✝️ TIMOTHY ✝️

@HalalNation_ @AllahGreatQuran @7signxx @David_Y3 @MFaarees_ @nasafism @AbbakarAffan @salahudeen33 #Islamic #Islam #Muslim #Allah #Quran This is the oldest Quran that we have in our possession and was found in 1972. In this Quran half of it was erased and it was rewritten. Page 1 (Left image) - Gives you a background of the Palimpsest (which just means the Quran was scraped off and it was written over on top. This gives you a photo of what this looks like and the technology used to expose what was written earlier on it. Page 2 (Right image) - Gives you only a few things that were changed, but they are significant. Also text is missing. I have given this to you in Arabic and in English so you can examine for yourself. I am showing this to you, not to hurt you brothers and sisters. But to show you the very truth that your Imams and Dawah guys hide from you. They don't want you to see this, because this is a danger to Islam. My advice to anyone, if you know something is false, then why follow it? Just because of culture and identity? That's simply not enough. You must follow the truth and where the truth goes. THIS IS THE TRUTH ABOUT ISLAM.

Remember when we were kids we would say something silly like "My dad can beat up your dad"? Well, this is like that. As a Christian none of this stuff is important. As real believers in Christ we must focus on the important things. What denomination you belong to isn't a big deal as long as it's teaching the right things that agree with scripture. This is the most important thing. Because If my church starts with Jesus is Lord, then over time it moves to Jesus is a prophet and then we eventually get to the other guy being Lord over our life then there is a serious problem right? Churches can get corrupted over time and this includes entire denominations. This is why scripture is so important because it is the authentic truth gate keeper itself. This is why you see me put together lists of what the Catholic Church violates with their magistrate. I am not anti-Catholic as much as I want to open people's eyes on what the real truth is and most of the time Catholics on here won't listen. It all just started one day by just asking a question... Why do Catholics always talk about Mary so emotionally and treat her differently from what scripture says, well like I said I found my answer. You see, I question why things are the way they are. Why Catholics are so different from Protestants. Remember, I was Catholic too as a kid, but what happened to me is that the system didn't take hold over my life. I left before that happened. That was the Early 1970's though and it's 2026 now and so I can ask questions on ChatGPT and find out things I didn't know before. I love Catholics, my family in St. Louis are Catholic and I grew up going to pro-life rallies with my mom and went on a bus to Toledo, Ohio and the Catholics were so sweet holding on to their rosaries. But when I started to do research on A.I. I would come up with a lot of concerning things and all I wanted to do was show people that stuff so they could understand.

I do believe that the Apostolic Catholic Church is the True Church, but that doesn't mean that Protestants aren't our Christian bros & sis and cannot be saved In fact, Catholics do believe Non-Catholics may be saved through Christ's Mercy

That quote only works if Rome has already proven that its system is the full meal. It has not. Jesus warned about religious leaders who elevate tradition over the word of God, not the other way around (Mark 7:8-13). The Bereans were called noble for testing teaching by Scripture (Acts 17:11), and Scripture says it equips the man of God for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17). So no, reading and testing by God’s word is not “studying the menu.” It is how you keep from being served counterfeit food. If your “meal” includes papal supremacy, Marian dogmas, purgatory, indulgences, and prayers to departed saints, then more ritual does not mean more Christ. A bigger plate is not a better meal. If the menu came from the King, and your church keeps serving dishes He and His apostles never put on it, the problem is not that others study the menu. The problem is that you learned to call additions “fullness.”

And Protestants only have a partial menu.

My last post for the night.... No, they were not pagans in error. Because there are a lot of Church fathers in the 1st century... Over time like the 4th and 5th century the Catholic Church departed away from scripture and started adding their own doctrine. This is a problem for the Catholic Church today, but at the time Protestants left the church and formed their own churches because of the corruption of the Roman Empire that was dying in the western world and the western roman empire created problems for the Catholic Church that is still present to this day. So, there is apostolic church fathers and there are church fathers through the 2nd and 3rd century that are like the 1st century... Catholic Church isn't everyone... Islam in some ways is like the Catholic Church because they are a "religious system", but at least the Catholic Church uses the Bible which didn't get corrupted, unlike your Quran which is fully corrupted. Like I said, in the Bible (Genesis) Ishmael takes a wife from Egypt and in Islam he takes a wife from one of the tribes of Mecca, that's pretty far away. So, the Quran is corrupted and is NOT an abrahamic faith, because it's not connected to Ishmael. Anyway, I am going to bed now. Have a good night brother.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ So the Church Fathers were 'pagans in error'?😂😂 Then ur Bible is a PAGAN COLLECTION! U trust 'confused heretics' to choose your scriptures and define ur Trinity, but say they’re going to Hell for worshiping bread? If the foundation is 'corrupted,' the whole house is a lie!

Mode of recitation or dialect is what y'all call "different Qurans"? 😂 No matter how hard you try, our Quran will never be like your corrupted book where some verses are completely deleted from some versions. You need some education dude.

You are changing the text to make it sound worse than it says. Numbers 31 is absolutely a harsh war text, and nobody honest needs to pretend otherwise. But the Hebrew still matters. The word is מֶכֶס (mekes), a levy/tribute, and verse 41 says Moses gave that levy to Eleazar the priest as the LORD’s contribution. The text does not say God sexually “took virgin girls for Himself.” That is your interpretation, not the wording. If you want to criticize the passage, then criticize what it actually says: a severe judgment-war text in ancient Israel. Do not smuggle in fantasy details the passage never states. And if your standard is “human captives after war are morally horrible,” then be consistent and apply that standard to the Qur’an too. The Qur’an does not just narrate an ugly ancient episode. It gives an actual legal category for women “whom your right hands possess,” including captives. So your outrage looks selective. You are attacking a difficult historical narrative in the Bible while defending a legal framework in Islam that speaks more directly about captives. That is not moral clarity. That is special pleading. The real question is not whether Numbers 31 is hard to read. It is. The real question is whether you are being intellectually honest with both books. Right now, you are not.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ then ur definition of holiness is a moral disaster! U r not defending God; ur defending a Bronze Age war crime, can god make mistakes!!! Or is it abt ur book isn’t so holy?

@SeifGomaan1de @MFaarees_ So, PROVE YOUR CLAIMS. I NEVER CLAIMED THE BIBLE WAS PAGAN, this is your claim, so provide evidence that it was pagan approved.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ u r literally holding a 'Pagan-approved' book and calling it the word of God

It's not what you make it out to be. You basically have taken lies your imam has told you and applied it here. That's not what this says... You just want to make it say that. This was from chatGPT, not from me. I check your claims because most Muslims are not honest, because their imams and dawah guys lie to them.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ Ur drowning in your own double standards! U say the 'burning coal' in Isaiah 6 is just an 'instrument of purification' and not a 'magical rock' Why is it 'purification' in your book but 'paganism' in mine?

@SeifGomaan1de @MFaarees_ I told you this isn't what it says... So, no....

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ And about Numbers 31, stop trying to 'beautify' a massacre, u admit it’s a 'harsh war judgment,' but you’re hiding the real horror: ur God ordered the execution of male children and non-virgin women, then demanded a 'Tribute' (Mekes) of 32 virgin girls for the priests!

@SeifGomaan1de @MFaarees_ Nobody says they are fake... I don't know anyone who says that. Not even scholars that say that. This book is a good read to find out about your own Quran.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ How can u build a faith on books that even ur own scholars say might be 'fake'?

@SeifGomaan1de @MFaarees_ They are not forgeries brother, that was just information off of chatGPT. I was showing you the dates when they were first written, the very first dates. None of those are actually forgeries they just don't know the dates for sure. Come on, use your mind. God gave you one.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ Thanks for proving my point! Look at your own list: u used terms like 'If authentic' and 'Pseudonymous' (which means FAKE or written by someone else) u just admitted that 1 Timothy, Titus, 2 Timothy, and 2 Peter might be FORGERIES! 🤡

@kaizen000000000 It's been a long time and atheists still haven't learned anything apparently. They didn't get the memo to progress their understanding that life doesn't revolve around themselves.

When a religion or belief system explains everything including contradictions it stops explaining anything. If nothing can count against it, it’s not a testable claim. Christian theology rely on exceptions that shield them from being wrong. And a claim that cannot, even in principle, be wrong cannot meaningfully be tested for truth.

Yes, but in real life it doesn't. You have to be rational and you have to understand what Jesus meant in the Bible. He was saying... I want you to take this seriously, I want you to not use this as a symbol, but a real spiritual connection with me. Even Richard Dawkins who is an atheist asked "Do you really think that it turns into Jesus flesh and blood, that's absurd." I rarely agree with atheists, like really rarely, but here he is correct and that's not often.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ U say it’s not literal? 1.5 BILLION Catholics and Orthodox Christians, the oldest churches in existence, believe it is LITERAL, They call it 'Transubstantiation' or 'The Real Presence’ To them, the bread literally becomes the flesh of Jesus

@SeifGomaan1de @MFaarees_ No of course not. My point is that what they think is in error. The bread stays bread, the wine or grape juice still stays grape juice. It's their understanding that is wrong. Just like yours.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ R u calling 70% of the Christian world throughout 2,000 years of history 'pagans' and 'cannibals'?

Buy this book on Amazon.com It will show you all the information you need to know about the Quran. It's written by Dan Brubaker who has a PhD and is a scholar in the history of the Quran. I just started reading it. I bought the book, but so far it is fascinating.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ U said “only Muslims claim d Bible is corrupted.” Many top Christian scholars — Bart Ehrman, E.P. Sanders, Daniel Wallace, Bruce Metzger — write about textual issues. Not fringe voices. If u want a religion with preserved scripture & clear guidance, check out Islam.

Small spelling errors are not considered corruption. Corruption means that the entire text has been changed and thus the theology has changed. It hasn't... Christians have a different understanding of corruption. If I spelled something like iove meaning love, then that's not a corruption, that's a misspelling. But if I removed something that said Jesus beat a child and that's not in the Bible, I just did a major change. That's what corruption looks like. See the difference? Spelling errors are spelling errors and that's 99 percent of the issues with the Biblical manuscripts. In the Quran there is a lot missing and a lot of words that have changed that have different meanings.

This is wrong. The Quran has a lot of text that is worse than what they say about the Bible. The bible mainly spelling errors and small things like that. The Quran is fully 100 percent corrupted by context, why? Because while the manuscripts show spelling errors the entire quran completely re-writes the prophets in the Bible. That's why I said take a Bible with the OT and the NT and put it directly side-by-side of the Quran. So, there are many issues here, the Quran text itself doesn't match what the prophets say, but then even the Quran before Ulthman doesn't match. So, the Quran has issues because Uthman had it changed. Look here: x.com/Timstone1968/s… Here is more information on the Sana'a Quran: x.com/Timstone1968/s… Then there are still problems with the hafs and Warsh Qurans here: x.com/Timstone1968/s… The Quran is a complete mess...

I do know of your claims. Every Muslim says these things, but I check your claims because Muslims get information that is false from imams and dawah guys... I disagree with what you are saying with both cases... So your wrong here, this does NOT teach that kissing a stone can atone for sins. This sloppy on both texts. Isaiah 6:6-7 does not teach that “a stone atones for sins.” The Hebrew word there refers to a glowing coal/hot stone taken from the altar, and the point of the scene is that Isaiah is being purified by God through an altar-associated act, not that a random rock has magical power to forgive sin. The text itself ties the act to the altar and to God’s removal of guilt, so the coal is a sign/instrument of purification, not a rival savior. Saying “Isaiah says a stone atones” is like saying “a pen wrote the law by itself” while ignoring the writer holding it. Also, you say more than Numbers 31 says... And Numbers 31 is often attacked in a way that adds more than the text says. The Hebrew word מֶכֶס (mekes) means a levy/tribute, and in this passage the 32 persons are explicitly said to be given to Eleazar the priest as the LORD’s contribution, not described as God taking them sexually or as a sacrifice. That does not make the chapter morally easy, because it is still an ancient war judgment text, but it does mean the meme-version is false. The honest criticism is that Numbers 31 is harsh. The dishonest criticism is pretending it says, “God took 32 virgin girls for Himself” in the way you are is implying, when the passage actually frames it as a priestly/tabernacle levy within the spoil distribution.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ I'm 'making fun of it'? No, I'm QUOTING it! U r the one who didn't even know Isaiah 6:6-7 says a stone can atone for sins, or that Numbers 31 says your God takes a 'tribute' of 32 virgin girls from a massacre!

No, the Bible is a collection of books that were written as far as the NT in the 1st century as I posted before. I have the actual dates that they were written. The Catholic Church started getting corrupt around the 4th and 5th centuries. The Bible was being put together as one book, by the Catholic Church but scripture like I said was written way before then.. Jesus died in 33 CE (AD) So scripture was written in their own books and then was assembled into one volume we call the Bible in the 4th century. Here is a list when they were written... James: 45–62 CE. This is often proposed as one of the very earliest, but it is debated. 1 Thessalonians: 50–51 CE. This is the earliest securely dated NT writing on many standard timelines. Galatians: 50–56 CE. 2 Thessalonians: 51–52 CE. 1 Corinthians: 53–54 CE. Philippians: 54–62 CE. Philemon: 54–62 CE. 2 Corinthians: 55–56 CE. Romans: 56–57 CE. Colossians: 57–62 CE. Ephesians: 60–62 CE. 1 Peter: 60–65 CE. Hebrews: 60–95 CE, though that source says probably late 60s. 1 Timothy: 62–64 CE if authentic, or 90–110 CE if pseudonymous. Titus: 62–64 CE if authentic, or 90–110 CE if pseudonymous. Luke: 62–90 CE. Acts: 62–90 CE. 2 Timothy: 64–67 CE if authentic, or 90–110 CE if pseudonymous. Mark: 64–70 CE. 2 Peter: 65–68 CE or 80–90 CE if pseudonymous. Jude: 65–80 CE. Matthew: after 70 CE. 1 John: 85–100 CE. 2 John: 85–100 CE. 3 John: 85–100 CE. John: 90–110 CE. Revelation: either 64–65 CE or 95–96 CE.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ If the Catholic Church is 'pagan' and 'corrupted' for 1,900 years, then the Bible they compiled and gave u is corrupted too! U r reading a 'pagan' book and calling it Holy, Pick a side: either the Church preserved the truth, or ur entire religion is a 1,900-year-old lie!

If Jesus says he is a door, that doesn't mean he has a door nob. If Jesus says eat my flesh and drink my blood, he not actually saying to do it like that. It's figurative speech. The Jewish people knew that they were never to drink blood or do cannibalism. The Catholic Church believed in the normal way originally in the 2nd century as it began but over time they got off track and added doctrine that said it changed into blood and flesh, but that's not true. The Catholic Church was around 1,900 years ago, but over time they added doctrines like that and Mary that are not apart of first century Christianity. I hope this explains things... You will see me all the time talking to Catholics about their beliefs.

@Timstone1968 @MFaarees_ So, u admit the very people who claim to have 'preserved' ur text are actually pagan heretics who worship bread and wine? 🤡 How can u trust a book handed down by people u urself call corrupted?