Bob Hopkins

2.1K posts

Bob Hopkins banner
Bob Hopkins

Bob Hopkins

@Unit_00

Penn Hills Pittsburgh Katılım Mart 2010
641 Takip Edilen39 Takipçiler
Bob Hopkins
Bob Hopkins@Unit_00·
@nikicaga With blue you can just make up a guy who gives you that power and then vanishes
English
0
0
0
3
Dave Cognetta デス
I have theory that it's actually impossible to win a tournament by raw skill only. There's a point in you run where you either got luck/didn't get unlucky or you just avoided the bad match-ups
English
27
11
410
41.2K
Steven Lubka ☀️
Steven Lubka ☀️@DzambhalaHODL·
If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button live. 10% of people misread the question. 10% of people are colorblind or children and just hit buttons randomly.
English
30
1
15
7.3K
cas~tel
cas~tel@rudie_cantfail·
@Unit_00 @MarxistRealism You're not voting to sacrifice your life, you're voting whether or not everyone who isn't you should be murdered.
English
1
0
0
7
MarxistRealism
MarxistRealism@MarxistRealism·
The only thing worth paying attention to in this obnoxious red vs. blue thought experiment is that the world is about to enter a period of genuine scarcity and you should be wary of the types who are willing to rationalize killing half of everyone they know for their own benefit.
English
67
831
8.8K
82.9K
SupergeekMike (Mike Christensen)
This discourse really demonstrates how you handle hypothetical situations: Do you extrapolate all the logical consequences of the original prompt (“everyone on earth” means babies and old people and less rational folks)? Or do you haggle (“everyone” means only informed adults)?
English
31
6
235
5.2K
MOH
MOH@Master0fHyrule·
Push the red button, you live Push the blue button, you get $1 Million Dollars but 100 random people die. What's your choice?
MOH tweet media
English
13
0
13
1.4K
Bob Hopkins
Bob Hopkins@Unit_00·
@FolkerHJD That's just life, I've lost a lot of people in my life already, the world keeps turning so you have to keep moving.
English
1
0
0
5
Name cannot be blank?!
@Unit_00 That's cold and pretty uncaring. I wonder if the people you care about would do more than shrug at your passing before meeting new important people
English
1
0
0
8
♿︎|Asriel // Azi|Θ∆|🍉|On 🦋!
I appreciate Arin's point. But I do find it concerning how little anyone considers the ethics of "blue button = save everyone or die trying, but red = sacrifice others for your own life". Like, only one of those options are objectively, ethically "correct", regardless of logic.
Arin Hanson@egoraptor

I understand you are reframing this to say “this is effectively the same as the button scenario, so red is the correct answer to the original scenario” but you will find the reframing has changed the votes dramatically. It is obviously not the same. The whole point of the button scenario is that pushing a button is 1. an action that every participant must do, and 2. a trivially easy action. Additionally, the status quo (what is effectively a normal day) is not altered until the results are in. The act of pushing red can then be easily internalized as actively killing someone, similar to the trolley problem. In that problem, many people would choose not to act and allow three people to be killed than bear the responsibility of killing a single person actively. When you are pushing red, you are an active participant in potential human death, much like pulling the lever to change the tracks in the trolley problem. In your train scenario, however, you’ve framed the red button as specifically NOT acting, and the blue button as an act that requires a tremendous amount of physical effort and mental load. The framing of a train coming eliminates any responsibility pushing the red button may have psychologically. It is also, on the face of it, very difficult to picture not seeing other people on the tracks. It’s important to the button problem that you are completely isolated from anyone else, and that is very easy to picture. In the train problem it is difficult to picture being completely alone, and very easy to imagine seeing only a few people tied to the tracks, looking at other people who are “deciding” and trading glances with them like “I’m not going, are you?” It then very easily becomes an obvious choice and you can retroactively convince yourself, oh, these idiots CHOSE to die. Sure, if you’re a robot, it is logically the same outcome. But we are not robots, we are humans, and we have feelings and empathy and are messy and that is what makes us worth saving. I very often see the argument that “if everyone was logical, they would just choose red. There is no problem until people choose blue.” But that is the thing, we are not logical. We are empathetic. We can imagine someone pressing blue and we can feel bad about that and feel that we don’t want them to die because of it. There IS a problem before anyone presses anything. EVERYONE is being forced to press a button. THAT is a problem. It is my personal belief that anyone using the “logical” argument for pressing red is simply scared of dying, and is using logic as an out to absolve themselves of the responsibility of being an active participant in the deaths of other humans. I am more certain of this after seeing your reframing of the problem, because as an obvious red pusher, you have positioned yourself completely outside the system. This is a problem that is happening over there, out of your control. Of course you won’t participate, it has nothing to do with you. There’s a big scary train, and you’re somewhere else, already safe. You are not a red pusher in your scenario, you are just some guy observing a bunch of people maybe killing themselves. That is the difference. And I want to be clear, that is fine. That is very human. That is the whole point of this problem. It is very human to not want to die. It is very human to want to save others. And it is also very human to justify a choice to save yourself when other people’s lives are on the line. There is no right answer. But if I can say something… I find it a little disturbing that after two extremely viral instances of this problem being posed and both of them resulting in blue winning… people are still arguing for red. Everyone is still alive. Twice. We did it. It’s over. No one needs to be convinced of anything anymore.

English
2
1
9
549
Bob Hopkins
Bob Hopkins@Unit_00·
@FolkerHJD Even if some people I care about pass if I'm alive I will have the ability to meet new important people to me.
English
1
0
0
7
Name cannot be blank?!
@Unit_00 Because I sincerely hope your life isn't just about you? Sounds terribly lonely at best, rather pathetic at worst.
English
1
0
0
10
Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA
This is actually a test of basic empathy and intelligence. Most people in the world are too dumb or uninformed to understand probability or percentages. You are also including babies, toddlers, children and people with autism, learning disabilities, dementia and brain damage...
MrBeast@MrBeast

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

English
342
23
415
66.9K
Seele :D
Seele :D@phyo_oscar·
@Unit_00 @SUPAH_SUPAH Basically means you will have to live with the same selfish and inconsiderate people if red wins
English
2
0
0
8
Seele :D
Seele :D@phyo_oscar·
@Unit_00 @SUPAH_SUPAH Or if there is more selfish people like you exist in this world, more than half will die
English
1
0
0
17
mediocre comedic phenom
You are a bad person if you press red. There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. If you press red, you are condemning infants, toddlers, children/disabled people/ elderly people/etc. who didn’t read or comprehend it, to death. You think you’ve “aha’d” all the blue pressers, but ultimately you are selfish, just like your choice of the red button
MrBeast@MrBeast

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

English
361
10
323
26.9K
The Posting Menace 🍯💗🦇
@Hockey_Is_All You do realize if red wins 4 billion people die, and it's the apocalypse right? there's no way red wins 100% of the vote, it is much more likely that Blue wins 51% of the vote. "take a small risk of dying to prevent the apocalypse" is what voting blue does
English
1
0
0
61
Bob Hopkins
Bob Hopkins@Unit_00·
@0xPBIT In any question where one option guarantees I don't die I'm taking that option
English
0
0
0
7
pbit
pbit@0xPBIT·
You live in a world of fully rational people who all make the correct decision. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button do they press?
English
210
9
97
86.3K