UpRevBreak
8.2K posts


🚨 URGENT STACKING ALERT
@Macrolite just bought another 404 Litecoin at $52 (~€44.60).
Today’s deployment: €18,004.87
New stack: 5,804+ LTC 🔥
We are not trading.
We are accumulating digital silver.

English

I sold.
Held 8years - 5400 LTC - Top 1% private holder for Long time.
Bye bye shitcoin.
Enjoy watching it to go to 0 !

MacroLite Ⓜ️@MacroLite
If You See a -10$ Litecoin candle today. It was probably me. Im Sorry in advance. I quit @ 50$.
English

Many altcoins are up 10%+ this week
Quite a few altcoins are up 25%+ this week
A few random ones are up 100%+ this week
People are still arguing with me that altcoins aren't pumping.
Has nobody looked at a chart all week?
Nebraskangooner@Nebraskangooner
Altseason. 🤝
English

🚨 Charlie Lee just dropped a brutal truth bomb: 😱😱😱
“Don’t buy $LTC… just stack #Bitcoin and forget everything else.”
The creator of Litecoin now says he regrets building it and is telling investors to ditch alts and go all-in on Bitcoin.
If even the founder is waving the white flag… what does that say about the rest of the market?


English

@vinibarbosabr @loshan1212 Tell me you don’t understand without telling me you don’t understand.
English

you just described a double spend event here while denying it has happened
this is the definition of double spends:
> "Certain small pools were running old non-consensus rule following nodes, which accepted the invalid tx. And slowly mined blocks, during which point, the attacker deposited to NEAR and swapped chains.
When the crashed mining nodes came back online, they reorged as the blocks mined by the smaller nodes didn't follow consensus rules, and thus the attacker's tx was made invalid."
English

NEAR Intents lost $600k due to LTC double spends following the 13-block reorg that affected the chain today in a coordinated attack against miner nodes
This is a problem inherent to most pure PoW chains, as they have probabilistic and not deterministic finality
meaning the transactions are not really final as a competing chain with more hashrate can surge and invalidate all the blocks from the lower-hashrate chain
participants confirming transactions based on this now invalidated chain will end up with nothing, seeing their double-spent balance vanishing
pure PoW is insecure by default
PoS and hybrid chains have already developed better architectures and i have no idea why people still accept this old standard for these smaller chains
I don't think I can trust accepting LTC transactions anymore (not that I had many people wanting to use it in my network anyway)
I feel sorry for NEAR Intents team having to absorb this loss without Litecoin community's support (most comments I have seen responding to @AlexAuroraDev are fairly hostile)
i would expect more empathy to services with ltc implemented that were affected by a known vulnerability in their chain's architecture
Alex Shevchenko 🇺🇦@AlexAuroraDev
NEAR Intents users will not be affected. Any losses will be covered. The exposure for NEAR Intents is around $600k. We recommend all trading venues for LTC to audit the transactions and holdings. We see a lot of double spend transactions.
English

This is why I no longer speak at Bitcoin conferences.
These conferences are created and sponsored by those who want to centralize as much Bitcoin as possible into financial-industrial complex wrappers.
You resist by holding it in self-custody and boycotting all FIC wrappers, including conferences owned by Bitcoin treasury companies.
Heidi@blockchainchick
Are these the people you want "shaping Bitcoin's future"? The FBI Director. The Acting AG. The SEC Chair. The CFTC Chair. Bitcoin was literally invented to route around these people. Now they're the keynote speakers.
English














