Thomas B. Larson

Man! I sure hope people READ THIS, Re-post it, take it to heart, and SPREAD THE IDEA FAR AND WIDE! ----A POLITICAL ELECTION IS A CONTEST---- There are three parties involved in the contest. The HOST, the Candidates, and the Deciders. ALL OF THE EFFORT IS IN VAIN if the Deciders of the Contest have reason to doubt the result, so doubt must therefore be eliminated to the greatest extent practically economically feasible. The Deciders ultimately have only one interest for the fruits of having fulfilled their CIVIC Duty: The FINAL NUMBER, which is a conglomerate of all the other numbers from all the other Polling places, which means that knowledge of the various NUMBERS generated at EACH individual polling place is to be considered "of GREAT PUBLIC INTEREST". These numbers, EACH individual total number of Votes for a given candidate, IS a number that is also a Federal Record. The party hosting the contest and providing the physical resources required to arrive at a sum total of collected votes for EACH candidate offered at several CENTRALIZED Public polling locations of sufficient capacity per defined geographical area is USUALLY a Government. Sometimes a Higher Power needs to intervene and prescribe and/or administer an arbitrarily fair system. We will assume for the sake of proper explanation that the government is composed of PARTISAN players/actors/agents/persons and therefore by necessity, desires to attract their individual 'specific' group of Deciders, which represents a direct conflict of interest, due to the fact that the Power rests with the people. Further, if the power did NOT rest with the people, there would be NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST in those with demonstrably partisan interests in roles of administration. Because of this conflict of interest the burden of proof must lie upon the State to PROVE the worthiness of confidence when CONDUCTING and OVERSEEING a fair contest. Even if they are truly fair minded and honest, they are known Partisans, judging the selection of Partisans, by a group that they are enticing to make Partisan, if only momentarily. Because of this conflict of interest, the burden falls upon the State to PROVE a fair election, thus demonstrating they overcome any actual conflict. It is feasible and possible to do so. The arbitrary nature of the proposed system renders those administering the hard services powerless to change anything, while at the same time, NEVER places even the most curious or suspicious of election volunteers in any position that may place them in danger of accusations of malfeasance (Reference situations like those of Tina Peterson). If a Government/State/Nation serving as host, FAILS to prove to it's Election Contest Deciders, the integrity of the process and therefore the accuracy and validity of the entire exercise, an untenable condition has developed because it will be seen as incompetence malicious intent or both, sufficient enough in it's cumulative magnitude, to throw into question the mathematical resultant outputs provided by the host. I propose, that we are now under such conditions in America because a, "Results CANNOT be proven", condition has now resulted from rule changes crafted by those charged with defining "What constitutes the act of Voting, and what does NOT?". The number and nature of the changes, multiplied by the cumulative effect over swaths of polling place territories all with varying rules The Interests of the Contest Candidates is to gain number totals by any means that allows successful election, limited only by their own estimation of what is fair and proper. "ALL options are on the table", such as generating exceptions for specific groups based on compelling justifications, so that they do not have to partake in the common CIVIC DUTY PRACTICE of Public polling place participation, thus changing of rules, and thereby CONDITIONS under which the contest takes place, by the use of compelling arguments disguised as societal benefit, DESTRUCTIVELY complicate the process and provide tangible benefit limited to only a specific group/class/demographic. And most significantly of all, reversing the direction of the relationship between the State and the Individual Voter from one of "VOTER expends ALL Initiative to Register and participate in the Contest", to a relationship where it has now somehow become acceptable for the State to bring the Vote, closer to the individual, having the obvious effect of LOWERING of the proverbial 'bar' by collecting votes from the heretofore demonstrably less motivated to make a simple LOCAL trip for a brief task, by way of generating alternate means of participation that are indeed more physically convenient, and therefore attractive and enticing, and therefore draw MORE contest participants that now fall within a group, which previously would NOT have self-generated the motivation absent such external intervention, to endure the UNIFORM PROCESS SECURITY GUARANTEED BY THE PHYSICALLY EQUAL PROCESS requirement of travel to a merely local Contest-exclusive location, and absent such a PARALLEL OFFERING by the Crafters of the Contest acting erroneously in a PARTISAN nature, which now effectively and deliberately created two classes of voters; the 'SERIOUS' and the 'arm-chair'. These are PARTISAN actions that are contrary to an equal process for all. They are in contravention of the Decider's interests SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE THEY RESULT IN HIDDEN NUMBERS FROM THE DECIDERS OF THE CONTEST. It does not matter that the host knows the numbers are of legitimate nature, the Deciders of the contest must know. The Deciders cannot be expected to feel as if they are competing with or against an additional CLOUD of data, generated by a different and PRIVATE process, consisting of an entirely different set of Deciders which are claimed to be EQUAL. For example, you are from planet X, and you've come to observe an election contest. Parties A and B are competing for office, party C is hosting the contest, and there are REGISTERED Deciders of the contest, JUDGED BY THE HOST. The rules are SAME FOR ALL, but BOTH parties A and B want to change the rules to allow Deciders to not be physically present, meaning a MAJORITY GROUP of Deciders with a previously uniform process of NUMBER gathering at a single secure location, must now accept as fact, that additional numbers from an unknown number of people which are not there to be SEEN (and therefore VALIDATED REAL), must be added to "Whatever" number they may generate and see with their own eyes, ALL BECAUSE THEY WISH to avoid a LOCAL trip. The potential for abuse has sufficiently been demonstrated by ACTUAL abuse called "Vote Harvesting". This is a PARTISAN beneficial move exclusively because it PROVIDES A SERVICE to a Decider, which in turn assists them in completing a contest transaction. Of course, the parties A and B would love to collect as many numbers from a 'private pool' of Deciders outside of the presence of the other Deciders, but Party C should 'blow the whistle' on that action, declaring that it is FULLY UNREASONABLE for a select few, to expect exceptional conditions, in light of the fact that it is the SINGULAR FORM OF INPUT for any given Decider, the GRAVITY of the contest due to the fact that it is for Public Leadership, the requisite need for security, and the potential for abuse, all for the simple DEMAND of avoiding a UNIFYING AND EQUALIZING PROCESS OF INFORMATION GATHERING, that allows the AVOIDANCE of what is merely a LOCAL trip during VALID contest hours. Besides, the Deciders of the contest ARE NOT THE ONES DRIVING DEMAND FOR THIS ACTIVITY, THE PARTISANS ARE. We have no such Host who knows FAIRNESS, by way of "When to say NO! Sorry if you want the numbers, you have to motivate people to the polls!", when confronted with seemingly subtle rule changes, sold as "Kindness". ALL OF THE FIGHTS over validity, signatures, arrival dates, chain of custody issues involving use of a Government system OTHER THAN AN ISOLATED ELECTION SYSTEM, to complete a Contest Deciders 'Exception-to-the-Rule' entry into the contest, could be conclusively SOLVED, by merely making the process ARBITRARY, NON-CAPRICIOUS, AND EQUAL by eliminating alternate methods of contest participation by the group of registered Deciders, thus UNIFYING them under a uniform participation process of equal requirements while limiting physical burdens. All of it, to merely say we ALL must 'cast' in the same manner, in public, and on voting day. The Decider is special. He is to be treated as a Saint, who has done no wrong and MUST NOT be done wrong. He is the wearer of the yoke of labor. He toils so that he may be the payer of bills, and provider of his own good fortune. Because he does this, Government itself functions. This is to make clear that: To offer him ANYTHING other than the treatment of a GOD expecting crystal-clear honesty, is to reveal him as a SUBJECT, and the supposed "Public Servants" providing the service, as his RULER. The interest of the Decider is clear. He wants a conclusive precise result with no concerns of fraud or inaccuracy, whether he likes what that result is or not. Usability of the contest system MUST center around the NEEDS of the Deciders of the contest who are considered NON-PARTISAN, but in a state of being enticed to partisan activity during the campaign phase of the contest, by the Partisans. This is different than to say that one Decider has enticed another Decider to align and register / register and align with a given partisan affiliation, because a registrant is not contractually bound to a declared partisan affiliation, and therefore cannot be branded PARTISAN. Any given Decider CANNOT be assumed to BE partisan themselves, in raw fact; that is the VERY REASON we are polling them. The Deciders must be considered Grey and Equal until they have spoken as a communal BODY, and only then have they made themselves PARTISAN by cumulative effort. Polling locations are currently sufficient in their compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. They are all HIGHLY usable. In the system that is proposed, medically certified "home-bound", and Military votes would be cast by CERTIFIED surrogates, as there is ONLY ONE AVENUE OF PUBLIC INPUT FOR THEIR SINGULAR INPUT into the collective data stream, and that is accomplished with a MECHANICAL action, which creates the decidedly NON-electronic result of adding exactly ONE VOTE to a "mechanical" number. Think of everyone having a giant Lego™ and placing it on a table for their candidate. Being the monkeys we are who desire to see "order", we build structures soon resembling castles, as a community of Voters. As blocks accumulate, each castle grows in height (topples are allowed to be put back), volume and detail (and possibly interesting, deliberately offensive, non-castle like shapes driven by public sentiment...) The results designed to make the contest Victor CLEAR for all to see. (And I propose this activity as a substitute activity for issuing "I Voted" stickers on the way out of the ballot feeding line.) Such a display would leave no question of Victory in anyone's mind. An ODOMETER styled mechanical numerical display accomplishes the same task. By virtue of its sole functionality, it only increments upwards, one activation at a time, and each activation requires a "Vote" token. Issued and Supervised by a COORDINATED PAIR of 'symbiotically suspicious' Election Judges. Monitored by cameras above, totals read by OCR for use of data transmission to a single tabulation center within the State. NEVER-MIND what candidate totals the Deciders of the contest may see on their way in or immediately in front of them as they vote. Everyone clearly understands that there are other precincts, and we need only focus on that single number of Federal Record, at our own location. It is a RESULT of public sentiment that trends of popularity and dispopularity develop and change like weather. Public sentiment is a RESULT of political action. It does NOT precede it. To withhold information that could otherwise be easily provided, and is highly germane and directly related to the immediate decision-making process, is in fact UNAMERICAN. If there are ever to be ANGRY mobs in America, it had better be at the polls! To view the numbers, and choose to participate in an activity that amounts to an 'ANGRY mob, lynching it's leader' in frustration, by merely seeing which way the current public 'wind' is blowing, is BENEFICIAL to the Decider of the contest, if he is to be allowed to chose his vote based upon such selection criteria. There can be no supposition by the State, that one mans selection criteria are any more valid than the next mans, and this means that a voter may indeed decide to vote merely based upon knowledge of the observable trend, and it is there RIGHT to be able to use such information as their sole selection criterion. Additionally, secret ballot means simply that NO OTHER PERSON MAY KNOW YOUR VOTE, COMBINED WITH YOUR IDENTITY, (and you are within your rights to waive that, and allow the Election Judges to see your face if you determine them to be the disinterested strangers they are and thusly don't care). "Secret Ballot", in NO WAY implies that any counting/tabulation exercise is even ALLOWED to occur secretly or even be kept from your visible observation. Ballot is known as a piece of paper, but it is more accurately described by its intent: The manner in which a Decider TAKES A PHYSICAL ACTION AND INDICATES THEIR CONTEST DECISION. "Balloting" is an ACT composed of two elements, 'Choosing' and 'Physically Indicating'. The next logical question is, "At what point is the actual VOTE registered and in a FIXED state, as a part of a growing total?" The answer? SOMEWHERE, a number keeping track of an overall total, just incremented up by ONE. This is not merely an assumption, IT MUST ALWAYS BE A TRUE STATEMENT, AND IT MUST BE PROVABLY TRUE. As it is now, the answer to that question is NOBODY KNOWS, because there is no effective way to know. Never before, has there been proposed, a system in which the actual Number of Federal Register is effectively GROWN, in serial order, by its Contest Deciders directly, thus ELIMINATING any need for intermediary documents also known as ballots. A Decider of the contest need only be able to recognize the name of his chosen candidate. IT'S NOT ONLY OUR RIGHT TO TRANSPARENT AND CURRENT INFORMATION, from a standpoint of possession, it is OUR process. Our ability to MONITOR the ongoing process, by necessity requires the public knowledge of the accumulating, displayed number of Federal Record, and our access to this information updated no less frequently than at two minute intervals, and our need for it outweighs ANY partisan concerns of "Influence". It can just as easily be said that it cannot be conclusively determined that any apparent influence was unduly earned, REGARDLESS of the magnitude or polarity of it's perceived effect on Contest Candidates. The argument by Partisans of, "influence" rings HOLLOW in a Contest that is driven by efforts to "Influence", because proclaimed "Reputable" media 'Candidate polls' are allowed up to and during the data collection portion of the contest and have not, nor are they currently, drawing such criticisms of "Influence", from that same group of Partisans, nor are there calls for the corresponding legislation. The same logic which led to inaction in the first set of circumstances, cannot then be used to leap into action and banish knowledge of the GENUINE poll, as it unfolds, in an observably believable manner which is under no individual or groups' ultimate control and cannot be controlled by any means other than the REGISTERED Contest Participants passing through freely of their own accord, without fear or favor, in an identical manner. Criticisms of media based polls comes mainly from a disbelieving public, convinced of attempts to WARP their minds with polling data. The only poll of relevance for the Contest Decider, is in the form of the growing numerical figures he can see as fact and NOT an inaccurate or deliberate attempt to mislead him by way of a deceptive media presentation with a hidden agenda misaligned with his own. Anyone can buy an ad, or launch a campaign to hook people into their point of view. There is NO REASON to believe that any external 'force' of influence entering one's sensory input, is any more effective than a Candidates, or ANY other actor trying to gain their attention and subsequently rewire their mind. This is both irrational as well as highly improbable, unless this is Japan and the flashing message comes from a Pokemon cartoon. If "Influence" were so, then that would mean that someone has figured out "The KEY" to winning elections, remotely, and with mere suggestions, which then STICK, and the Manchurian Candidate-like Decider of the Contest then follows through with! The notion of "External Influence", is not only preposterous, it is a FICTITIOUS CONSTRUCT, who's only potential use is to INSTILL DOUBT and subsequently use that doubt to VOID the very real WILL of those who put the numbers there. Considering that no other person is accompanying a Decider of the Contest as they complete their private act, it cannot be said that something OTHER THAN the Decider's free will, has determined their private action. ALL OF THE EFFORT IS IN VAIN if the Deciders of the Contest have reason to doubt the result, so doubt must therefore be eliminated to the greatest extent practically economically feasible. The Deciders ultimately have only one interest for the fruits of having fulfilled their CIVIC Duty: The FINAL NUMBER, which is a conglomerate of all the other numbers from all the other Polling places, which means that knowledge of the various NUMBERS generated at EACH individual polling place are now of GREAT PUBLIC INTEREST. These numbers, EACH individual total number of Votes for a given candidate, IS a number that is also a Federal Record. Because the contest also includes candidate participants that are exclusively of local relevance, there is local jurisdictional interest as well as State and Federal, thus creating a commingled MULTI-jurisdictional contest with the potential for overlapping jurisdictional disputes in any matters where disputes may arise. There is therefore a necessity to eliminate the possibility of disputes by: a) Resolving all mathematical totals DIRECTLY at each polling place, and DELIBERATELY associating those Federally recorded totals to the specific geographic location of the polling places in which the Contest Deciders constructed the data, Providing a URL for the public to view relevant photographic images of all Numbers of Federal Record, in addition to electronic summations of the identically recorded corresponding data in electronic form. This allows ANY human being, and not just contest participants, to view the numbers of Federal Record from ANY polling place, but most importantly, allows the people from any specific polling place to AFFIRM the accuracy of their own polling place. The ability for the Contest OWNERS (some playing the optional role of Participating in the Contest) to VERIFY is the effective remedy to our Election Dilemma. A perceived DISHONEST SYSTEM is but a waste of time to an individual as that individual's understanding of justice approaches infinity. Eagles do not fly with turkeys! ALL THE RIGHT PEOPLE will return to the Election Contests, PROVIDED THAT they calculate that the exercise is HONEST and therefore worth the personal inconvenience and the physical effort, because there is finally a definitive manner in which we can OUST elected officials from office, and DEFEND them from being ousted and the civil war battlefield stays right where it belongs - At the PUBLIC POLL. CHANGE is the answer to our election system in America, but it must be a SIGNIFICANT enough and MEASURABLE enough change, to be recognizably SUPERIOR when compared to previous open-loop, trust based systems which do not address adequately, the inherent CONFLICT OF INTEREST that those who host elections cannot merely unassign from themselves. The "Ballot" is the Pallet of Candidate counters before you. The token you are issued can now be called the "Vote". Your insertion of the "Vote" serves as the KEY which allows the number displayed on the counter to increment numerically upwards whilst physically collecting the "Vote". The insertion and cranking action are officially known as the "Cast". Let's NOT allow "them" (BAD ACTORS) the opportunity to ADD confusion by adding unnecessary Technology that can only render a picture of a number based upon supporting esoteric software code. Let's NOT allow them (BAD ACTORS) to add additional steps and activities for everyone to FIGHT OVER such as introducing paper in a first data collection exercise performed on the Public side, and a later occurring SECOND EXERCISE to sort and then count all the paper, ERROR FREE, on the NON-PUBLIC, "Observer" side, under hostile conditions. Let's NOT allow them (BAD ACTORS) printing errors or candidate confusion, when we can simply place a new and appropriate placard upon a fresh "Elemental Incremental Vote Counter" and instantly customize it for any political race. Let's NOT allow them to delay, thwart, or otherwise cancel an election Contest, for a reliance upon electricity, for we DO NOT REQUIRE IT to generate the numbers at the appointed time, and need no more than candle light by which to see to complete the task at the same exact pace. The unchangeable numbers of Federal Record can be reported and relayed by any means, even horseback if necessary. (Just in case we go FULLY 3rd World...) We have the ability to SHORT-CIRCUIT ALL OF THE UGLINESS by changing to a system by which we must each and ALL pass through serially and sequentially to DIRECTLY add our votes to the RUNNING TOTAL on a number of Federal Record. The device shown has transparency for illustrative purposes. The final design of the device will be composed of 3D printable components, a short BOM of additional materials, and complete assembly instructions for its large easy to assemble parts. The HOPE is that we print a BUNCH of these things and convince people that a simple, supervised, closed-loop system, can EASILY eliminate all the fighting, FRAUD, and the related fighting OVER the FRAUD! People that understand this concept, BELIEVE in this novel approach to Public elections. With a true GRASS ROOTS movement driven by popular demand, we can see a Constitutional Amendment finally making VOTING DAY the obvious National Holiday it should have been all along, and pinning down a National Standard Method of DATA COLLECTION for all elections Nationwide. This is my personal intellectual property and I hereby declare that this concept may be copied in whole or in part, provided that any party profiting from this concept or profiting from the inspiration provided by this concept agrees to award me one Cent, US for each $10 US such a party realizes in Gross Profit, prior to consideration of operating expenses. This ensures that a person could build a manufacturing business, operate it through time and WELL into the area of profitability, before ever owing me, the creator, any significant amount of remittance, and I'll even sweeten the deal by making the remittance voluntary, or enforceable only upon direct request from me. Just let me know if you have any interest in the 3D .STL Files. I'll keep track of you and send the files once the CAD design is done, printed, assembled,and tested. Also, I am a competent inventor of US Patent 6,142,653 who is intimately familiar with intellectual property laws. (and YES, I do know that by making the PUBLIC disclosures I have, I have in fact reduced any legal claims to my intellectual property to that of nothing more than a Beggar's request, but this isn't about Money, it's about UN-FUCKING a mess.)

This potential discovery could change the WORLD! Am I probably unusual in that I have many memories from age 2 onward? (now 57.3 yrs.) My own daughter is not retentive of her life at age 5 (she's now almost 29). I'm worried about her! That she is so different from me in ability to remember those ages. Perhaps people are simply just 'that different' from one another and there's nothing to be concerned about.

I am so sorry for your loss and I understand every word of it. I ahve worked in research labs for 20+ years looking at diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and cancer. I like to look into the root cause and most of these diseases have more than one root cause. In other words, AD is not one disease. And if someone gets AD beyond 40 years of age ... it's sporadic ... meaning some underlying health issue, usually factored by a lifestyle choice or some environmental toxin, created this. Only 3% of the cases are hereditary, and they hit in the early twenties and not late in life. But great news is .. we have biomarkers that can predict AD 20 years prior and we can 100% take action to prevent it. And this treatment is very hopeful. The researchers have tested this in primates and are looking at human clinical trials soon.

BREAKING: For the first time in 100+ years, Alzheimer's may not be permanent Scientists just reversed advanced Alzheimer's in mice by restoring brain energy balance, eliminating both plaques AND cognitive decline The drug worked in two different animal models, suggesting "this could translate to humans". Game-changing!! sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/… cell.com/cell-reports-m…

@SoldiersWhisper I appreciate what you are going through. I lost my mother when she was way too young as well. Peace be upon you. KNOW that we never die, we're just separated for a time.

“She wasn’t a Marine, but she raised one. US Army Sergeant Connie J Purcott, age 62 (my mom), passed away this morning at the James H Quillen VA Medical Center in Johnson City, TN. She was the best damn mother anyone could ever ask for. She was a fighter and fought till the end. Please honor my mother.” -Josh Purcott, USMC #Family #Mothers #USArmy #USMC #RIP #MilitaryFamily

Walz's words are telling. He says TECH for the distraction, but then REVEALS the true target: SOCIAL MEDIA. It's as close as he can come to directly saying "Elon Musk's X-platform, without actually saying it. Walz isn't as smart as the average bear. He never intended to form a system that treats ALL people equally.

Eventually you run out of other people's money. It hasn't happened yet in Minnesota, but damn if he isn't doing his best to burn through it all and chase the taxpayers away. Also tech companies are not necessarily social media companies. MN has a lot of tech companies here - Adobe, MedTronic, Hewlett Packard, but none of them are social media companies so just who is he planning on taxing? Those who use social media in Minnesota?

@Travis179069263 @Daily_MailUS @Yolo304741 What if they weren't arrested, but just met with tragic accidents that claimed their lives? The "Community" of those who inflict this upon us without consent would soon be 'informed' that we DO NOT TOLERATE BEING EXPERIMENTED UPON!

@Daily_MailUS @Yolo304741 When do people get arrested for this?

CIA accused of 'poisoning the sky' with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda trib.al/GjIe58A

@naomirwolf @UnderSecPD INDUSTRY is where business is conducted. When did the Educational Model shift it's PRIMARY objective from Education to profit? It didn't used to be this way!

Thank GOD for this administration and @UnderSecPD. Parents are going broke funding college educations that simply propagandize the next generation into ignorance about their own legacy and canon and a willingness to embrace collectivist ideologies.

Fully agree. We humans do the best we can but results are always subject to interpretation. Wherever and whenever I see "Targeting", I immediately see INJUSTICE if the NAME of the target precedes the criminal act. When the CRIME is searched for AFTER the name, INJUSTICE BECOMES OBVIOUS.

@ThomasBLarson @nicksortor I’m not questioning human nature — I’m questioning systems. People may aim for justice, but systems often deliver bias

🚨 JUST IN: Literal PLANELOADS of illegals are on their way out of Minneapolis today DESPITE the Democrats’ efforts to block their deportations KEEP DEPORTING, ICE! The American people are BEHIND YOU! 🇺🇸🔥

@LuisSteeven @nicksortor Indeed I am! Enforcement, has now BECOME a political issue when it never should have been. You do see the obvious contrast in philosophies of "Enforcement" between the two parties! There should be NO CONTRAST.

@ThomasBLarson @nicksortor If enforcement shifts with political control, then you’re proving the point it’s not neutral, it’s selective.

@walterkirn Japan's embracing of the teachings of Demming led to their rise! Demming was an AMERICAN. If Japan can, WHY CAN'T WE?

My father the patent lawyer worked during a time when it was believed by many that the American edge would be lost forever to Japan etc. They were so well organized! I asked him if he feared this himself, based on his work in international cases. He said he didn't. Not for the time being. Our freedom of thought and thus our creativity was unrivaled, he said. It would see us through. Let it continue to be so.

@yesnicksearcy As such with EVERYTHING. When the ENVIRONMENT has become toxic, there arises the need to find a NEW environment. GOVERNMENT MEDDLING RUINED THE ENVIRONMENT!

Leftists ruin everything. They have destroyed the film industry in CA. Nothing shoots there. So there is no reason to live there if you are a filmmaker.

@naomirwolf I liked Patty Murray way better when she was Edgar Winter!

Actual insulting lies! Married! Voting! Able to update my records!

@LuisSteeven @nicksortor To be clear. The point I was making was that "Enforcement" appears at this time, to be a high priority for only one political party, which has now created the condition by which Enforcement of Laws is READILY identifiable in one party, while nearly absent in the other.

@ThomasBLarson @nicksortor If enforcement depends on politics, then ‘order vs chaos’ is already decided. The real question is: who gets protected, and who gets targeted?

@GlowSurfing I keep saying this, in hopes of PROPOSED LEGISLATION: "Put a BOUNTY on Fraud!".

And that’s why the liberals will always win…. Thieves protecting thieves

@carolmswain You PROVED the metal in your words, and now you suffer unjustly. You will not be forgotten! The are the REAL deal.

That op-ed destroyed my career and led to my early retirement.

I’m usually right!

@RealSLokhova Sometimes JUSTICE is served by a single bullet. The assassinated INSPIRE their own assassins. Raskin does an effective job of making people ANGRY! All it takes is for the WRONG TYPE OF PERSON to be made angry, and they will assume the role of the Court System.

It’s always worse than we thought And then no one gets prosecuted

@ksorbs Simple. The American People have nearly GIVEN UP on the idea that it can be fixed. MOST do not vote, and those that do only get that far. They need to INVOLVE THEMSELVES in politics or KEEP THEIR COMPLAINING MOUTHS SHUT!

How does someone like this get elected to begin with?

@MattMorseTV PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP is far more important than merely showing an ID. Nobody will be fooled if/when Democrats try the "Bait and Switch".

This is the bait. The is the trap. Do not fall for this. Fetterman, the RINO’s, and the Democrats are going to try to push on a “clean” voter ID bill, dropping the proof-of-citizenship provision, in an effort to make it look like they’ve actually accomplished something. In reality, blue states have been giving out state-issued photo ID’s to illegal aliens for over a decade now. What good are voter ID laws if illegal aliens have state-issued photo ID’s? We must DEMAND proof-of-citizenship.

@Shilohmarx @amyklobuchar It's difficult to CHEAT when your voters get deported! USING A FOREIGN INVASION FORCE TO SECURE A LOCK ON POLITICAL POWER, is just about the most despicable and UN-American thing a political party could visit on the people. We CHOSE where we live BECAUSE it was decidedly AMERICAN

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) won Minnesota by 500,729 votes in 2024. Minnesota processed 471,657 new voter registration applications between 2022 and 2024. These 471,657 applications did not require proof of citizenship. @amyklobuchar

@JonJustice @elonmusk Klobuchar weaseled her way into politics because she has no tangible skills. When people saw the NAME, they voted for her. Her father was a career writer for the Minneapolis Star and Sickle.

How bad are Dems at arguing against the Save America Act? Klob's is back to complaining about @elonmusk Listen to the show live: tinyurl.com/JJTCNT

@LuisSteeven @nicksortor It would appear that the actual ENFORCEMENT OF LAW is now a "Political" issue. Which makes a voter's choice clear: ORDER or CHAOS.

@nicksortor So let’s be clear: Is this about law enforcement… or about sending a political message?