Touta@Toutapodcast
🗞️ ABSURD REALITY TODAY™
Are Tech Companies Running Crime Syndicates With Law Enforcement Right in Front of Our Faces™?
Or Is This Just Another Totally Normal Public-Private Partnership™?
Good morning from the fields that used to grow food and now grow server racks. The tacos might still be spicy in Austin, but the real heat is coming from the fusion of billionaire ambition, taxpayer subsidies, and technocratic dreams that treat entire regions like corporate playgrounds.
Question of the day:
Are giant tech corporations, like Tesla under Elon Musk, secretly operating criminal networks in places like Texas? Using ride-sharing and autonomous software to identify and target opponents, while coordinating with law enforcement and hiring criminals to silence dissent?
Like they did in Ohio, some people are asking whether Elon is doing the same thing in Texas as we speak. Tesla-run crime organization via Robotaxi-style systems or FBI-enabled silencing operations. However, in the Age of Absurdity™, the pattern of massive power concentration, public-private deals, and rapid tech rollout raises legitimate questions even if the darkest interpretations stay in the realm of allegation.
Because while people fight culture wars online, the real game is Top versus Bottom™.
Welcome to the Techno-Feudal Future™, where your tax dollars help build the infrastructure that could monitor, control, and profit from you, all while being sold as unstoppable progress. If you don’t fight it, this is what’s coming: privatized government functions, exploding utility bills, digital IDs for daily life, autonomous systems limiting your movement, and elite networks replacing democratic accountability with CEO efficiency. Ohio is the beta test. Texas is the scaling. Your backyard is the next patch.
The Ohio Blueprint: Wexner, Epstein, and the Birth of the Silicon Heartland
Investigative journalist Whitney Webb laid it out clearly in her Unlimited Hangout article and Jimmy Dore interview. Ohio didn’t accidentally become a data center powerhouse, it was deliberately engineered.
In the late 1980s, Leslie Wexner (Ohio’s richest man, L Brands/Victoria’s Secret) partnered with Jeffrey Epstein to convert farmland into New Albany, essentially “Wexnerville.” Epstein wasn’t peripheral: filings show him in key roles with the New Albany Company, managing properties, and Ghislaine Maxwell stated he “ran New Albany.” This created a de facto private government where the company handles zoning, bonds, taxes, and development with little public oversight.
The model spread statewide through the Columbus Partnership and JobsOhio, a private corporation that took control of public revenue (like liquor taxes) with minimal transparency. It funnels massive taxpayer incentives to corporations. Ohio is now a top U.S. state for data centers (many in the New Albany/Columbus zone: Amazon, Google, Intel).
The results on the ground: Residents face power bills jumping to $600–$700 a month for ordinary homes. Schools, libraries, and healthcare funding get cut to sustain the corporate welfare. Farmers receive above-market offers laced with NDAs. Local resistance is met with commissions to “dispel myths” about data centers rather than solving problems.
Webb links it to Dark Enlightenment ideology (Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel influence): swap democracy for CEO-dictators running sovereign corporate patches. Connections to JD Vance, Vivek Ramaswamy, and InnovateOhio push digital IDs, smart cities, autonomous fleets, and reduced private ownership, all under the banner of efficiency. Epstein’s ties and past corruption scandals (like FirstEnergy bribery) sail through with surprisingly little scrutiny.
This is the template: socialize costs and risks, privatize control and profits.
Texas: The Everything-Is-Bigger Expansion Pack™ + Kevin O’Leary’s 40,000-Acre Vision
The same playbook is unfolding in Texas, now with Tesla at the center of your concerns.
Tesla’s Giga Texas, a sprawling manufacturing giant taking thousands of acres, secured public incentives, tax breaks, and development support. Robotaxi and autonomous ride-sharing tech are expanding in Austin and beyond, pitched as the future of mobility. You point out what you deem Tesla is doing: allegedly operating a criminal organization using this ride-sharing/autonomous software to target potential opponents, while leveraging law enforcement and hiring criminals to silence critics.
These remain your allegations without verified public evidence to date. Tesla’s operations involve standard (if controversial) issues like regulatory battles, safety probes on autonomous systems, labor disputes, and resource use. But the broader model mirrors Ohio: public money supporting massive private tech infrastructure that concentrates data power and influence.
Add Kevin O’Leary (Mr. Wonderful) and visions of ~40,000-acre AI/data center campuses (discussed in Utah but representative of the Texas-scale boom). These are sold as creating thousands of jobs (aligning with “2k jobs in the future” style promises) while seeking heavy tax rebates, exemptions, and public infrastructure backing. Texas data centers have already drawn over $1 billion in incentives recently, with more coming as AI and hyperscalers expand. The outcome: gigawatts of power demand, water strain, farmland conversion, and rising costs shifted to residents.
The technocratic offer is clear, jobs, innovation, convenience, but critics see wealth transfer, surveillance capitalism, and reduced local control.
The New Corporate Kingdom™
Old kings taxed the peasants outright.
Modern technocrats get the peasants to fund the servers, the roads, the grid upgrades, the rezoning, then brand it “economic development” while labeling skeptics as conspiracy-minded.
The kingdom evolved.
The peasants got apps… and the bill.
The Real Question™
Left, right, or none of the above, who actually benefits when public resources, land, energy, and governance tilt heavily toward private tech empires? Who profits from the data, the autonomy, the digital IDs, and the 40,000-acre subsidized campuses? Who pays when bills rise and services shrink? And who gets dismissed for connecting the dots from Ohio’s Wexner-Epstein prototype to Texas-scale operations?
Final Thought™
The biggest absurdity isn’t the robots, the AI farms, or even the unproven darker allegations about targeting and silencing. It’s the expectation that citizens should subsidize systems of enormous scale and power with limited transparency, while being told resistance equals backwardness.
This is the future they’re rolling out if you don’t fight it: a full Technate where public-private partnerships make your wallet public and their authority nearly absolute. Whitney Webb’s reporting on Ohio gives the sourced blueprint. Texas (Tesla expansions, O’Leary-style projects, data center incentives) shows the acceleration.
Fight it locally: Scrutinize every incentive deal, land sale, and partnership. Reject NDAs and opaque subsidies. Organize around real impacts, power costs, resource strain, accountability. Demand transparency before the grid, the roads, and the rules are fully privatized.
The cloud isn’t floating above us. It’s being built on your dime, on former farmland, humming with your data, and potentially shaping your limits.
Welcome to Absurd Reality Today™, where the future feels inevitable only if enough people accept the invoice without reading the fine print.
We’ll see you next time, operator.
Stay aware. Stay difficult to program. Stay sarcastic enough to laugh while the matrix glitches.
Lock your doors, hold your copper pennies, and maybe don’t trust the synthetic burger that promises to save the planet while it owns the farm.
Catch you tomorrow from Austin.
Stay latent. Stay dangerous. Stay human in high resolution. 🍯⚡🌱😂🌍😈🐝
Tutaanza tena. We start again.
— by TOUTA 🚀🪞🌌
Austin, Texas | April 2026