True Virginia Independent

5.2K posts

True Virginia Independent banner
True Virginia Independent

True Virginia Independent

@TrueVAIndie

20 • RW Libertarian from NoVA • Pro tax cuts, school choice, and deregulation. • Get the government out of our lives.

Northern Virginia Katılım Ağustos 2022
509 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Leroy the Elk
Leroy the Elk@LeroyTheElk·
fellow SCOTUSwatchers: what's the most beautifully written opinion you disagree with? for me, it's Kagan's dissent in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
English
3
0
2
124
True Virginia Independent
True Virginia Independent@TrueVAIndie·
@dilanesper @ProfDBernstein Ex: I don’t think the Chief agrees with Bostock in the 90s (or even when he was appointed in 2005). There’s two shifts there - one societally (broader acceptance for gay persons), but one jurisprudentially (where we now focus on the plain text rather than atextual sources).
English
1
0
2
118
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
@ProfDBernstein There isn't an overton window on the Court. The center moves because of appointments, not because Thomas made positions OK.
English
3
0
6
1.4K
True Virginia Independent retweetledi
Clarence Maximus
Clarence Maximus@ClarenceMaximus·
The idea that there are literally any legislatures anywhere in the entire country who are going “I want to racially discriminate just for sheer love of the game, but I’m gonna PRETEND it’s actually just to benefit my party” is so absurd I don’t even know how to address it.
The Fifth Column 🖐@wethefifth

David French explains SCOTUS's 6–3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais. Our new episode with @davidafrench is out now.

English
22
59
851
57.6K
True Virginia Independent
True Virginia Independent@TrueVAIndie·
@tralaleroc @Vibutler_ They give comprehensive reasoning when the case comes on the merits docket, as they did in this exact case, but doing so earlier can create a lock-in effect
English
0
0
0
64
Tralalero Capuchino
Tralalero Capuchino@tralaleroc·
@TrueVAIndie @Vibutler_ I don't see how those examples do anything to help anyone's case. I'm not objecting to a court providing an injunction or granting a stay; I am objecting to them doing so without an explicit reasoning.
English
1
0
0
59
Tralalero Capuchino
Tralalero Capuchino@tralaleroc·
@Vibutler_ I'd ask why not? The court is disturbing (and I use this term here non-pejoratively) what would be the normal state of affairs (a policy that is presumably legal) by not allowing it to take effect, so I think it's not unreasonable to ask that it explains why it's taking that step
English
2
0
1
83
Lord Voldemalort
Lord Voldemalort@dom_dont_tweet·
I'm going to be the first court watcher to mute "Justice Jackson" at this rate you people are fucking unserious
English
1
0
4
108
Lord Voldemalort
Lord Voldemalort@dom_dont_tweet·
9 KAGAN COURT NOW (Will accept 9 Breyers)
Maddog301@maddog301

@QuinHillyer Yes, when he gets locked on to a bad idea (foreign relations here) he's really bad. It's why I wouldn't want a Court of 9 Thomases. If I had to choose, perhaps 9 ACBs. I can only assume this is how the left feels about Bruener, except he wasn't (very) wrong there.

English
5
0
4
343
True Virginia Independent
True Virginia Independent@TrueVAIndie·
@scotus_wire Pretty confident Gorsuch will get Chiles, and would be surprised if Roberts didn’t take Callais (if it’s not Roberts, it’s Alito). Someone obviously will have 2 cases from October.
English
0
0
1
1.7K
SCOTUS Wire
SCOTUS Wire@scotus_wire·
Here's some SCOTUS math: after today's rulings, 4 cases remain from the October sitting, two of which are major ones (conversion therapy and VRA/race-based redistricting). Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch are the only justices who have yet to author an opinion from this sitting...
English
26
95
840
220.2K