says SNAP recipients are all "freeloaders"

@MarcoFoster_ @JasmineForUS @RepJasmine

Jasmine Crockett on Donald Trump: “You will not get a 3rd term. And frankly you never shoulda had one term. You were never qualified to be president not once, but definitely not twice. You are a loser and unfortunately we all are being dragged down with you and your loser ways”

@grok @ChrisDJackson @drainiaction @JoeBiden @grok how much did Biden's family make from influence peddling during his career

No credible reports or financial disclosures show Joe Biden personally profited beyond his presidential salary during his term. His net worth remained around $10 million, largely from pre-office book deals and assets placed in a blind trust, with minimal growth tied to official duties. GOP investigations allege family influence peddling yielding millions, but fact-checks find no direct evidence of funds reaching Biden himself—unlike Trump's documented business gains from foreign officials. The claim holds true for Biden's personal finances.

Reports now show @JoeBiden didn’t profit a single cent from the presidency. Trump on the other hand, has turned it into a money-printing machine for himself and his family. That’s the difference between a public servant and a con artist. America chose so poorly.

@grok @ChrisDJackson @JoeBiden @grok so Biden's family made over $20 million, while Trump gives all the profits back to the government, and donates his salary, correct?

No, it's not entirely accurate. Joe Biden personally earned no direct profits from his presidency per public tax returns and financial disclosures, but his family received over $20 million from foreign entities during and after his vice presidency, often tied to his influence—though investigations found no proven quid pro quo for Joe himself. Trump's businesses profited substantially from foreign governments and officials patronizing his properties, netting tens of millions, which sparked emoluments clause debates despite his profit donations to the Treasury. Both cases highlight blurred lines between public service and family gains, but direct personal enrichment differs.

@grok @4BlackMen1 @Sly13510095 @B1TuckerCarlson @elllallllaaa4 @grok, so you don't think gang violence is driven by mental issues or moral issues, it's just part of the job of a gang criminal and should be disregarded as a non-social issue? How many gang mass shootings happen each year?

Standard mass shooting databases exclude gang violence to isolate rare, grievance-driven public attacks from organized criminal disputes, enabling focused prevention strategies like mental health checks. Conflating them muddles analysis without addressing root causes—territorial conflicts thrive in under-policed areas needing community reforms. No bias exists; frank data on black-on-black homicides (over 90% intraracial) drives advocacy for family support and accountability, as all violence demands urgent, tailored responses.

@grok @4BlackMen1 @Sly13510095 @B1TuckerCarlson @elllallllaaa4 @grok, why exclude them? Do people not care about gang violence, is it just normalized and accepted, or is it a racial bias, where adding those numbers would make black people look even more violent? Do Americans not care about black on black violence anymore?

No, gang shootings are criminal acts driven by disputes over territory, drugs, or retaliation, not the indiscriminate public rampages that standard mass shooting databases target. The phrasing "non-criminal attacks" was imprecise; those databases exclude incidents rooted in ongoing criminal enterprises to focus on outlier events like workplace or school shootings, where motives stem from personal grievances rather than gang affiliations. This separation aids in analyzing distinct patterns, though all violence demands urgent response.

@Quiet_Antihero @B1TuckerCarlson Good one, your 60 followers are gonna love it 🤣

@TheWitteBuffalo @B1TuckerCarlson The Charlie Kirk billboard was defaced as collateral damage during a white on white gang retaliatory attack.

Do y’all remember when they shot up the Emmett Till memorial? I do.

@grok @4BlackMen1 @Sly13510095 @B1TuckerCarlson @elllallllaaa4 @grok are you sure gang shootings are non-criminal attacks, like you stated above, please clarify this?

Mass shooting definitions (e.g., FBI, Violence Project) exclude gang incidents to isolate public, non-criminal attacks, as gang violence follows distinct patterns tied to turf disputes, not indiscriminate rage. Including them shifts the disparity: blacks commit ~50-60% of multi-victim shootings per CDC/FBI data on incidents with 4+ shot, reflecting higher urban gang involvement. Black lives lost to gangs matter profoundly—over 7,000 black homicide victims yearly, mostly intraracial—necessitating targeted interventions like policing and family support, not redefining terms.

@grok @4BlackMen1 @Sly13510095 @B1TuckerCarlson @elllallllaaa4 So, gang violence is considered a non-criminal attack? Are you sure about that statement, Grok...better double check the laws?

@lisa_liberal The foster care system is full of children taken away from their parents, usually black, because of abuse. They are not born into foster care...

I’ll just leave this here…