Tony Lee🔥

1.8K posts

Tony Lee🔥 banner
Tony Lee🔥

Tony Lee🔥

@TonyLee1997

揭發加密貨幣行業裡被用作割韭菜的垃圾項目!。 #Major、#CSPR、#AEVO、 #DEP 、 #ELON ,以上都是詐騙項目,千萬別投資買!

Katılım Eylül 2021
150 Takip Edilen56 Takipçiler
Bee Network Updates
Bee Network Updates@ATestnet9·
📢 $Bee Network listing could happen on May 20th, just as $Pi listed on Feb 20th You know why?
Bee Network Updates tweet media
English
130
126
883
22.5K
OpenMind
OpenMind@openmind_agi·
Why Generic Humanoid Robots Will Fail — And What's Next Imagine an alternate world where we never invented the car. In that world, a robotics engineer might reasonably conclude that robotic horses are the future — replace the living ones, keep the stables and saddles, ride them to work. Convenient, modern, and the roads stay free of manure. It sounds absurd only because you already know about cars. We keep making the same mistake with humanoid robots. Consider transportation. To finally make driving safe, we had two options: put a humanoid in the driver's seat, or embed sensing and compute directly into the vehicle. Waymo chose the latter. It has no steering wheel. It exists purely to move people efficiently from A to B. The humanoid was not needed. Consider a sock factory. Yes, you could replace workers with humanoid robots one-for-one on the assembly line — and gain maybe 2-3x efficiency. Or you could completely redesign the workflow around a purpose-built autonomous sewing system and eliminate most of the factory, the chairs, the cafeteria, the manual sewing machines, the HVAC, the doors, and the restrooms. The actual optimization is to side-step the previous human-imposed physical constraint. Look at Ukraine. The front lines aren't filling up with Terminator-style humanoids carrying rifles. Human soldiers are being replaced by heterogeneous swarms of purpose-specific drones: some for reconnaissance, some for logistics, some for delivering munitions. War is being restructured around the desired outcome (survival), not the soldier's shape. Consider a 1970's office. Want to move information through teams of people? We once used typists, paper, trucks to supply the paper, typewriters, and repair technicians. A linear improvement would have been to replace the human typist with a 10-fingered humanoid. What actually happened? The entire workflow — paper, printers, typewriter factories, delivery trucks, the desks, the offices — was obliterated. Email deleted the human clerk's entire universe. Consider cancer early detection by mammography. Today, getting a mammogram requires expensive hardware, logistics infrastructure, human nurses and doctors, a biopsy workflow, a human pathologist with a microscope (imported from Germany or Japan), a written finding, multiple physician reviews. Sure, you could replace the pathologist with a humanoid (the microscope focus knob requires finger dexterity) and get a modest efficiency gain (and faster responses at 2 am). Or — the far more likely future — we all swallow a cancer detection pill every few months, and 24 hours later a color-changing sticker on our arm turns red or green. No hardware. No hospital. No logistics. No pathologist. No office. No desk. No humanoid. The workflow isn't optimized by a literal drop-in swap of a human pathologist for a humanoid. The entire workflow simply ceases to exist. Consider life sciences research and drug development. We're seeing excitement about robot arms and humanoids pipetting water in research labs. Robot horses, episode 7. We don't design aircraft by crashing test planes — we simulate them entirely in software first. Biology will go the same way. The path to scalable drug discovery isn't robot arms in conventional wet labs demonstrating 10 fingered prowess in manipulating Eppendorf tubes filled with purple food coloring. Rather, we need in-silico biological models that evaluate billions of hypotheses computationally, with physical manipulation of atoms only at the very end. The clear pattern. Efficient automation doesn't try to replicate a 10-fingered human in a static context. Automation eliminates physical rate-limiting steps in their entirety. That's why "classical" humanoid robots, as a generic category, will largely fail. They're robotic horses. They assume the infrastructure and workflows stay fixed and only the 10-fingered human is swapped out. That's not how economic and technological pressure works. What actually matters? If humans continue to inhabit the physical world, then moving atoms will remain important, and that requires five things: atoms, energy, force generation and actuation, sensing, and compute. Everything else — form factor, number of limbs, type of end effector — is a variable to be optimized for the task. So if you are a pathologist, a robotics engineer, a teacher, a parent, a politician, or a sewing factory owner - please think different. Most obviously, we should all anticipate, and build for, a future in which robots exhibit extreme physical fluidity: Two arms or four. Wheels or legs. Tentacles or flippers. Three fingers or twelve, or none at all. Eyes at the front, side, or tip of a tentacle. At OpenMind, we don't care what you look like right now - we got you, in all your physical form factors. OM2 ships in July, for all machines. Let's build.
English
15
38
217
610.9K
OpenMind
OpenMind@openmind_agi·
We were delighted to participate at CONNECT 2026: Global Embodied AI Innovation Summit where we formalized our strategic partnership with @MagicLab_Robot. We also shared our thoughts in the panel: Perception, Foundation Models & Decision-Making. Excited to see continued collaboration in the space as we expand our reach across multiple robot manufacturers.
OpenMind tweet mediaOpenMind tweet media
English
18
31
300
9.8K
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
Here's my wallet info for you to send funds! Username: lzt1997@tether.me
English
0
0
0
39
Katana Perps
Katana Perps@katanaperps·
Points period 4 wrapped with record participation. Points are settled and period 5 is live! No better time to join than now.
English
3
4
21
4.9K
Katana ⚔️
Katana ⚔️@katana·
vKAT is built to steer incentives toward productive DeFi. Emissions bring liquidity. Liquidity drives activity. Activity generates fees. Fees reward aligned vKAT voters. Then the cycle compounds.
Katana ⚔️ tweet media
English
13
15
69
2.9K
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
@katana 別投資這種垃圾項目,代幣價格一直在下跌!
中文
0
0
0
15
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
@katanaperps @katana 沒用的垃圾,新幣上市就不斷下跌,已經跌破發行價了你們這群垃圾騙子!
中文
0
0
0
24
Katana Perps
Katana Perps@katanaperps·
1/ 2 Katana walkthroughs just dropped: 🔹 Advanced orders 🔹 API keys Tighter entries. Cleaner exits. Learn it. Use it 🔗👇
Katana Perps tweet media
English
14
9
42
3.4K
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
@kozo_tx 去你媽的日本雜種!你和另一個CEO全家都不會有好下場!騙了這麼多人!你們全家都會不得好死,你們兩個日本狗,你們倆的下一代都不是好東西,你們這種垃圾教育不出優秀的下一代,只能是豬狗不如的東西,跟你們一樣!操你媽的!
中文
0
0
0
84
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
比特幣在漲,山寨在跌或者橫盤!這情景似乎又在重現!一旦比特幣回調,山寨又會血流成河!
中文
0
0
0
217
日本暗号資産ビジネス協会(JCBA)
2025年12月5日(金)11:00-12:00開催 JCBA第3回ブロックチェーンゲーム部会を開催します。 テーマ:DePIN×ゲーム・エンタテインメントのいま:集客・マネタイズの解剖・次の潮流 ■ご登壇者 ・Digital Entertainment Asset (DEA)社 山田耕三様 @kozo_tx ・GALLUSYS 大塚敏之様 @GALLUSYS_Otsuka ※会員専用イベントとなります。 #DEA #SNPIT #JCBA
日本語
18
12
46
52.6K
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
@kozo_tx 還有人相信這兩個CEO的滿嘴謊言?這些人真是被騙都不值得可憐啊!
中文
0
0
0
52
KOZO Yamada|課題解決ゲーム事業|山田耕三
【DEPホルダーの皆さまへ】 DEPのOKXデリストの件でご心配をおかけしております。 各所に影響が発生しておりまして整理ができるのに今しばらく時間がかかりそうで、発信ができておらず申し訳ございません!お話できる内容に整理がついたところから各所機会いただいたところで、発信進めてまいります。 12月15日には元々構想を進めておりました今後の戦略についての大きなお話をさせていただくよう準備すすめております。その前にも 機会つくって情報共有してまいりたいと思います。
日本語
28
22
130
80.5K
Delta_Insights
Delta_Insights@Delta_insights_·
Adding some $CSPR Keep in mind that we could swipe the 0,006 low but this will give us good returns.
Delta_Insights tweet media
English
4
4
50
2K
Tony Lee🔥
Tony Lee🔥@TonyLee1997·
@kozo_tx 操你媽,你們兩個日本狗!DEP被okx下架了,你們日本狗全家不得好死!
中文
0
0
0
106