



särrçs
50.2K posts

@Timotheishere
i try to write about tokenomics | on-chain ranger |







how has sitting idle made you money? I guess not. how about sitting at your desk, but using your pc to explore the internet? this one definitely made you money. same thing works with stablecoins, they hardly have an effect from the market they just store up as savings, with no exploration that is changing with @RiverdotInc , just like how you can explore the internet and make money from your desk stablecoins can be used to earn, leverage, and scale across different ecosystems natively using their native satUSD. working money is definitely good money right? @River4fun



2/ We’re choosing 5 lucky winners to win $50 in CyClaw credits! If you’ve created your CyClaw, QRT this post with: 1. A screenshot of you chatting with your CyClaw agent 2. Something you’ve accomplished with the help of your agent Entries close at 12pm UTC on Friday, March 20.










perle would've turned out differently during the inf0fi era, id explain so they list on the kait0 LB announcing 1% of their TS for the yapdrop campaign we start lying through our teeth about how it's building the next cure for cancer, and eradicating world's hunger you tag me to your lies to gib it an inner ct touch of excellence and you earn humongous y4ps from it on tge, i get high 5 figs and you get very high 2 figs i post allos and tell you why you should work hard and build a brand, and you glazingly tell me congratulations with hope that i reply again for another y4p feast and yes you earn y4ps again cos i did reply so you see, i go home with 5 figs, you go home with high 2 figs and immaculate y4ps, and we live richily ever after



🦭 Walrus turns one and we want to hear YOUR voice. Write about why verifiable data matters–the tech, the use cases, the vision–for a chance to win up to $1000 in WAL. Share your take as a thread, article, or whatever format works for you. 🏆 Prizes 1st place: $1000 in WAL 2nd place: $600 in WAL 3rd place: $400 in WAL How to enter: 1. Write your take on why verifiable data matters (600 words minimum) 2. Post it to X as a thread, X article, or long form post 3. Reply to this post with a link to your submission 4. Tag @WalrusProtocol in your post Submit by April 17. Full details: 👇


𝗺𝘆 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗮 𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗹. it was when i sat down, opened the docs, and actually read the tokenomics. -> let me explain why that matters and i’ll use something you already know. remember when FIFA 23 ultimate team got exposed for rigged pack odds? EA had been publishing “probability rates” for years. looked fair on paper. but data investigators ran thousands of pack openings and found the actual numbers didn’t match what was advertised. EA was telling players one thing and doing another behind closed doors. nobody could verify anything because everything happened inside EA’s servers. you just had to trust them. that’s exactly how most crypto projects handle their token allocations. they publish nice pie charts, write “community first” in bold, then quietly give the team a backdoor - early unlocks, cliff exceptions, “strategic partner” carve-outs that let insiders dump before the community even gets their tokens. -> @perlelabs did something different. team tokens are on the same or stricter vesting schedule as community tokens. tokens unlock gradually for everyone, with the same rules for team, investors, and contributors…it’s simple. everyone (founders, investors, early backers) locked up just as tight as the people actually doing the annotation work. -> then i looked at who built this. the founding team came out of Scale AI - the company that built a $29 billion data labeling operation and landed a $300 million contract with the US Department of Defense. these aren’t people writing whitepapers about problems they’ve never touched. they’ve run annotation pipelines at that scale. they know exactly what breaks and where people cut corners. -> that’s when it clicked. in a space full of projects where the structure contradicts the pitch - perle’s structure matched the words. that’s rare. that’s the moment.