Tom

@ASavageNation I am actively involved in habitat management. We can conserve environmental resources without the draconian, obstructionist policies that were championed in your heyday.

@Tnv70 conservatism means conserve, not exploit. You are actually a destroyer, like the radical left.

DESTROY BABY, DESTROY: after 50 yrs of protection. Trump, Ending Decades of Protection, Opens Wild Habitats to Drilling and Mining nytimes.com/2026/07/10/cli…

@ASavageNation Mike’s right about this one.

AIR FORCE ONE from QATAR- I warned at the outset SECURITY CONCERNS. should have had POTUS reject this trojan horse; Now Trump won't fly home on it from Turkey. Was I right?

@TKRok9 @Theholisticpsyc Is it really manipulation if we are referring to the implementation of knowledge and logic? That seems to me be to be a respectful way to navigate a disagreement.

@Theholisticpsyc Some of the best manipulators will also use tremendous knowledge and logic. When you don't have the knowledge they've prepared, all the other tactics on here become even more effective for them. But you still don't have to give in. You can tell them you'll get back to them.

Manipulation is the only way some people know how to get their needs met. It's not personal, it's a lack of capacity. How To Deal with Manipulation:

Very useful critical thinking guide

@whatifalthist In a history 102 you gave three reading suggestions. I’d like to ask you for a 3 book suggestion on topics you have studied. As an example: I would love suggested reading on what precipitated and drove the baby boomers cultural awakening. Especially the origins of the leaders

Y’know you guys can just ask me random questions on the topics I cover like anthropology, history, philosophy, culture, geopolitics and I’ll answer. Ask me questions here and I’ll answer until I get bored.

@curtdoolittle This fleshes out the assertion I have encountered that feminism (3rd wave especially) was a weapon deployed against Western civilization. That observation is proof of misogyny and cause for further abuse by the feminized establishment

WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININE GIVEN Sex Differences in Cognition: Feminine vs Masculine In Time vs Over Time Empathizing vs Systematizing Consuming vs Capitalizing Irresponsibility vs Responsibility Devotion vs Loyalty Small Scale vs Large Scale Herd vs Packs Global vs National Dysgenic vs Eugenic Devolutionary vs Evolutionary Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive) AND GIVEN Sex Differences in Limits: Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear. --vs-- Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear. THEREFORE Males must take responsibility for imposing limits on feminine hyperconsumption and limit feminine consumption to capital production and responsibility for it: Reproduction and the production of responsible offspring capable of continuous evolution under a condition of prosperity. OTHERWISE The feminine will destroy the civilization from within by hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibility for continuing the western tradition of maximization of individual responsibility for private and common producing a continuously eugenic and evolutionary and prosperous society.

Hilaire Belloc on the difference between the barbarian and the civilized man: "The Barbarian hopes — and that is the mark of him, that he can have his cake and eat it too. He will consume what civilization has slowly produced after generations of selection and effort, but he will not be at pains to replace such goods, nor indeed has he a comprehension of the virtue that has brought them into being. Discipline seems to him irrational, on which account he is ever marveling that civilization, should have offended him with priests and soldiers.... In a word, the Barbarian is discoverable everywhere in this, that he cannot make: that he can befog and destroy but that he cannot sustain; and of every Barbarian in the decline or peril of every civilization exactly that has been true. We sit by and watch the barbarian. We tolerate him in the long stretches of peace, we are not afraid. We are tickled by his irreverence; his comic inversion of our old certitudes and our fixed creed refreshes us; we laugh. But as we laugh we are watched by large and awful faces from beyond, and on these faces there are no smiles..."

@SwichLabs @SantiagoAuFund @SmellsBadInHere If this was directed at me, I think it’s obvious that I’m aware of the analogies. The founders anticipated the evolution of this republic. It was only when i listened to a chronological history that the similarities became so apparent.

@SantiagoAuFund @Tnv70 @SmellsBadInHere love how people mention these Rome analogies as if people haven’t been saying it for decades on end.