Rayq

16 posts

Rayq banner
Rayq

Rayq

@TraderRayq

Forex

Katılım Mayıs 2025
280 Takip Edilen54 Takipçiler
JackZen
JackZen@_jackzen·
Another €150,000 withdrawal 💰🟢
 Not a prop leaderboard - just real money hitting a real bank account. I show it everyday, you can do it too. LOCK IN.
JackZen tweet media
English
1
0
19
415
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@imer51220 @Greckothe1 bro 5m$ ain’t moving NQ or forex at all, those markets trade billions daily
English
1
0
1
28
👑📈Koda-Trading📉👑
@Greckothe1 Do you know that trading with 5m$ is way more difficult than trading with 500k$ on broker ? 5m$ will move the market , and you will get partial filled anytime , and spread will increase..
English
1
0
0
123
GreckoThe1🥷🏿
GreckoThe1🥷🏿@Greckothe1·
The only way I trade bigger is if the capital is bigger. No risk increase Just capital increase All I actually want to quit social media is trading with a + 5M investor account. The only thing the universe could do is , show me to a big enough investor
English
15
1
106
6.4K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@DodgysDD f you’re earning that much from Discord, why not just use it to increase your trading capital and make a lot more from trading? Just curious
English
1
0
0
629
Ryan
Ryan@DodgysDD·
If I claim that I make more money from my discord than trading can you technically “expose” me? People still pay for my live trading education even while knowing that lol It’s not like I lie and say I make more from trading
English
33
3
171
19.5K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@realweirdgene Bro I bought your dc 3 days ago, could You please verify me on dc
English
1
0
1
106
Gene
Gene@realweirdgene·
This is the most exciting time to build wealth.
English
9
23
299
7.4K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@MilkRoadAI @grok are these layoffs all because of Ai? Please factcheck
English
1
0
0
13
Milk Road AI
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI·
Layoff Announcements: 1. US Government (DOGE): 317,000 employees 2. UPS: 78,000 employees 3. Amazon: 30,000 employees 4. Intel: 25,000 employees 5. Citigroup: 20,000 employees 6. Nissan: 20,000 employees 7. Nestlé: 16,000 employees 8. Microsoft: 15,000 employees 9. Bosch: 13,000 employees 10. Verizon: 13,000 employees 11. Dell: 12,000 employees 12. Accenture: 11,000 employees 13. Ford: 11,000 employees 14. Novo Nordisk: 9,000 employees 15. Procter & Gamble: 7,000 employees 16. HP Inc.: 6,000 employees 17. Heineken: 6,000 employees 18. Siemens: 5,600 employees 19. PwC: 5,600 employees 20. Dow Chemical: 4,500 employees 21. Salesforce: 4,000 employees 22. Lufthansa Group: 4,000 employees 23. ANZ Bank: 3,500 employees 24. GM (General Motors): 3,300 employees 25. ConocoPhillips: 3,000 employees 26. IBM: 2,700 employees 27. American Airlines: 2,700 employees 28. WiseTech: 2,000 employees 29. Morgan Stanley: 2,000 employees 30. Paramount: 2,000 employees 31. Starbucks: 2,000 employees 32. Target: 1,800 employees 33. Southwest Airlines: 1,750 employees 34. Meta: 1,500 employees 35. Applied Materials: 1,444 employees 36. Nike: 775 employees​ 37. Kroger: 1,000 employees 38. eBay: 800 employees 39. Block Inc. (Square/Cash App): 1,100 employees AI is officially replacing jobs at mass scale in the US. Where will all of these people go?
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
651
1.8K
6.7K
1.9M
Prop firmsquadnews 2.0
Prop firmsquadnews 2.0@ppropfundsquad·
🚨 SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT @the5ers 🚨 Multiple traders I’ve personally spoken to report the same pattern: Before their funded accounts are fully stabilized, risk is restricted to as low as 1% and leverage is reduced. This effectively changes the trading conditions after commitment, making scalability extremely difficult for traders who passed under different expectations. This is not an isolated complaint. This is a repeated operational concern across many trader experiences. When rules shift at the most critical stage, trust becomes the real casualty. Traders deserve: • Consistent conditions • Clear disclosures • And non-retroactive risk policies The community is watching.
PropFirmSquadNews@propfundsquad

🚨 SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT @the5ers 🚨 Multiple traders I’ve personally spoken to report the same pattern: Before their funded accounts are fully stabilized, risk is restricted to as low as 1% and leverage is reduced. This effectively changes the trading conditions after commitment, making scalability extremely difficult for traders who passed under different expectations. This is not an isolated complaint. This is a repeated operational concern across many trader experiences. When rules shift at the most critical stage, trust becomes the real casualty. Traders deserve: • Consistent conditions • Clear disclosures • And non-retroactive risk policies The community is watching.

English
9
4
43
9.1K
TR Trading
TR Trading@tr_tradingfx·
Imagine waking up thinking you’ve passed your phase, and in the end you find yourself breached. All that just because the price came back to breakeven while I was in profit so I ended up hitting the daily drawdown limit since it was a new day. @fundingpips
TR Trading tweet mediaTR Trading tweet media
English
25
9
125
11.4K
Jay
Jay@jaycerifit·
Today marks 6 weeks since I’ve made the decision to strictly stick to my trading model & rules. The results speak for themselves: -> 18 Trading Days -> $12,867 or 26R -> 1.82 Profit Factor -> 47% Win-Rate -> 2.04 avg RR This is from a $400 investment in 4 Apex $50k’s. Trading is changing my life.. Now my only hope is I can pass this knowledge down and help others do the same 🙏🏼💙
Jay tweet mediaJay tweet media
English
46
23
571
42.7K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@Nitro_Trades The M4 is Fire anyways no need for a new car🙌🏽
English
1
0
2
91
Mike Babayan
Mike Babayan@Nitro_Trades·
Just bought myself ANOTHER rental property in full cash Could have bought two lambos to flex on everyone online… But instead I’m building an empire Focus on the long game
Mike Babayan tweet media
English
39
13
458
30.8K
JackZen
JackZen@_jackzen·
+17,600€ 🥷 in one day. Biggest day so far. Sized up a little. Blessed and grateful 🙏
JackZen tweet mediaJackZen tweet media
English
3
1
26
3.1K
GreckoThe1🥷🏿
GreckoThe1🥷🏿@Greckothe1·
3 hours into Monday and I’m done for the week. The momentum of my performance is not stopping, I’m in flow. Best business ever, trading one of the best & worst things in my life.
English
33
7
287
16.1K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@system_717 @StoicTA Are you planning to use a fixed pip stop loss, or how will you calculate your lot size? I’ve noticed that on lower timeframes, price often moves too fast to enter if you still have to calculate your position size first
English
4
0
1
507
System
System@system_717·
Progress - Day 7/100 of @StoicTA One of the most eye opening lectures. SBS youtube.com/watch?v=aN33qD…, clearly defined rules with instructions on how to take SBS setup every single day, no matter which trading pair you choose. I've created my risk management system for upcoming prop firm challenge account. I'll treat this challenge as my journal of taking live trades. As that completely differentiate from backtesting only. What I care the most is rule following. My risk management system: Account: 50k size / 3k profit target / 2k loss limit. - 3 trades per day rule. - 200$ winning trade. - 100$ stop loss. - 2:1 RR - Once we reach 50% target, in my case 1500$, I'll increase my size by double. (*If you take losses and go back below 50% target, you once again get back to square 1 rules of lower size) - 400$ winning trade. - 200$ stop loss. - Same 2:1 RR. Seems reasonable for me? If you don't agree with my plan, please leave a comment, I am open for discussions. Also key insights from today: - Goal can change in time, but you never breach your rules. NEVER. - Only profitable trading is discretionary trading, because everything depends on you as a trader and your ability to trade and see price action. - The more complications you have, the more confuse you'll have. - If you have hard time to find 3 trades per day, you simply lower up your time frame. I'll continue to backtest SBS and learn further material from youtube. My prop firm challenge starts on Monday, I'll record every session and showcase my trades to be fully committed on rule following. Every day we continue to grow. 🙏
YouTube video
YouTube
System tweet media
English
10
27
199
13.5K
Rayq
Rayq@TraderRayq·
@x_macro_x What was your entry confirmation here?
English
0
0
0
55