MB

@SteveBakerUSA @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports Demonstrably not if youre still saying you'll get around to it when you get around to it. Im not saying youre grifting, but it sure is the grifter playbook.

@TrustIsEarnd @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports 🙄 We’ve been “around to it” for years.

The truth of what lies behind doors #1 and #2 of these Falls Church, VA condos is either a coincidence of astronomical improbability, or proof that @FBI began their coverup of the J6 pipe bomber as early as January 13, 2021. @HanneReports and I are now free to tell the entire story. Rollout begins tomorrow. Please follow both of us here on X. Thanks to @elonmusk, you won’t miss any of it. Happy Easter 🙏✝️

@vladlobachevsk2 I did, and Grok replied: "more than double levels from about a decade ago" which is not the last 4 years.

@TrustIsEarnd You didn’t read what I posted above. The details you asked for are there.

How bad is the fraud in California? Their Medi-Cal (Medicaid) program budget has more than doubled by $114 BILLION while enrollment has only gone up by 0.72% over 4 years. Prime example of fraud, waste, and abuse of taxpayers dollars. END THE FRAUD.

MB has a point. When a journalist responds with “We will tell everything in OUR time…,” it doesn’t produce confidence in your audience. It’s one thing to say, “We’re still investigating, talking to sources, and analyzing the data, so it would be premature to come out right now with more facts.” But your response wasn’t that. You just as easily may be implying you intend to feed the public teaser after teaser, in an age-old game of click bait. The fact remains you accused Kerkhoff of committing a crime and current FBI administrators of covering it up by indicting a patsy. Journalist standards require that you show your work now. Right now the public record may contain enough evidence to raise reasonable doubt about Brian Cole’s guilt. But it’s far short of establishing proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of Kerkhoff and unnamed persons in the FBI or DOJ engaged in a coverup. I understand it’s not a journalist’s job to make that case. But it is a journalist’s job to back up, with hard facts, serious allegations of official wrongdoing. Promises to tell all some time down the line sends the wrong message.

@SteveBakerUSA @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports Yeah well, when you get around to it we can evaluate if you have anything.

@TrustIsEarnd @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports Just hold your horses. We were muzzled for five months. During that time we were allowed to reveal an immense amount of detail about the Brian Cole case. We’re just getting started on the Kerkhoff story. We will tell everything in OUR time, and in OUR order.

The current estimated cost to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles by high-speed rail is $126 billion, says Anthony Williams, a California High-Speed Rail Authority board member. Can the project succeed without federal funding? cbsn.ws/4sOE4sV

@OldJames002 @Handre And where are these alleged vaults? Banks would be losing money every dollar they leave idle.

@Handre No. Your bank just puts it in a vault and keeps it when conditions of recession exist. It does not lend the dollar saved out to anyone because the risk is too high and the opportunity cost of not waiting too great. That’s why Keynes was right and proved so again in 2008 and 2020.

Picture John Maynard Keynes in 1936, furiously scribbling his *General Theory* while Britain's unemployment sits at a brutal 13%. The man's convinced he's cracked the code: savings don't automatically become investment, therefore government must step in to bridge the gap. Pure economic genius, right? Wrong. Keynes fundamentally misunderstood how real economies work. When you save a dollar and stick it in the bank, that bank doesn't just lock it in a vault. Your bank immediately lends that dollar to someone else—maybe a entrepreneur buying equipment, maybe a family buying a house. The interest rate acts as the price mechanism that matches savers with borrowers. No government bureaucrat required. (At least this is what it used to work like back in the 1930's. Now, banks don't even need your money to lend out, they can just lend out as much as they want.) But Keynes looked at the 1930s depression and saw idle savings sitting alongside idle workers. His mistake? He blamed the market mechanism instead of recognizing that government interventions—currency manipulation, trade wars, regulatory uncertainty—had gummed up the works. The Federal Reserve had inflated the 1920s bubble, then deflated it catastrophically. Politicians had erected trade barriers that strangled international commerce. Fast-forward to today and you see the same playbook. Powell prints trillions while Yellen lectures us about "investment gaps" that require massive government spending. They're still peddling Keynes's fundamental error: that free markets can't coordinate saving and investment, so wise technocrats must do it for us. Meanwhile, your savings account pays 0.1% while inflation runs at 6% because these geniuses keep "fixing" problems they created.

@SteveBakerUSA @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports Youve been telling bits. Youve been telling us over and over youre ABOUT to tell us all this stuff. Why dont you tell us the important bits- how did Kerkhoff get on your radar? Did Gait analysis produce her name or did you have her name and apply analysis? Whos the expert?

@TrustIsEarnd @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports “Pretty ducking weird” that you don’t know how long and often we HAVE BEEN telling this story.

@SteveBakerUSA @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports Seems like you found a penny and cant believe the odds of finding a penny with that exact serial number. Everything that followed was significant because you drilled in on it. Otherwise, why not tell your methodology in this affair. Pretty ducking weird not telling us your story

@TrustIsEarnd @KingMakerFT @FBI @HanneReports The math is easy. (For most of us.)

@EAG_0320 @lsferguson @podgorski_gary @dojphofficial I refuse to answer that question on the grounds you should know basic civics before engaging in this conversation.

@TrustIsEarnd @lsferguson @podgorski_gary She has a Presidential pardon… Why is she not released? @dojphofficial

Rumor has it the Todd Blanche is holding the process up. Blanche should have been fired along with Bondi

@yanikmtandere @ProfMJCleveland @CynicalPublius Good call

@TrustIsEarnd @ProfMJCleveland @CynicalPublius Wouldn’t be the first time.

Amidst all of the high fives over the stunning success of the pilot rescue operation, somewhere in MacDill AFB in CENTCOM HQ there is an Army or Air Force major whose job it was to do the terrain and soil analysis for the ad hoc airfield to ensure aircraft would not get stuck in mud. I'm guessing he feels like that Signals major in "A Bridge Too Far" who put the wrong crystals in the radios. Poor guy.

@tracybeanz @end3of6days9 Yeah, weird and off putting.

@end3of6days9 Why do these women always talk to us while doing their skin care and makeup routine? Why can’t I just see the story without the routine??? It’s so weird. Like, ok - you take care of your face. Great. I want to focus on this story.

Here’s the story that led up to police entering this new mom's maternity room… just THREE days after giving birth, and a NICU doctor reporting her to DCF for medical neglect. Her baby had bloodwork done for jaundice. Later that day the NICU doctor told her they were releasing her but wanted to keep the baby for light therapy. She asked for the records so she could get her pediatrician’s opinion. The NICU doctor pushed hard, insisting that without the light therapy her son would suffer brain injury. Her pediatrician reviewed the labs (bilirubin at 13 — normally no light therapy needed at that age and level) and signed the release for the baby to be released into her care, which also took the hospital off the hook for liability. My heart was racing the whole time — no new mom should ever feel this kind of pressure. Part 2 is intense… she describes exactly what happened when the police showed up 👀

@DiPietroM @ProfMJCleveland @CynicalPublius I dont think theres any doubt this was a likely outcome and losing the aircraft was considered acceptable to accomplish the mission.

@ProfMJCleveland @CynicalPublius Also quite possible that this potential issue was planned for. And the plan was to destroy it all if it this occurred Sure seems this would have been thought of Could be wrong but it’s a pretty obvious possible scenario

@ProfMJCleveland @CynicalPublius Getting the little birds and equipment there was the priority. Making it a one way trip for gear was acceptable.

@CynicalPublius Or could it be he said the terrain likely wouldn't support an aircraft but higher ups decided to proceed anyway???

@ArmchairAdml @RealestMercury Not hard to determine which warship....

@HansMahncke Another great example- Admiral Leahy (Trumans chief of staff) argued hard that the atomic bomb wasnt going to work, based on his experience with naval ordinance.

The story behind the New York Times’ 1903 claim that human flight was between one and ten million years away is even worse than it looks. Once you understand the backstory, you realize that the New York Times story is not really about flight at all but about how elites and credentialed “experts” mistake their own failures for the boundaries of possibility. The New York Times did not dismiss the possibility of powered flight at random. There was a very specific reason behind it. At the time, America’s most prominent scientific authority, Smithsonian Secretary Samuel Langley, had been showered with large amounts of taxpayer funding to build an aircraft, the Langley Aerodrome. Despite all the money, institutional backing, and elite prestige, Langley and his team could not get it to fly, culminating in a series of very public failures, the last on December 8, 1903. So when the New York Times declared that flight was millions of years away, what it was really saying was that if the most credentialed and well-funded “experts” cannot do it, then it cannot be done. A mere nine days later, the elites’ proclamation of impossibility lay in ruins. Two totally unknown bicycle mechanics from Ohio achieved the first powered flight using improvised parts, a few hundred dollars of their own money, and sheer persistence. The story of flight is, at its core, a story of the triumph of American individualism over elite credentialism. The fact that it was the New York Times that inadvertently delivered the proof is the most fitting conclusion imaginable.

@M1R19I14 @pati_marins64 Yet all that debris landed side by side in clumps, and a pair of underpants wasnt even singed. Youre increasingly sounding like a moron.

@TrustIsEarnd @pati_marins64 Nothing remains of a person in that heat and explosion. There might have been remains of 15 bodies out of 150, and someone did indeed clean them up—I don’t know which side.

So far, I have been working with the hypothesis of a pilot rescue operation. However, given the number of aircraft involved and the location, I am considering that this may have been more than just that. Two fixed-wing aircraft and four helicopters may have been shot down. How many were actually able to turn back and return safely? We could be looking at a failed attempt to establish a forward basing inside Iran. Although this version still lacks solid evidence, I will wait to address it further if more indications emerge.

@kimmie_c_ @OrdnancePackard They were stupid before you showed them new evidence, they are stupid after.

I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers.

@M1R19I14 @pati_marins64 So weird if those c130s were shot down, landed next to each other... but there are no bodies. Maybe the corpses teleported.

@TrustIsEarnd @pati_marins64 Yes, by teleporter