TruthSearch

Barbara Walters once wrote that many Americans have forgotten — and many others were never taught — how Jane Fonda’s actions during the Vietnam War were viewed by countless POWs and veterans. One of the most widely repeated accounts comes from Air Force pilot Jerry Driscoll, a POW held in the “Hanoi Hilton.” According to the story, he was cleaned up and forced to appear before Jane Fonda during her visit to North Vietnam. When ordered to praise his captors’ “humane treatment,” he instead spat at her. He was reportedly beaten severely afterward, suffering injuries that permanently affected his vision and ended his flying career. Another former POW, Colonel Larry Carrigan, described how prisoners secretly passed Jane Fonda slips of paper containing their Social Security numbers in hopes of proving to the world they were alive. The story claims she later handed those papers over to North Vietnamese officers, resulting in brutal beatings for the men involved. Carrigan survived. Others allegedly did not. Former civilian adviser Michael Benge, who was imprisoned for more than five years, also spoke publicly about his experience. He said he agreed to meet with Fonda because he wanted to tell her the truth about the treatment POWs endured — not the “humane and lenient” image being presented for propaganda purposes. According to Benge, he was severely punished before any meeting could happen. For many veterans and military families, Jane Fonda’s 1972 trip to Hanoi became a symbol of betrayal during a painful chapter in American history. While supporters viewed her as an antiwar activist protesting U.S. policy, critics believed her actions crossed the line into giving aid and comfort to America’s enemy during wartime. Decades later, the anger and controversy surrounding “Hanoi Jane” still remain powerful for many who served, suffered, or lost loved ones during the Vietnam War. Whatever one’s political views may be, the experiences of POWs and veterans deserve to be remembered and treated with respect.

Peter being married does not refute Catholicism. The Catholic Church has never taught priests must be unmarried by divine law. Clerical celibacy in the Latin Church is a discipline, not a doctrine, and even today many Catholic priests in Eastern Churches are married. The New Testament itself praises celibacy for ministry (1 Cor. 7), while also permitting marriage. Peter having a wife no more disproves the priesthood than Paul being celibate disproves marriage. And the claim that the Church invented priesthood ignores the New Testament’s ordained ministry of bishops, presbyters, and deacons, along with sacrificial Eucharistic language and apostolic succession from the earliest Christians.

I left the Roman Catholic “Church” because I got saved by the power of the true biblical gospel! I critique & expose Catholic false doctrines because I want to see others come to a saving knowledge and faith in Christ! Rome never saved anyone!

For the Protestants who deny Catholics canonized the Bible I filled out some of the names for the Catholics side Protestants…..Your Turn! 😂💧

In the Bible, we are told to confess our sins one to another. It’s easy to tell a priest you sinned against someone. True repentance is much harder, and much more profitable—go directly to the person you sinned against and confess your sin against them. That’s Biblical.

If you... - Pray to Mary - Sing to Mary - Bow down to Mary statues - Believe Mary is sinless You are a Maryan, not a Christian.