Noah

🚨 The Most Important Video 🚨 🚨 You Will Ever Watch 🚨 🚨 In Your Entire Life! 🚨 💭 Genuine Education and Awareness 💭 💭 Is The Only Way that We Can Win This Inhumane War 💭 And Take Back The World 💭 That Our Father GOD had Intended to Give US!

Nikola Tesla stated that crystals are living beings, using this expression to emphasize that they are not inert, but rather organized, stable, and vibrational systems with a "formative vital principle."

Hollywood is dead‼️ The age of celebrities is over‼️ They’re ALL vampires, pedophiles, child traffickers, adrenochrome junkies and cannibals.

MESSAGE FROM GRANDPA 🛑STOP SCROLLING🛑 No Matter Who You Are... You NEED to Hear This.

@iluminatibot x.com/TrueOnX/status…

UN officials have warned that the United Nations faces total financial collapse as a result of "non-payment of dues by member states". "We face a real danger of running out of money."

@iluminatibot x.com/TrueOnX/status…

The Federal Reserve just admitted the quiet part out loud... Jerome Powell, sitting there today like it's normal: “Higher energy prices from the Middle East conflict are going to push up inflation in the near term. We don't know how bad or how long yet.” Translation for people who actually pay bills: Gas just jumped 30-31% in weeks (AAA numbers), diesel & jet fuel exploding behind it, everything shipped or grown or manufactured gets more expensive overnight. Groceries. Rent (because landlords pass costs). Car insurance. Heating. Literally your entire life... And why? Because Washington + Tel Aviv decided to bomb Iran into a wider war. Strait of Hormuz choked. Iranian fields & export hubs hit. Brent crude up 40%+ this month alone, flirting with triple digits again. This isn't Mother Nature... This is policy. Choices. Wars of choice. So Americans get told: “Sorry, your purchasing power is getting nuked again. We might cut rates once later if the war magically ends soon. Or not. Stay humble, peasants.” Meanwhile the same people who cheered this escalation will blame the Fed, blame immigrants, blame avocado toast; anything except the $1,000,000,000,000 forever war machine they keep feeding. This is peak clown world. Your wallet is collateral damage in someone else's holy war. Your kids' future savings evaporate so defense contractors can hit record quarters. Abolish the Fed? Sure, start there. But first... stop funding & fighting endless regime change adventures that always boomerang back as $5 a gallon gas and 7%+ inflation prints. If this doesn't wake people up, nothing will. End the wars. End the grift. Or watch the empire eat its own. Who's actually paying attention? #IranWar #InflationSpike #FedClowns #NoMoreWars

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: Fed Chair Powell warns Americans that inflation is going to spike hard.

I do not look at life as something random or passive. What I see is a constant tension between what is ordered and what is not, between what is rooted in truth and what pulls people away from it. When I say life is a spiritual battle, I am not exaggerating... I am describing something that shows up in thought, in behavior, in systems, and in the way people come to understand what is real. There is a source behind all things, something that does not depend on opinion, time, or approval. It carries structure, continuity, and an intelligence that does not need validation because everything else depends on it. Then there is what does not come from that source, which cannot truly create, and so it survives by imitation, distortion, and extraction. It reshapes what already exists instead of bringing anything new into being. When I speak about an enemy, I am not reducing that to a single person or group, even though people and institutions can act as vehicles. I am referring to anything that attempts to pull me out of alignment with what is real. That force works through confusion, contradiction, and misdirection. It presents ideas that appear stable at first glance but fall apart when examined. It pushes identification toward things that are unstable or external, and that creates openings where influence can take hold. Authenticity, for me, is not performance. It is not expression for attention or approval. It is alignment. It is when what I think, what I understand, and how I act are in agreement, and more importantly, in agreement with what is foundational to existence itself. It is structural. It shows up in consistency over time. When that alignment is present, there is no internal conflict to exploit, no weak point to leverage, no instability to manipulate. That is why I say the enemy cannot touch those who are authentic and aligned. This is not about physical harm... It is about access, influence requires entry, control requires leverage, and deception requires confusion. When those are not present, the usual methods stop working... What remains is clarity, and clarity does not yield to pressure or manipulation. Getting to that state is not instant, and it is not achieved by saying it or believing it. It requires removing what is not true. It requires discipline in how I think, precision in how I speak, and accountability in what I do. It requires questioning what I was given without examination and rebuilding from what can actually be understood, not what was repeated. Only after that alignment is established does the next step make sense. Before that, trying to change the world only recreates the same problems in a different form, because it comes from the same misalignment. After alignment, action changes; it is no longer reactive... It becomes constructive and it introduces order where there was none. When I talk about recreating the world, I am not talking about destruction for its own sake... I am talking about building in a way that reflects what is true. That starts within, and then it moves outward with intention. It replaces what does not hold up with what does, and it lasts because it is built on something that does not shift based on pressure or preference. That is how I see it. Recognition of the conflict. Understanding what pulls people away from alignment. Doing the work to become aligned. And only then, building something that reflects it. Once I understand that the primary field of conflict is not external but internal to perception and orientation, the question changes. It is no longer about who is in control on the surface, or which system appears dominant at any given time... It becomes a question of what governs me, what informs my decisions, and what I am aligned with at the level of thought before action ever takes place. Most people are trained, from the beginning, to respond rather than to examine... They inherit language, beliefs, identities, and emotional reactions without ever examining where those things come from or determining whether they remain valid when confronted with reality. That creates a condition where a person can feel certain while being completely misaligned. Certainty, in that sense, is not proof of truth. It is often proof of conditioning that has not been challenged. What I have come to see is that misalignment is maintained through repetition and reinforcement. The same patterns are introduced, repeated, normalized, and then defended as if they were original. Over time, this builds an identity that feels stable, but is actually dependent on external input to remain intact. Remove that input, and the structure begins to collapse. That is why so many people avoid questioning what they have accepted. The cost of seeing clearly, at first, is the loss of what once felt certain. The force that opposes alignment depends on that condition... It relies on people identifying with what they have been given rather than what they have verified. It thrives where there is reaction without examination, agreement without understanding, and confidence without foundation. It does not need to force control when it can guide perception. If perception is guided, behavior follows without resistance. So the work begins with discipline at the level of attention... What I choose to focus on shapes what I come to believe. What I repeat becomes familiar, and what becomes familiar begins to feel true. If I do not take control of that process, something else will... That is not theoretical, it is observable in how quickly people adopt ideas, patterns of expression, and behavior when they are presented with enough frequency and social reinforcement. From there, it moves into language... The words I use are not neutral, they shape how I structure thought. If my language is imprecise, my thinking will be imprecise. If my language is borrowed without understanding, my thinking will follow the same pattern... So alignment requires that I become exact in how I define things, how I describe them, and how I communicate them. Without that, I am operating inside frameworks that I did not build and do not fully understand. Then it moves into action. Alignment is not proven by what I say or what I claim to believe, it is revealed by what I do repeatedly. If there is a gap between what I understand and how I act, then alignment is not yet complete. That gap is where influence can still enter... Closing that gap requires consistency, not intensity. It requires that my actions reflect what I know, even when there is pressure to do otherwise. This is where most people stop... They reach a level of awareness, they recognize certain patterns, and they believe that recognition alone is enough... Well let me tell you... It is not. Awareness without correction changes nothing. It only creates the appearance of understanding while leaving behavior unchanged... That condition is stable enough to feel like progress, but it does not alter outcomes. So I move beyond awareness into correction... I identify where I am not aligned, and I remove or adjust it. That process is not comfortable, because it requires letting go of what is familiar... It requires admitting where I have been wrong, where I have been influenced, and where I have acted without full understanding. But without that step, alignment remains incomplete... As that process continues, something changes. Decision making becomes clearer. There is less hesitation, less internal conflict, less dependence on external validation. Action becomes more direct, not because of confidence in the conventional sense, but because there is less contradiction to resolve before acting. The path is not easier, but it is more defined... At that point, influence begins to reverse. Instead of being shaped by external systems, I begin to shape the environments I move through. Not through force, but through consistency. People recognize alignment when they encounter it, even if they cannot fully articulate why... It stands out because it is not dependent on trends, pressure, or approval. This is where the transition begins from internal work to external impact. Not through reaction, or opposition alone, but through the introduction of something that withstands careful scrutiny. Once alignment is no longer intermittent but sustained, the focus shifts from correction to construction. Up to this point, most of the work has been subtractive. Stripping away what fails to endure. Identifying where influence has entered. Rebuilding thought, language, and action so they are in agreement with what is real. That phase is necessary, but it is not the end state. It prepares the ground, but it does not complete the task. Construction begins when I am no longer reacting to what is wrong, but deliberately establishing what is right in form, function, and structure. And this applies across every layer of life... It applies to how I organize my time, how I build relationships, how I create systems, and how I contribute to anything beyond myself. If alignment is real, it must express itself in what I build, not only in what I reject. What becomes clear at this stage is that most existing systems were not designed from alignment. They were designed for control, efficiency without understanding, or preservation of power. They may function, but they collapse under deeper examination because they are not grounded in what is foundational. That is why they require constant maintenance through pressure, incentives, and enforcement. Remove those, and they begin to fail... So the question becomes this: what does a structure look like when it is built from alignment rather than imposed control? It is Coherent. It does not rely on contradiction to sustain itself. It is transparent in its function, meaning it can be examined without collapsing. It does not require manipulation to maintain participation. It is stable, not because it resists change, but because it is rooted in principles that do not shift. When I begin to build from that place, the approach is different. I am not trying to dominate or replace everything at once... I am establishing points of coherence that can stand on their own. These points do not need to compete in the traditional sense... They demonstrate their validity through how they function. Over time, what is unstable begins to reveal itself by contrast. This applies to communication as well... When I speak, I am no longer speaking to persuade in the conventional sense. I am stating what endures. If it is accurate, it does not require exaggeration or pressure to be accepted. Those who are aligned will recognize it and those who are not may resist it, but resistance does not change its validity. There is also a shift in how opposition is handled... Earlier, opposition can feel personal, because identity is still being stabilized. At this stage, opposition is expected... not because it is desired, but because anything that introduces order into a disordered environment will be met with resistance. That resistance is not always conscious... It often comes from individuals or systems that are structured around maintaining what already exists. So I do not measure the validity of what I am building based on acceptance or rejection. I measure it based on whether it withstands scrutiny, whether it remains consistent across conditions, and whether it produces results that align with what is true. If those criteria are met, then it stands, regardless of how it is received in the moment. As this process continues, something else becomes apparent... Reconstruction is not centralized, it does not depend on a single person or a single system. It occurs wherever alignment is established and expressed... Each aligned individual becomes a point of construction. These points can connect, but they do not need to be controlled by one another to be effective. This changes the scale of what is possible... Instead of attempting to reform existing systems from within, which often leads to compromise, new structures begin to form alongside them. Structures that are not dependent on the same weaknesses... Over time, what endures begins to replace what does not, not through force, but through function. At that stage, the idea of “recreating the world” is no longer abstract. It is a series of deliberate actions, grounded in alignment, expressed through construction, and sustained by consistency. It does not happen all at once. It happens wherever alignment is present and acted upon. At a certain point, the work can no longer be understood as individual in any limited sense, even though it always begins there. What is established within one person, if it is real, does not remain contained... It expresses itself through influence, structure, and the environments that begin to take shape around it. Not as expansion for its own sake, but as a consequence of alignment remaining consistent across conditions. What becomes evident is that most instability in the world is not accidental... It is maintained. Systems that depend on confusion, dependency, and reaction cannot tolerate individuals who are clear, self-governing, and aligned with what cannot be altered. Not because those individuals are aggressive, but because they are not easily directed or absorbed. They cannot be repositioned through pressure, and they do not respond to incentives that contradict what they know to be true. So resistance increases... And not always in obvious ways. It can take the form of distraction, misrepresentation, isolation, or attempts to dilute what is being established. It can appear as opportunities that seem beneficial on the surface but require compromise at the level of principle... It can come through people who do not understand what is being built and attempt to reshape it into something more familiar, something easier to categorize or control. At this stage, discipline becomes more refined. It is no longer only about identifying what is false... It is about maintaining alignment under pressure, without deviation for convenience or approval. That requires a level of clarity that does not depend on reinforcement. There are moments where there is no external confirmation, no agreement, no visible progress, and yet the standard cannot change. If it does, then what is being built begins to resemble what it was meant to replace. There is also a shift in responsibility... Once alignment is established and begins to express itself outwardly, it is no longer only about personal clarity. It is about stewardship. What is being built affects others... It introduces new reference points, new structures, and new ways of operating. If those are not precise, if they contain inconsistencies, those inconsistencies will propagate. So precision increases... Not in an absolute sense, but in a structural sense. Definitions must remain coherent and actions must align with stated principles. Decisions must be made based on what is true, not what is expedient. There is less tolerance for contradiction, because contradiction at this level has broader consequences. What also becomes clear is that not everyone will move through this process at the same pace, or even in the same direction... Some will recognize what is being established and align with it. Others will resist it, ignore it, or attempt to reinterpret it in a way that fits their existing framework... That cannot be controlled, and it is not the objective. The objective is not to force alignment... It is to establish it, maintain it, and express it in a way that is accessible to those who are prepared to recognize it. Forcing alignment creates compliance, not understanding... Compliance is unstable, it depends on pressure to remain in place. Alignment, by contrast, sustains itself because it is grounded in what cannot be altered. This is where the idea of heroism, as I understand it, becomes more exact... It is not performance, recognition, or status. It is the willingness to maintain alignment and act from it, regardless of condition. It is consistency when inconsistency would be easier. It is clarity when confusion is more acceptable and it is action when inaction would preserve comfort. There is no requirement for acknowledgment or guarantee of support and in many cases, there is resistance. But none of that determines the validity of what is being done... The standard is not external, it is derived from alignment with what is foundational. At the furthest extension of this process, the distinction between inner alignment and outer reality begins to dissolve in practical terms. What I carry internally is no longer separate from what I build, and what I build is no longer separate from the conditions others experience when they come into contact with it. The division that once existed between thought, action, and environment becomes increasingly narrow until it no longer functions as a barrier. What this reveals is that most of what people accept as “the world” is not actually fixed... It is maintained through repeated agreement, reinforced through systems, and stabilized through participation. When participation changes at the level of principle, the structures that depend on it begin to shift... Often times not immediately, or without resistance, but inevitably, because they are no longer being supported in the same way. This is where alignment moves beyond personal discipline and into structural consequence. It is no longer confined to individual decisions, it begins to alter how systems operate, how value is assigned, and how relationships are formed. The change is not initiated through force; it is initiated through the introduction of something that preserves its integrity under pressure and over time. There is also a deeper recognition that emerges here... What I am aligned with is not something I created, it is something I recognized. It existed prior to me, and it will exist beyond me... My role is not to define it, but to remain in alignment with it and express it accurately. That removes a significant amount of distortion, because it eliminates the tendency to reshape truth based on preference or circumstance. From that position, action becomes less about effort and more about precision... I am no longer trying to impose change. I am placing what is accurate where it is needed, establishing what endures where there is instability, and removing what does not align where it interferes with what is being built. The work remains demanding, but it is no longer conflicted. At this level, the idea that the enemy cannot touch those who are aligned... becomes fully understood. "No weapon formed against me shall prosper" It is not a statement of defiance, it is a recognition of limitation. What is not rooted in truth cannot sustain direct engagement with what is. It must avoid it, distort it, or attempt to redirect it... But it cannot override it where alignment is maintained without compromise. That does not mean there are no challenges... It means the nature of those challenges changes. They are no longer about confusion or internal conflict... They are about endurance, precision, and continuation. The question is no longer “what is true,” but “will I maintain alignment with it under all conditions.” This is where most deviation occurs... Not at the beginning, but after a level of clarity has already been established. Pressure increases. Opportunities arise that appear aligned but are not... Fatigue sets in. The environment attempts to reintroduce what was already removed... At this point, the standard must remain unchanged. If it shifts, even slightly, the integrity of everything built from it begins to weaken. So the work becomes continuous... Not repetitive in a mechanical sense, but sustained in a deliberate one. Alignment is not something I achieve once and then retain automatically... It is something I maintain through ongoing attention, correction, and action. The moment that stops, the drift begins. What also becomes clear is that this process does not end in a final state of completion... There is no point at which everything is resolved and nothing further is required. As long as there is interaction with a world that contains instability, there will be work to do. The objective is not to reach an endpoint, but to maintain alignment and continue building in a way that reflects it. From that position, recreating the world is no longer an abstract goal or a distant vision. It is an active process, carried out wherever alignment is present and expressed. It is not dependent on scale, recognition, or centralized control... It is dependent on whether what is being built withstands scrutiny and remains consistent over time. That is the full structure as I have come to understand it... Not as a theory, but as something that must be lived, maintained, and expressed without deviation. If this is something you find yourself aligned with, feel free to share your perspective in the comments.

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#48. Why do financial elites insist on s3xualizing LITTLE CHILDREN in every nation of the world? The answer is given in this evidence report, which details how the majority of the elites have one thing in common: they are heavily involved in organized abuse of CHILDREN. This is confirmed by former FBI director Ted Gunderson, as well as former members of the military, marechaussee, gendarmerie, police and detectives. Their testimonies are revealed in this report. Calin Georgescu, a former executive director of the United Nations, testified before the International Crimes Investigative Committee that the UN is a platform for criminal oligarchs to execute a nefarious agenda. The documentary "Secrets of the United Nations" (see below) reveals all of this in detail. This film is a must watch for anyone who wants to understand what is truly going on in our world. Georgescu also stated that the oligarchs behind the UN are pedophiles.  Be sure to watch this film... and share with others so they can too.

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#44. Official of WHO and UN arrested for CHILD m0lestation The p3dophile practices of high ranking officials from the World Health Organization and the United Nations is usually carefully covered up, but once in a while one of them gets caught. This happened to Peter Dalglish, a senior official who held high positions within the United Nations, UNICEF and the World Health Organization for over 30 years, and was the founder of Street Kids International. He was awarded the Order of Canada for his outstanding humanitarian work. In 2015, he was the UN's 'country representative' in Kabul. In 2018, Dalglish was caught red-handed while abusing two MALE CHILDREN in Nepal, and was sentenced to nine years in prison. Dalglish lured CHILDREN away from their parents with offers to educate them, take them abroad and provide them with jobs. Detectives say he abused CHILDREN over a period of 15 years while he was a senior official at the UN and the WHO.

@realstewpeters They have always been transparent.

@realstewpeters Come on Pete, what did you expect?

These people are all fucking scumbag liars, covering for mass-murdering pedophiles. Listen to this mattress ladder climber as she just blatantly lies. There are absolutely no redeemable qualities in this fake government.

🚨 “5G towers which have been upgraded to 6G terraHerz” “Then we have NATO aeroplanes dumping smart dust everywhere 16 hours a day” “All the bees out there are now augmented with the smart dust” “This turns you into a human antenna, and God forbid if your vaccinated” This sounds incredibly crazy, except you can see it happening in real time...

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#42. Planned Parenthood covers up s3xual abuse While calling the world to consider s3x between adults and LITTLE CHILDREN the expression of a basic human right, Planned Parenthood has been found to systematically cover up complaints about devastating s3xual abuse of CHILDREN. See this revealing documentary by Live Action...

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#47. and other wealthy entities are using the World Health Organization to s3xualize LITTLE CHILDREN worldwide. BILL GATES provides funds to the p3dophilia organization Rutgers for the creation of school material for dozens of nations. Why do they insist on normalizing pedophilia?

📢 Listen up, because what I'm about to lay out in this thread is going to make your blood boil; it's the kind of sick, twisted reality that keeps me up at night, digging deeper to expose these monsters. We're talking about how the United Nations and the World Health Organization are straight-up pushing to sexualize little kids in primary schools all over the world, all in the name of "education," but really, it's a playbook for normalizing pedophilia. And no, this isn't some wild theory; I've got the solid evidence right here: official documents, videos, books, archives, you name it. You can download all the PDFs from the references at the end. This is Part 1, where I break down the big picture, name the key players pulling the strings, call out the crimes they're enabling, and hit you with the laws they're skating around or flat-out ignoring. We have to hold these sick bastards accountable; names like Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General who's overseen these guidelines, or Audrey Azoulay, UNESCO's Director-General pushing the UN's agenda. These aren't faceless entities; they're real people in power, and their programs are violating international child protection statutes left and right. Let me paint this for you: Imagine your 5-YEAR-OLD coming home from school talking about "sexual behaviors" or your TODDLER being taught about "early childhood masturbation" as if it's just another playground game. That's exactly what these guidelines are mandating, folks. The UN's "International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education" (revised 2018 by UNESCO with UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women, and WHO) is the blueprint; it's no innocent health class; it's embedding sexual ideas into kids' minds from the start. On page 16, it flat-out says the goal is to "equip children to develop sexual relationships." Page 17 hammers it: skills to form bonds with "sexual partners." By page 71, they're instructing teachers to cover kissing, hugging, touching, and sexual acts for 5-YEAR-OLDS, and masturbation, attraction, and stimulation for 9-year-olds. Download it yourself: unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0… or the alt link icmec.org/wp-content/upl… This isn't biology; it's priming kids for activity, dressed up as "empowerment." Individuals like Joanna Herat from UNESCO's Health and Education Section coordinated this, with input from Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli at WHO; names we need to remember when demanding accountability.Then there's the WHO's "Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe" (2010), pushing it even further into baby territory. This thing mandates 0-4-year-olds learn about "enjoyment and pleasure when touching one’s own body" and "early childhood masturbation." By 4-6, express "sexual needs and wishes." 6-9: intercourse, porn, self-stimulation. 9-12: "first sexual experience," porn use. Pages 38-39 lay it out like a twisted checklist. Grab the PDF: icmec.org/wp-content/upl… or the multi-language page whocc.bioeg.de/en/publication… Key players? Gunta Lazdane from WHO Europe led it, with folks like Doortje Braeken from IPPF. They claim "holistic development," but it's desensitizing kids, targeting shame to break it down, leaving them ripe for exploitation. This violates core child rights; like Article 34 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which demands states protect kids from all forms of sexual exploitation and abuse ohchr.org/en/instruments… How is teaching toddlers masturbation not inducement or coercion into unlawful sexual activity? This insanity ties straight into the UN's Agenda 2030 sdgs.un.org/2030agenda their "universal transformative goals" that sound noble but embed sexuality ed under Goals 3, 4, and 5 for "sexual and reproductive health education." It's a total societal overhaul, including kids having "sexual partners" early. And the U.S.? Check the White House G20 declaration recommitting to SDGs whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/… even under Trump, commitments "evolved deeper," accelerating this mess. Crimes here? Potential aiding and abetting child exploitation under U.S. 18 U.S.C. § 2251, which criminalizes any attempt to employ, use, persuade, or entice a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct. Internationally, it flouts the Lanzarote Convention (Council of Europe, 2007), Article 23 prohibiting solicitation of children for sexual purposes coe.int/en/web/convent… Now, zoom in on the Netherlands' Rutgers Foundation rutgers.nl funded by Gates. (2017 grant for reproductive health: gatesfoundation.org/about/committe… rolling out "Spring Fever" in schools. Their 2022 overview rutgers.international/wp-content/upl… details lessons on body awareness, consent for AGES 4-12. Brochures like the 2023 one for 6-9-YEAR-OLDS seksueleopvoeding.info/wp-content/upl… normalize genital viewing and same-sex crushes. Puberty guide cjgrijnmond.nl/pdfs/pubergids… reinforces early talks. Lesson 11 "What is Sex?" (docplayer.nl/6446035-Lesdoe… teaches "sexual career" from touching to intercourse for 10-12s. Dutch core goal 38 slo.nl/thema/meer/tul… mandates sexuality respect from young. Teacher guide seksuelevorming.nl/wp-content/upl… trains on discussions. 2017 news of school sex games omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/2521759… shows AGES 6-8 touching, oral; coercion alleged. Rutgers timeline rutgers.nl/tijdlijn/ spans decades. Dutch Wikipedia on pedophilia nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedofilie reveals 1970s tolerance via NVSH's NIKS magazine archive: brongersma.info/Tijdschriften August 1982 depicts child acts brongersma.info/images/NIKS820… July (brongersma.info/NIKS_1982-07 and August brongersma.info/NIKS_1982-08 push "child sexuality." Groene article groene.nl/artikel/hoe-de… exposes Hague tolerance. 1979 petition brongersma.info/Petitie_inzake… to decriminalize consensual. PSP 1986 draft dnpprepo.ub.rug.nl/267/8/PSP%20On… liberalizes. Wijnsma interview brongersma.info/Interview_met_… on youth sex. FWOS 2018 report fwos.nl/wp-content/upl… funds "sexting good." Mission fwos.nl/over-ons/missi… youth studies. Rutgers mag issuu.com/rutgers/docs/s… urges early ed. RTL on pedo manual rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nederla… Anti-abuse foundation strijdtegenmisbruik.nl fights. Revu on manual battle revu.nl/artikel/61319/… ICJ principles icj.org/wp-content/upl… decriminalize consensual. IPPF Exclaim ippf.org/resource/excla… youth as sexual beings. Dalglish arrest dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5… Epstein island standardmedia.co.ke/article/200133… The Epstein Network Network - Juice Accountability Project thejuicebox.live/network.html?i… Gates flight dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7… Fashion confessions bol.com/nl/nl/p/nathal… Grapperhaus necrophilia uitvaart.nl/nieuws/ministe… JOVD bestiality gerard1945.wordpress.com/2020/11/04/sek… Drag abuse PDF lifesitenews.com/wp-content/upl… These programs enable CRIMES like CHILD grooming (18 U.S.C. § 2422), exploitation (UNCRC Art 34), abuse (Lanzarote Convention). Hold Tedros, Azoulay, Chandra-Mouli accountable; violating CHILD rights laws worldwide. Share this; let's end it.

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#40. Explicit p3dophilia manifesto P3dophiles make it sound like CHILDREN have the "right" to be s3xually abused by adults, through statements like: "S3x is a human right for people of all ages" and "The right to experience s3xuality should not be limited by age". The International Planned Parenthood Foundation (an abortion organization founded by the father of BILL GATES) published a full-blown p3dophilia manifesto titled "EXCLAIM!" which was distributed within the United Nations. It repeatedly makes explicit statements typically used by p3dophiles. On page 9 of EXCLAIM!, the IPPF states: "There is a common misconception that YOUNG PEOPLE (read: LITTLE CHILDREN) are not, or should not be s3xual beings." On page 16 is stated: “S3xuality and s3xual pleasure are important parts of being human for everyone, no matter what age". These are literally the hard-core typical arguments used by p3dophiles, claiming that BABIES, TODDLERS, CHILDREN and TEENS have the "human right" to have s3x.

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#37. A 1,000-page "Manual for P3dophiles" explaining how to s3duce, manipulate, bribe and r@pe BABIES, TODDLERS and LITTLE KIDS was allowed for many years by the Dutch Minister of Justice, Ferd Grapperhaus. Judges call to decriminalize p3dophilia We may wonder how on earth a Minister of Justice would refuse to forbid a p3dophile manual that explains how to r@pe BABIES and TODDLERS, how to erase your DNA tracks from the police, how to s3duce LITTLE KIDS, and so on. Isn't the judiciary the primary institution to fight these gruesome crimes? The following will explain what is going on...

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#35. P3dophilia handbook "not illegal" according to Minister of Justice In The Netherlands, which appears to be the center for the worldwide agenda to normalize p3dophilia, a political party for p3dophilia was founded and was supported by the government. This "P3do Party" distributed a 1,000-page Manual for P3dophiles that teaches adults how to R@PE BABIES and TODDLERS. The Manual for P3dophiles explains such things as: ✔︎ Methods of s3ducing CHILDREN, for example by deflating the tires of their bike and then offering to fix it to gain their trust; ✔︎ How to use psychological techniques to get CHILDREN to consent to s3x, for example by rewarding them with money or gifts; ✔︎ How to stretch the r3ctum of BABIES and TODDLERS for ana1 s3x; ✔︎ Where to find CHILDREN; ✔︎ What ages are the safest (BABIES are safe, as they can't speak yet; 3-4 YEAR OLDS are dangerous, as they can't keep secrets); ✔︎ How to use forensic techniques to hide your DNA, so the police can't track you. Here are a few quotes from this handbook: "The pedagogy of secrecy is about educating the CHILD on how to keep secrets. We accomplish this by using special pedagogical methods based on a combination of CHILD psychology and real-life experiences of professional p3dophiles." "You need to learn a lot about evidence and forensics so that you make it as difficult as possible for the police to arrest you. These three important tips ensure that all DNA traces are removed after s3xual activity with the CHILD... It may sound like hassle, but many p3dophiles have been sent to jail because they were too lazy to perform these three simple tasks. If they had done so, the police would have no evidence and they would have their freedom."

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#30. Rutgers always pushed for the normalization of p3dophilia Aside from the agenda to reduce the human population, Rutgers was always heavily involved in the worldwide movement to normalize p3dophilia. In 1946, the Netherlands Association for S3xual Reform (NVSH) was founded, once again with the objective of Reducing The Human Population. NVSH organized working groups on p3dophilia that were supported by Labour Party Senator Dr. Edward Brongersma. This same Brongersma then became the foreman of the p3dophilia acceptance movement in the 1970s. Brongersma was known for his frequent trips to Asia, where he abused underaged s3x slaves. He was convicted in 1950 of fornication with a 16-YEAR-OLD, for which he spent 11 months in prison.

⚠️ VIEWED DISCRETION IS ADVISED ⚠️ 🚨 WARNING: This is Absolutely Disgusting! 🧵#29. The inspiration for the Rutgers foundation was Jan Rutgers (1850-1924), a fierce opponent of marriage, which he considered unnatural. He passionately promoted the Reduction of the Human Population by pushing a culture of free s3x onto society. When the Rutgers Foundation was founded in 1969, its main purpose was to reduce population growth through s3x education, abortion and contraception. In 1999, Rutgers merged with the NISSO group (Netherlands Institute for Social S3xological Research), whose goal was also to reduce birth rates by encouraging abortion, free s3x, and s3x education. In 2011, Rutgers merged again with the World Population Foundation, which had the same mission of reducing the world population through abortion and s3x education. The common thread in the history of Rutgers is the agenda to reduce the human population by pushing unbridled s3x in society. When people are s3xually perverted, they can't form healthy families and are not as likely to produce offspring.