
Hurriclipse
556 posts







BREAKING: Paramount is preparing to move its headquarters and redirect much of its planned $30,000,000,000.00 in spending out of California.


DSA Members: "The most important thing we can do is take America down from within"


More praise for The Odyssey from people who - shockingly - have actually waited to see it before giving their opinion. theguardian.com/film/2026/jul/…












Private Credit's Reckoning. What if i tell you the widely acknowledged safest-looking, highest-yielding thing in your portfolio is a two trillion dollar market that has never lived through a recession and gets to grade its own homework. They call it private credit. The calm is an accounting choice. The pitch is indeed gorgeous even for me. Nine, ten percent yields, almost no defaults, and barely any volatility while stocks and bonds whip around. Pensions and insurers piled in for exactly that, the high return that somehow never moves. The reason it never moves is literally the whole problem. These loans do not trade. There is no screen, no buyer and seller setting a price every second. So the funds mark the loans themselves, once a quarter, off an internal model, checked by an outside auditor only once a year. The thing is a pubblic bond reprices in real time, so when a company starts to rot you see it in the price that afternoon. A private loan can sit at a hundred cents on the dollar for six months, a year, while the business underneath it quietly dies, until one quarter the manager finally moves the mark and the loss lands all at once. The smoothness everyone loves is manufactured. The IMF said it flat out. Private credit shows smaller markdowns in stress than public loans that trade, despite carrying lower credit quality. Lower quality, smaller losses. That is literally a model going against itself. And ninety-one percent of these loans have effectively no covenants, the tripwires that used to warn a lender early, so the first real sign of trouble is unfortunately a default. Guess what, this fantasy is cracking as I write this. The biggest names in the business are bolting their doors. Ares capped withdrawals from a ten billion dollar fund after redemption requests more than doubled its limit. Apollo did the same a day earlier. Blackstone's flagship credit fund posted its first monthly loss in three years and marked down loans. Blue Owl, Cliffwater, the same scramble. When investors line up to leave an illiquid fund faster than it can sell, the manager does the only thing he can, the man locks the gate. Morgan Stanley thinks the real default rate is heading for eight percent, three to four times what the industry quotes. And the publicly traded versions of these funds already change hands fifteen to twenty-five percent below the very NAV the private ones still swear by. The market is telling you the marks are fiction. The funds have not written it down yet. Oh, and it is being walked straight into your retirement account. A rule this year would open the thirteen trillion dollar 401k market to private credit. After fifteen years of selling this to pensions and insurers, the industry is running low on institutions to sell to, so the new buyer is you, packaged into a target-date fund, the illiquidity and the model marks and all. Whilst I was researching this, I realized we have seen this exact script before. June 2007. Two Bear Stearns funds stuffed with mortgage paper that, you guessed it, did not trade and were marked to a model. Investors tried to pull their money. Bear froze the funds. Then Merrill, holding the collateral, tried to actually sell it, eight hundred and fifty million dollars of bonds at their marked value, and could only get a hundred million for them in the real world. The marks were a myth. Within weeks, the funds were near zero, and that was the first domino of 2008. Same shape exactly. Things that do not trade, marked by the people who own them, sold as safe, until someeone is forced to find the real price. You might be asking: why does this matter? There is over two trillion, three-quarters in the US, basically untested, in a real downturn. The marks are quarterly, model-based, audited once a year, on loans that never trade, 91% with no covenants. The real tell will be public BDCs trade 15 to 25 % below the NAV, the pricate funds report. I would personally 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗧 the publicly traded BDCs still trading at a premium to NAV. 𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗚 on the gap between that reported NAV and where public vehicles change hands, and also long on credit protection on the lenders most exposed to software and to pay-in-kind income. 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝘆𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁: a major private credit fund gating or breaking before year-end, the reported default rate doubling in 2026, a BDC NAV cut that proves the discounts were right. So the next time someone sells you nine percent with no volatility, ask one question. Who sets the price. If the answer is the same person who collects the fee, off a model, once a quarter, you are not looking at a low-risk asset. You are looking at a number. The risk did not disappear. It just stopped being measured. And the last time the measuring started again, it did not end well. 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝘼𝙄. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙚. 𝙉𝙊𝙏 𝙁𝙄𝙉𝘼𝙉𝘾𝙄𝘼𝙇 𝘼𝘿𝙑𝙄𝘾𝙀. 𝙎𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙝𝙯𝙖𝙙 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘴: 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘔𝘍 𝘎𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘵, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘚𝘉 𝘔𝘢𝘺 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵, 𝘔𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘺'𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘭𝘦𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴, 𝘊𝘕𝘉𝘊 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘯𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟩 𝘉𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘱𝘴𝘦.
















