Tim Corbett

@PhenoMVP Naylor has pretty stats against LH pitching this season

@Simi_2210_ 179

If you solve this, you’re different Can you solve ?

@atensnut B.

Careful.

@Airaasayss 42

Most people rush and fail....Don't be one What’s your answer?? 🤔🤔

@ggreenwald @ClayTravis Your negativity is unparalleled Glenn. Glenn Bash the USA Greenwald...

We've been told for 30 years that Iran is like 6 seconds away from getting a nuclear weapon yet they never got one. Tulsi Gabbard said it was because they never opted to have one. Trump didn't accomplish shit other than killing a bunch of Iranians. The regime is in place. They showed their ability to destroy US bases and pound the shit out of Israel. There was no popular uprising. Iranians don't have freedom or democracy. And while Iran doesn't have nukes, they haven't had them for the decades before Trump ran for President. But if letting MAGA feel like you won is the way to stop this war, I'll donate to the victory parade you throw for your leader.

There is a two week ceasefire, Glenn. I’m sorry nuclear war didn’t happen. Honest question, do you agree the world would be safer if North Korea didn’t have nuclear weapons? I wish Clinton had kept that from happening. Iran isn’t going to have nuclear weapons thanks to Trump.

@AriFleischer Great post Ari. Agree 💯

When this is over, the western part of NATO will never be the same. Spain, England, France and Italy have sold us out, as they too often have a history of doing. Eastern European nations are the heart of NATO. They spend money on defense, know how to fight and love the US. France particularly deserves fault and blame. From supporting China and Russia at the UN to denying Americans overflight rights, they’re doing what they’ve always done - showing weakness, while cutting deals with terrorists. (The reason the US has a Marine Corps and Navy is unlike France, we refused to pay a ransom to the Barbary Pirates. France is always happy to cut a deal.) Wars have unintended consequences as nations show their true colors. NATO will never be the same, and Western European weakness and acquiescence is the cause.

@adamthebull And your # 2 candidate was the great Tim Walz. Be proud of that choice! Stick to sports.

I should be surprised that idiots like this have a platform but then I remember we have a moronic President surrounded by his ass kissing nitwits...and it fits perfectly with the times...

We won't stop REPOSTING this clip until everyone who let the criminal walk free is IN PRISON. This is 22-year-old Logan Federico's dad. WATCH as he BLASTS Democrats in Congress. This, after his daughter was dragged from bed, forced on her knees, and executed... ...by a man arrested 39 TIMES with 25 FELONIES!!! It's time to start holding judges and DA's accountable for things like this. REPOST this absolutely everywhere and amplify his voice! #thinblueline #lawenforcement

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

Here it is: RECONFIRMED: CBS—60 Minutes facilitated the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020, as did the 51 intelligence officials. @C__Herridge’s explosive revelation: “CBS executives deliberately buried the Hunter Biden laptop story and ordered her [Catherine Herridge] to wait until after the 2022 midterms to help the Democratic Party.” Now arrest Leslie Stahl. Arrest the bitch. Arrest them all for fraud, election interference, racketeering, campaign finance violations, and conspiracy to overthrow the United States government on November 3, 2020. 📝The corporate media was in on the overthrow—every single one of them, including fox.

BREAKING - Numerous women, including a 19-year-old teenager, have come forward to blow the whistle on California Rep. and governor candidate Eric Swalwell, claiming he has been sleeping with his interns and staffers and forcing them to sign NDAs to keep quiet.

Wow

🚨 Fetterman Drops a Bomb on Oprah: Senator John Fetterman just exposed how Oprah Winfrey allegedly tried to buy his vote on the “Big Beautiful Bill.” “She had her assistant approach me and offer me $20 million to vote against the bill,” Fetterman told the Senate Oversight Committee. “I told her that’s not how our country works.” He immediately informed Democrat leadership. Their response? “They swept it under the rug.” A Democrat senator turning down $20M from one of the most powerful liberals in America — and his own party buried it. Integrity over cash. Rare sight in DC. What do you think — real stand or political theater? 👇 #Fetterman #Oprah #BigBeautifulBill

🚨Double standard in the NBA exposed:🚨 Steve Kerr can accuse the Trump administration of "murder" and call out the government for lying — no problem. Doc Rivers can rip the president and ICE as a "travesty" and a bad example for kids — totally fine. But let a player like Jaden Ivey speak his Christian faith, call out Pride Month as celebrating unrighteousness, or question certain "religions" that don't lead to salvation in Christ... and the Chicago Bulls waive him for "conduct detrimental to the team." One side gets a megaphone to attack the President daily. The other gets fired for offending the wrong group. The NBA (and Chicago Bulls) make it crystal clear: attacking conservatives and Christians is protected speech. Biblical truth is a career-ender. I stand with Jaden Ivey. Faith over fear. Truth over tolerance theater. Who else sees the hypocrisy? 🔥 #StandWithIvey #NBAHypocrisy #ChristianAthlete

🚨 $2 Trillion Later, The Green Revolution Collapsed: How Chasing Weather Power Bankrupted the Grid and Cost the World $40 Trillion in Growth Between 2010 and 2026, governments and corporations poured roughly $2 trillion into solar, wind, and “net‑zero” programs under the promise of an imminent clean‑energy transition. What the public received instead was an illusion—a fragile grid, higher electricity prices, and negligible climate benefits. Energy remained just as carbon‑intensive, but far more expensive and unreliable. The fundamental error was confusing installed capacity with delivered power. Wind and solar often produce energy only 20 % of the time; fossil and nuclear plants generate 60‑90 % consistently. Billions went to weather‑dependent infrastructure that must still be backed up by coal and gas. Once backups, grid stabilization, and battery losses are factored in, true delivered costs for renewables reach $120–250 per MWh, double or triple those of gas, coal, or nuclear. When measured by physical reality rather than marketing slogans, that $2 trillion bought roughly the energy output of $400 billion in conventional power. It displaced almost no fossil fuel consumption and arguably reinforced it, since idling backup plants waste fuel. Worse, dependence on Chinese supply chains for solar panels and rare‑earth minerals eroded national energy independence and inflated emissions through hidden mining and shipping costs. If that same capital had been spent on modern nuclear or advanced natural‑gas infrastructure, the outcome would have been transformative. $2 trillion could have built about 285 GW of nuclear capacity (powering 250 million homes reliably for 70 years) or 1,650 GW of efficient gas plants (enough for 900 million homes for 30 years). Either path would have cut 70–80 gigatons of CO₂, reduced global electricity costs by half, and created genuine energy security. Instead, the current “green” trajectory delivered rising utility bills, rolling blackouts, and greater reliance on geopolitical adversaries. Global power costs rose roughly 60%, contributing to deindustrialization in Europe, worldwide inflation, and a cumulative $37–40 trillion loss in global GDP—about half of one year of global economic output. That’s the price of mistaking ideology for engineering. The lesson could not be clearer: physics determines prosperity. Dense, dispatchable energy such as nuclear or gas remains the backbone of civilization, and no amount of subsidies or messaging can legislate thermodynamics. The so‑called green transition did not decarbonize the planet—it impoverished it. The road to sustainability is not paved with solar subsidies but with unapologetic engineering and scientific honesty.

@Vince_Cellini @MarchMadnessMBB Amazing how poorly they shot the three until crunch time

As good as it gets. Incredible! Huskies never quit and Mullins made his only 3 to win it and join UConn legends. The tournament never disappoints. @MarchMadnessMBB

@nobleisawinner Funny! No

Thoughts White people, does this shirt offend you..??

@Vince_Cellini @kennewickmike Watched Barry at Richfield in 1976. Spent the first half pouting 35’ away from the basket totally uninvolved in his offense. JERK.

@kennewickmike Averaged 35.6 ppg in his second year in the league. Without a 3 point line. A phenomenal player. Ask him lol.

"John Stockton was perhaps the most underappreciated player ever to play the game. & that as much as I admired Larry Bird as both a player and a competitor, I wasn’t sure that Rick Barry hadn’t been just as great"-Jerry West

@Vince_Cellini @MikeBellATL Plate was 24” wide for Glavine Maddox and Smoltz - maybe more!

@MikeBellATL But no complaints about ‘95 v Cle? Lol

Still boggles the mind nearly 30 years later.

This is spot-on.