James Bond

🚨RED STATE ALERT: PAY ATTENTION, UTAH AND TEXAS! The same Radical Imam Who’s Conquering a Church in Texas Was the Star Guest at the Kuwaiti Mosque’s Massive Islamic Library in Utah Same actors. Same mission. Different conservative states. Remember the Kuwait government-owned Islamic Center of Kuwait in Utah 0 the one with the giant sign bragging it was “opened at the expense of the STATE OF KUWAIT”? Inside that foreign-funded outpost, they built one of the largest Islamic libraries in the region. Not just books… an ideological hub. And who flew in as the special guest for the grand opening of that library? Sheikh Abu Yusuf Uthman bin Farooq al-Yusufzai - the Pakistan-born, sharia-adherent dawah preacher (banned in the UK and Canada) who is now leading the hostile takeover of a Baptist church in Texas. While he was in Utah smiling for the cameras at the Kuwaiti mosque library opening, he and Sheikh Karim AbuZaid were already fundraising across the country for their Texas dawah empire. They’re not hiding it: “Islam will enter every house.” “Their children will be Muslim.” “If you convince the public… they’ll chant ‘Long live Sharia!’” Now they’re suing to force the $3.8 million handover of a 40,000 sq ft Korean World Mission Baptist Church in Dallas to turn it into: A mega mosque An “Islamized” K–12 school The AIM Dawah Seminary is run by these same extremists This is coordinated. Foreign governments plant outposts in Utah. Radical imams use those platforms, then move on to conquer churches in Texas. Red states are the target because they’re family-oriented and conservative. They preach Islamic supremacy under the guise of “religious education” while demanding we hand over our churches. And we’re still pretending this is just “diversity.” Texas is the frontline. Utah already has the Kuwaiti flag flying. Wake up before more churches fall and more ideological libraries pop up in your backyard. Full Texas exposé can be read here: rairfoundation.com/texas-church-c… This isn’t a coincidence. This is conquest by invitation. Share this before they shut it down. America is being Islamized from within. See the Utah report here: rairfoundation.com/why-is-u-s-gov…

Checks out 🎯

Accurate

Hey @GregAbbott_TX, This is how Texans feel about the Islam invasion here in Texas. Make it stop!

🚨 USHER DEFENDS DIDDY — CALLS HIM A “LEGACY FIGURE” AS THE INTERNET FLIPS ON HIM Usher says he’ll never speak negatively about Sean 'Diddy' Combs, claims what the public has seen is “misrepresented” and insists too many people benefited from what he built to ignore it. Says he has “nothing negative to say” Even now. Is this loyalty… or something deeper people don’t want exposed?

@jerryzz2 @poperespecter1 Facts

@VERVELOVE @poperespecter1 James. He can't prove it unless their usual method, argument and anger and unfounded rhetorics and tales.

Christ chose one man to be his vicar and representative on earth. Stand with him and you stand with Christ.

The Flynn Network Has Been Put On Official Notice ⚠️ Do you all see how the noose is tightening and everything is closing in? Do you see how the once safe space M. Flynn relied upon is no longer there? Do you see how once trusted circles are collapsing around M. Flynn? Who would have thought Alexis Wilkins would have dedicated a thread to The Flynn Network? I know people have their suspicions about her. I know people do not consider credible due to associations. I know people will question her motives based on certain things. But the mere fact that she is openly criticizing Michael Flynn and his henchmen out in the open tells me there will be even more ex-po-se types disclosures coming out throughout the remainder of the year by various people who have been holding their tongue. This is why I stayed on his neck for as long as I did because I knew this day would come where reality was going to catch up with these goons. Now you have people you would have never thought would come out and and expose these people. Laura Loomer Dan Bongino Alexis Wilkins These are 3 key figures who myself have targeted for various things. So think about how bad it has gotten for M. Flynn where these types of media figures are calling him to the floor.

Disclosure Pressure Points Are Being Hit: The Missing Scientists Here Is What We Need To Consider 1. Why did Wright-Patterson’s AFRL under Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland and Monica Reza’s Mondaloy program suddenly lose two of its top custodians of non-human craft materials right as Trump’s disclosure push accelerated? Track every Hangar 18-adjacent vault and the rail links feeding Pine Gap. 2. Who really owns the black-budget pipelines that funneled hundreds of billions through Lockheed Skunk Works, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and EG&G while five specialized scientists ended up dead or missing in a six-month window? Follow the money to the same bloodline conduits that still control legacy clearinghouses. 3. How deeply is the NSA’s Pine Gap station entangled with exotic propulsion testing and plasma drive validation that directly threatens the petrodollar and Rockefeller-era energy monopolies? Demand the unredacted feed logs from the Orion satellite constellation. 4. Why were elements inside AARO and its AATIP predecessors allowed to slow-walk UAP files while private cutouts continued reverse-engineering programs that violate every arms control treaty on record? Connect the dots to the same networks protecting DUMBs under Dulce, Denver Airport, and Pine Gap. 5. What exactly happened in the late 2016–early 2017 Antarctica accord that compelled legacy figures like John Kerry to signal compliance on suppressed asset releases and asset-backed resets? Track every attendee and the custodian-enforced non-escalation boundaries that still bind the deal. 6. How many surface “research campuses” in the Antelope Valley and overseas at Pine Gap’s partner nodes (Menwith Hill, etc.) hide underground extensions running illegal human-performance and consciousness-interface experiments? Demand floor plans and personnel manifests. 7. Why were five specialized scientists McCasland, Reza, Loureiro, Grillmair, and Thomas silenced or vanished in such a compressed window exactly as pressure mounted for full non-human tech disclosure, and how does their combined knowledge of exotic materials, plasma propulsion, exoplanet visitation patterns, and dual-use synthetic biology directly threaten the hidden DUMB networks and black-site operations that have operated for decades without accountability? Track every AFRL, MIT, Caltech, and Novartis connection to the same legacy contractors and agencies still guarding those vaults. 8. Who benefits if the missing scientists’ knowledge never surfaces specifically the fusion breakthroughs from Nuno Loureiro and exoplanet datasets from Carl Grillmair that confirm non-human visitation patterns? Scrutinize every “random” shooter and convenient drowning tied to MIT, Caltech, and Novartis. 9. How many “missing persons” clusters near DUMBs (Dulce, Los Alamos, Sandia) and plain-sight black sites are actually the human cost of genetic, energetic, and propulsion experiments that treat citizens as disposable test subjects? Demand the real disappearance stats versus official narratives. 10. What role did occult-tinged oversight layers in Pine Gap’s deeper geothermal chambers play in anchoring long-duration operations, and why do ritual ratios still appear in high-frequency plasma test logs? Connect this to the same energetic pacts that enforced the Antarctica armistice. For General Purposes Only You Want To Go Deeper Into These Types Of Uploads? Click Patreon Link In Bio/Profile (For Deeper Insights) Join The Red Book Club 📕

🚨SHOCKING: 🇳🇱 Geert Wilders Reveals his Plan to Take Back The Netherlands in a Speech in Hungary. "First, we will return 60,000 Syrian refugees to Syria immediately. We want all foreign criminals deported from the Netherlands."

🚨 BREAKING: In a huge FAFO moment, President Trump just PRIMARY CHALLENGED 6 Indiana "Republican" senators who blocked the state's redistricting map for 2026 The map would've helped Republicans in the midterms FAFO! 🔥 RINO Greg Walker ➡️ Michelle Davis RINO Eric Bassler ➡️ Jeff Ellington RINO Greg Goode ➡️ Brenda Wilson RINO Spencer Deery ➡️ Paula Copenhaver RINO Jim Buck ➡️ Tracey Powell RINO Travis Holdman ➡️ Blake Fiechter

Mormonism destroyed in a single verse: "Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me." —Isaiah 43:10

🚨This should alarm every believer. Citadel CEO Ken Griffin declared: “The world needs a savior, and the hope is that AI is the savior.” AI is a man-made tool, not our Redeemer. Only CHRIST holds that title!

@Alonso_GD Matthew 7:13-14 “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”

71% of the world does not believe that Jesus is God

“You’re not proving the papacy from Scripture—you’re reading later tradition into it and calling it biblical.”The Isaiah 22 comparison is overstated—similar language does not equal identical meaning. Nowhere does Jesus say Peter replaces Him as a governing authority. In fact, just a few verses later (Matthew 16:23), Jesus rebukes Peter as “Satan,” which hardly fits the idea of an unshakable foundation. Even more, the authority to “bind and loose” is later given to all the apostles (Matthew 18:18), not Peter alone—so this is shared authority, not papal supremacy. Acts doesn’t show a pope—it shows a plural leadership. James leads the council in Acts 15, not Peter. Paul even publicly rebukes Peter (Galatians 2:11), which would be unthinkable if Peter held supreme authority. And Acts 1 replacing Judas proves continuity of apostleship—not a perpetual papal office. That’s reading later church structure back into the text, which is exactly what many commentaries do.

The Biblical Case for the Pope : The most famous passage supporting the papacy is Matthew 16:16-19 but I think most people do not realize how much it says. Let's start with reviewing the text. "Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Here we have Jesus renaming Simon to Rock (Petros in Greek) and telling him that he will build his church on him that the gates of hell will not overcome. But then Jesus begins a ceremony. I call it a ceremony because it appears that Jesus is following a ceremonial formula for ordaining the Vicar (representative) of a King. Jesus, who regularly quoted from Isaiah (over 20 times), closely follows the formula in Isaiah 22:20-22. Consider: “In that day I will summon my servant, Eliakim son of Hilkiah… I will place on his shoulder the key to the house of David; what he opens no one can shut, and what he shuts no one can open." The parallels are striking. A key is given. Peter/Eliakim is then given the power to bind/shut or loose/open. The similarity of the phrasing and the tendency of Christ to quote from the prophet Isaiah make it seem HIGHLY unlikely that this is coincidental. Jesus is nearly quoting the Prophet Isaiah on purpose. What is he getting at? To understand, let’s look at who Eliakim was. He was the Vicar of King Hezekiah. And we see his role in 2 Kings 18:18. In that passage, the Assyrian Commander calls for King Hezekiah. But instead of the King going out, Eliakim is sent to speak on his behalf. Eliakim was the vicar, the representative and the spokesperson for King Hezekiah. With that in mind, let's get back to the ceremony that Jesus performed on St Peter in Matt 16:16-19. Jesus (a king) was performing a ceremony of a Vicar and the Vicar's role (as seen in 2 Kings) is to speak on behalf of the King. He is making Peter his Vicar. There are other proofs in the bible. Jesus promised that Peter would be the one to strengthen the brothers (Luke 22:31-32). In John 21:10-14 Peter hauled in the fish (a symbol for the faithful) by himself when all the disciples together couldn't do it (v6) and the text says the net did not tear (the greek for tear is schism). And throughout the book of Acts you see Peter acting as Pope. In Acts 5, it is Peter (not the other apostles) who sits in judgement of Ananias and Sapphira. In Acts 15, at the first council only Peter speaks during the deliberations and when James wraps up the discussion he quotes one person: Peter. We see St Paul say that when completed his period of contemplation, he went to Peter first (Galatians 1:18). And the list of the apostles changes in order quite a bit throughout the New Testament but it always starts with St. Peter (and ends with Judas) - the others change in order. In many cases, it just says “Peter and the others.” Peter is clearly given a unique role of leadership, vicarship of Christ, and spokesman for the Christian movement. But did he pass it on? Is it possible that Peter was indeed given a special role but that ended with Peter? The answer to this is no. The offices off the apostles were passed on. We know this both from the bible and from history. Consider Acts 1:12-26. In that passage, Judas (one of the twelve apostles) has died an ignominious death and Peter (acting as the leader of the Apostles) says that “it is necessary to choose” someone to take his office (v 20-21). The word for office here is “episkopēn” which is the Greek word for bishopfrik. And then Matthias is chosen to replace Judas “in this ministry and apostleship” (v25) and that he “was numbered with the eleven apostles.” (v26) Here we have an apostle dying and a successor being chosen. How in the world is this not apostolic succession? And, relevant to the topic of Peter, it explicitly states that Matthias would take the office (bishopfrik) of Judas. This is a handing down of an ecclesial office. And lest people think this is a one off situation with Judas, there is another very interesting account from St Clement of Rome writing in 90AD. He writes, “Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason, therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the further provision that, if they should die, other approved men should succeed to their ministry” (Letter to the Corinthians 42:4–5, 44:1–3) In short, the papacy is clearly a biblical office instituted by Christ.

Prove what you just said using scripture, you can't because it isn't in there. With that said I will show you why NOT to follow man - Jeremiah 17:5 “Thus says the Lord: ‘Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the Lord.’ 1 Corinthians 3:4-7 “For when one says, ‘I follow Paul,’ and another, ‘I follow Apollos,’ are you not being merely human? … So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth.”Matthew 23:9 “And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.”

Caught on camera: Florida DOT pulls a big rig trucker out of service after he struggles to understand English and read basic road signs. This comes after deadly crashes linked to illegal immigrants behind the wheel, and Florida troopers say nearly 50% of truckers they pull over on one major highway don’t speak English. American roads. American safety standards. No exceptions. Public safety isn’t optional.

@Sachinettiyil How about we stop promoting denominations and start focusing on what is important: spreading the good news of Christ and helping people grow in their relationship with Him. He is returning for His bride, not a denomination.

Catholics will soon surpass evangelicals in number in the United States, becoming the largest Christian denomination, according to a new report. Info: COPE

TPUSA Lawyers Threaten to Prosecute ALL Social Media Users Who Spread Erika Kirk 'Conspiracies' Have you liked or shared a video critical of Erika Kirk or TPUSA? Have you questioned the official Charlie Kirk narrative online - maybe dropped a comment, reposted a clip, or just watched a series of Candace Owens videos? Then you might want to listen to this. Because right now, if you've ever engaged with content digging into the Charlie Kirk assassination cover up, you're already being monitored and added to a list.