C-farm

@EzeCyp @washingtonpost But in any case. Article 1 section 4 of the Constitution gives states power over elections

@washingtonpost A move like this from Donald Trump would be about tightening control over voting access—basically tying ballots to federal citizenship lists. Supporters will call it election integrity, critics will call it a barrier dressed up as policy.

President Trump signed an executive order directs the U.S. Postal Service to send ballots only to voters who appear on a list of citizens to be compiled by the Department of Homeland Security with the assistance of the Social Security Administration. wapo.st/4dULJ48

@EzeCyp @washingtonpost You collect the lists then purge a bunch who voted against you. Then when they try to vote again….”you’re not on the list..” even if your family fought in the revolution

@HuffPost It’s so weird that he named his couch ‘Extraterrestrial’…….

The former congressman claims ― without actual evidence― the U.S. is forcing extraterrestrials to mate with humans abducted from war zones and migrant caravans. huffpost.com/entry/matt-gae…

@RobertJThomas1 @_Wraithborne_ @AAGDhillon People sometimes forget about the English part lol. When Van Buren was elected in 1837 he became the first United States born citizen elected president

It's worth mentioning that the right of the people to keep and bear arms originated in the English Bill of Rights, passed in 1689. Which means we inherited it from the English system as part of our bundle of rights as citizens in English colonies. That's why the second amendment doesn't create it. It merely restricts the Federal Government from infringing the right we had established almost a century before.

There’s literally a chair set up at SCOTUS for our presidents to sit in for oral argument. Your separation of powers nonsense is more imitation pearl-clutching hauteur.

Jeffrey Lurie: "Incredibly excited about the offensive staff that Nick has put together. I tell you, this is a real kudos to Nick to recognize what was clearly needed in terms of our overall offensive effectiveness. It's never about one coach, one scheme, one staff, or anything like that. That's not the way we operate. "We have our own proprietary metrics and ways of measuring offensive and defensive performance, and our offense was not what we were either accustomed to or expected of. And I tell you, Nick one of the really great qualities is his honesty about his own staff and how he wants the best. Great interview process, outstanding process... Sean (Mannion), incredibly impressive. That's all I'm going to say. You probably talked to people here. Work ethic, A+. Innovativeness and dynamicism, A+. "I like to think, and you never know, we will see, that we have a history of finding young gems on offense and defense — starting back with Gruden, Sean Payton, Andy Reid."

@StephaniaNYC @pjaicomo @PressSec Why does maga hate the constitution so much

@pjaicomo @PressSec not when we have federal elections being stollen and mass bailouts and unsecured measures

🚨HAPPENING TODAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE: President Trump To Crack Down On Mail-In Voting With New Executive Order dailycaller.com/2026/03/31/tru…

Just a reminder that: Disabled people vote by mail. Seniors vote by mail. Military personnel overseas vote by mail. Finally, Donald Trump votes by mail.

GOALIE FIGHT ALERT 😳 Igor Shesterkin and Jacob Markström were throwing hands 😱

@_Wraithborne_ @RobertJThomas1 @AAGDhillon That’s what I love about this case. What was it like when they wrote it compared to now. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

@Too_COLDforThis @RobertJThomas1 @AAGDhillon National guard is considered the organized militia. The people still make up the unorganized. The 2nd also doesn't permit militias. It gives a legal directive to the government not to impede the free exercise of a right.

@RobertJThomas1 @AAGDhillon Like the right to form a well regulated militia. Which now called the national guard. So like the 14th it’s outdated

@Too_COLDforThis @AAGDhillon That's not what's happening. The President didn't get rid of an amendment. He's questioning its scope. That's completely different.

He wants a dome. Host all kinds of events year round, Super Bowl, final four etc etc…🦅 #FlyEaglesFly ⬇️

@RobertJThomas1 @AAGDhillon I’m with @RobertJThomas1 , giving any president the power to erase amendments by an executive order would be a huge win. Next president probably get rid of the 2nd

Facts are hard things. I wish I was sitting in. I have long been of the opinion that the timing of the 14th amendment and its subject matter obviously limited its application to matters pertaining to the resolution of legal matter that arose as a result of the change of circumstances in the legal status of various classes of individuals. Which would make birthright citizenship a nullity. Further, as many have said before, and in several different ways, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. If birthright citizenship actually existed, some country, such as China, could send millions of pregnant women here to have their children. Then whisk them back to China. But, 18 years after they were born, each one of them would have the right to come back to vote. Imagine the chaos which would ensue if, say, a million votes, were strategically located around the country. The Republicans would never win the Presidency again and might have a hard time winning any Senate seats. That's a real threat under the current interpretation of the amendment. And that threat should make it clear that that interpretation is untenable. I'll make one further remark. If the entire 14th amendment is restricted to the circumstances existent during and just after the Civil War, then that would limit the extent of due process. Which is critical to carrying out President Trump's deportation agenda. If illegals and aliens are not due the full package of citizen's due process, it would make it a lot easier to get them out. Plus, it makes sense that they wouldn't have the full panoply of rights. Imagine an invading army crossed our border, and each invader claimed they were due due process to deport them. How long and how many resources would that take. The idea that all people on American soil have the exact same bundle of rights is, therefore, ridiculous. We have to be able to defend our borders, and prudence requires, for that job, that we limit the rights of those deserving of deportation to resist expelling them out of the country.

@ragtop25 @Newman81Street @kracze He wants a dome

@Newman81Street @kracze Yep.

Wow, Jeffrey Lurie won't commit to #Eagles remaining in South Philly. He says it's whatever is best for the fans. His top priority, he said, is having an outstanding fan experience in the exploratory phase of building a new stadium.

@Newman81Street @kracze He wants a dome so bad. Said he could host Super Bowl, final fours, etc etc. money.

@kracze You expect Lurie to give up negotiating leverage with the city? There is zero reason for him to commit to the sports complex before there is even a plan for a new stadium.

@ChipReiderson His rehab

Step away from golf? Dude, it’s over. (The luxury resort rehab is being done preemptively as a smart legal maneuver….)

@mhc_76 Every ball he it was smoked but right at someone. It’s only a matter of time

Adolis is just crushing the ball right now, hopefully that's the start of seeing the results

@steelCOYOTE_ @USATODAY Was Baron trump’s mother a full citizen when she gave birth? Not sure of the timeline. When Van Buren became president in 1837 he was the first president who was born a United States citizen

@USATODAY End this anchor baby bullshit forever!

Who is an American? That’s the fundamental question the Supreme Court will take up on April 1 when it debates President Donald Trump’s ability to sharply restrict which children born in the United States are automatically citizens. bit.ly/4uYAb6h 📸: Getty Creative

@Veneta2580 @USATODAY Not just that it’s a test to see if a executive order can wipe out the 14th amendment. Which we mean a stroke of a pen can erase all of the amendments

@USATODAY This isn’t just a legal debate. It’s a test of how far power can reach into defining who truly belongs.

@SkyNews Interesting way to give up, back down, surrender etc.. Whatever it works out for the stock market so that’s good

The U.S. will "leave Iran whether we have a deal or not" once it believes that Iran has been "put into the Stone Ages and won't be able to come up with a nuclear weapon", says Donald Trump. Iran war latest 🔗 trib.al/hQc3Iy6 🔗 Sky 501 and YouTube

@Stocktwits Way better then Thursdays

Tuesdays, amirite? 🥹