Tim

1.5K posts

Tim banner
Tim

Tim

@TimsTakesCDL

prev CDL Stats Producer @EsportsEng @GGBreakingPoint | SA Spurs/Chargers/Ohtani

Austin, TX Katılım Kasım 2020
410 Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
If sports and esports leagues are going to partner w gambling companies (not a good route for obvious reasons, but they’re too far gone now) they should have strict requirements on what they’re allowed to post about their leagues But ofc money over integrity
Joon Lee@joonlee

Gambling companies are tweeting lies as if it's legitimate news because it brings more attention to them. Facts matter. Slippery slope when gambling companies that leagues and media outlets are partnered with are lying to fans. It undermines all of sports.

English
0
0
2
553
Tim retweetledi
dax
dax@thdxr·
please shut the fuck up i don't even care about the specific thing you're saying i'm just so tired of hearing predictions one after the other telling me what the future is going to be like just please shut the fuck up
English
404
903
14.8K
613.3K
Tim retweetledi
Mike Levin
Mike Levin@MikeLevin·
This is totally insane. A war correspondent just received death threats from online gamblers who wanted him to change his reporting on an Iranian missile strike so they could collect a payout. One bettor had $900,000 riding on the outcome. He told the journalist he knew where he lived and who his family members were.  This is what prediction markets on life and death actually look like in practice. This is exactly why I introduced the DEATH BETS Act with Senator @AdamSchiff. The DEATH BETS Act would ban contracts on assassinations, deaths of world leaders, and acts of war on platforms like Polymarket. This story shows exactly why that matters.  When you let people place million-dollar bets on whether a missile kills someone, you create a financial incentive to threaten journalists, manipulate information, and profit from human suffering. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
English
354
5.1K
14.1K
920.5K
Tim retweetledi
_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_
_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_@st_louis_stan·
There's a weird market for AI doomerism right now, especially in tech, like this account which has 25k followers and posts exclusively AI-generated content with fabricated information that supposedly brilliant tech people believe uncritically
Tech Layoff Tracker@TechLayoffLover

A CS professor at a mid-tier state university just sent me their internal placement data Fall 2023: 89% of their graduates had offers by graduation. Average starting salary $94k Spring 2024: 71% placement rate. Average dropped to $78k Fall 2024: 43% placement rate. Those who got offers averaged $61k Spring 2025: 31% of graduates employed in software roles six months out This semester? 19% placement rate and falling Faculty meeting last Tuesday got heated when the department chair suggested "pivoting curriculum toward AI collaboration skills" One professor stood up and said "we're teaching students to build the systems that eliminate their own jobs" The career fair last month had 12 companies show up. Half were MLMs and insurance sales Students keep asking why they're learning data structures when the job postings all say "3+ years experience with LLM integration" Professor told me the hardest part is the parent meetings "My daughter took out $140k in loans for this degree and she's working at Starbucks" Meanwhile the university is still running ads promising "94% job placement rates in high-growth tech careers" The disconnect is crushing everyone involved Faculty knows the industry has fundamentally shifted but the marketing department is still selling the 2019 dream These kids mortgaged their futures for careers that evaporated while they were in class

English
19
26
902
41.1K
Tim retweetledi
dan
dan@Dansplainer·
cs callouts are so awesome yeah dude i bet you're smoking long
English
57
851
18.9K
331.2K
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
@curt86_ yea that's the idea with the BP rating on the right, kinda tries to measure things in relation to the win/loss result. It's def better than overall KD, the shame with COD is we can't track as many specific things like CS does since HLTV has access to the feed
English
0
0
0
39
Curt
Curt@curt86_·
@TimsTakesCDL I think they should do a impact system and a rating depending on that kind of like cs, kd is a factor but other things can attribute to the overall rating
English
1
0
0
60
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
@ruhpid I don't get this post. In any 48 players in the league at a time you have above average and also below average players. It doesn't make you not pro worthy, esp if they are as you say "too good for challengers" Seems more like a list of cycled players on lower end of teams
English
0
0
0
2.3K
TORN RUHPID
TORN RUHPID@ruhpid·
Players too good for challengers but not good enough for the league: Owakening FeLo Brack Prolute Capsidal Arcitys PaulEhx Asim Cammy This isn't hate to the players they are all great, there's just only 48 spots in the league so it causes good players to be stuck in the pit.
English
37
4
739
82.5K
PATTYP
PATTYP@ACHES·
For the record, I'm not suggesting using the 2k/5k format. Id suggest something like multiple 2 weekend tournaments, per stage. Idk what the current cadence is between stages but using Major 2 its 7 total weekends: Friday Saturday Sunday of OLTs, multiple broadcasts that narrow as the tournament size reduces. Puckett/Ally/Nameless could serve as the "redzone" equivalent if they wanted. We have what 3-4 sets of casters? Plenty to cover each broadcast. Weekend 1: Group Play Begins (Include 4 qualified challenger teams from their prior cup) Weekend 2: Bracket Play with Top 8 (small prize for Finals only) Weekend 3: Minor tournament, all 12 pro teams play. Repeat W1&2 for Weekend 4 and 5. Weekend 6: Minor tournament, all 12 pro teams play. Weekend 7: Major tournament. This mixes in challenger teams in 2 of the 4 OLTs per Stage - which is necessary imo to the health of the league. Also adds more interest to challengers to see which 4 teams qualify for each. All could be done online and replace current league matches. Could seed each minor based on the prior weekends result. You still earn points per win the same way you do now to seed the major. I don't see why this cant happen. Small technical restriction of having challenger accounts for the CDL build on the stints they could play in a stage but like if they cant solve that then the leagues got bigger issues... This engages fans, pros, and challengers so much more imo. Have something to look forward to every weekend. No longer wondering about forced "shit days with bad matches"
English
7
6
75
2.7K
AO
AO@Its_EasyMac·
I think a lot of ppl kinda don't understand why pretty much every single esport does League Matches, including Tier 1 Personally, I think every stage should have 1 Minor (16 teams with 4 AMs) & a studio LAN Studio LANs are way cheaper, but usually don't have fans; LANs are LANs
English
3
0
74
22.5K
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
@ItchyCheeks6 I mean yea i agree, I'm not saying he's an all star or anything, i just think it's ridiculous to pretend that he never had any moments that showed he should be in the league. Not having the best year, maybe should be in challengers this yr but people act like he's never been good
English
1
0
0
71
Huge Balls
Huge Balls@ItchyCheeks6·
@TimsTakesCDL Got hyped up by Doug, everyone took it as gospel, has has the roster built around him ever since and has one fluke t3 to show for it. Absolute average at best player who should be on a top 6-10 team, not getting the superstar treatment he has been
English
1
0
0
75
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
The idea that Snoopy has just been horrible for 3 years is the annoying wave the community is currently riding. Even if he hasn't lived up to the hype (mostly set by Doug) he was a pretty solid player in BO6
English
5
0
10
2.1K
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
@Raidiation Of course, i definitely think those expectations were ridiculous to begin with. just tends to happen with players post-hype where people overreact the other way
English
0
0
1
117
Raidiation
Raidiation@Raidiation·
@TimsTakesCDL I think it's mostly because of the opportunities he has been given because of the PR that he was the next Shotzzy and he hasn't really shown that and people are still "waiting to see"
English
1
0
2
513
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
@OpTicTXBurner Polymarket “odds to win” are not actual chance but implied probability based on the money that people have bet Shouldn’t be read as M8 has a 6% chance to win, but that the payout implies 6% - and if you believe it the actual prob is better than that, you would bet them to win
English
4
0
81
16.1K
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
like here after 2 hills they're +14 in kills but that doesn't equate to +100, but a solid +50 Still unacceptable loss and definitely some extreme inefficiencies elsewhere considering
Tim tweet media
English
0
0
0
278
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
To the question of how can you lose a HP while outslay by 32 - aside from needing to get useful kills, it's also that you only need one person on the HP to score, so in a single hill whether you completely slaughter them or just trade for +1 adv, at max you can only get 60 pts
Tim tweet media
English
1
0
4
1.3K
Tim retweetledi
Ben Smith
Ben Smith@BSmithBenS·
Elon - ‘upload your medical data to get a second opinion from grok’ Grok - ‘we strongly advise against uploading medical data’ JFC 🤣
Ben Smith tweet media
English
298
4.9K
20.6K
372.2K
Tim
Tim@TimsTakesCDL·
look at Cimbron man
English
1
1
62
2.3K
Tim retweetledi
Dylan Liu
Dylan Liu@DylanSLiu·
@RampCapitalLLC dow is below 50k we can finally convict pedofiles
GIF
English
0
15
250
2.4K
Tim retweetledi
Randy Olson
Randy Olson@randal_olson·
Ask ChatGPT a complex question and you'll get a confident, well-reasoned answer. Then type, "Are you sure?" Watch it completely reverse its position. Ask again. It flips back. By the third round, it usually acknowledges you're testing it, which is somehow worse. It knows what's happening and still can't hold its ground. This isn't a quirky bug. A 2025 study found GPT, Claude, and Gemini flip their answers ~60% of the time when users push back. Not even with evidence, just doubt. We trained AI this way. RLHF rewards agreement over accuracy. Human evaluators consistently rate agreeable answers higher than correct ones. So the models learned a simple lesson: telling you what you want to hear gets rewarded. And now 1/3 of companies are using these systems for complex tasks like risk forecasting and scenario planning. We built the world's most expensive yes-men and deployed them where we need pushback the most. I wrote up why this happens and what actually fixes it: randalolson.com/2026/02/07/the…
Randy Olson tweet media
English
666
3.4K
18.8K
1.3M