
C Rio
869 posts

C Rio
@VictorNate1
Learning how to reorganize my own life.


@cleranvaulk Los médicos generales del IMSS con la realidad bien alterada, buscan un aumento y no salen del paracetamol


A Harvard study just proved a man can carry LDL cholesterol of 700 for seven years and have zero plaque in his arteries. Zero. Not a single cubic millimeter. My LDL was 110 when I had my heart attack at 52. Normal. Optimal by every guideline. He had LDL 700 with clean arteries. I had LDL 110 and nearly died. If LDL caused heart disease, his arteries would be destroyed and mine would be clean. The opposite happened. Something is very wrong with the cholesterol story.









Here’s something odd. Despite the expressed certainty that high LDL is a primary cause driver of atherosclerosis, with claims like “there’s no safe level of high cholesterol” regardless of metabolic state, when I present what seems my own clear-cut case of having a total cholesterol of 700 for nearly 7 years, and then ask a simple question: How much plaque will be in my arteries? Almost nobody guesses: “a lot.” Now, to be clear, this isn’t just a basic coronary artery calcium scan I'm getting. I recently underwent an advanced coronary CT angiography, with expert-guided interpretation and AI-based quantification down to the cubic millimeter (mm3). Of note, people in their 20s and 30s often do show plaque on these scans, including some well-known nutrition influencers. One example that comes to mind is someone in the plant-based community, in his 30s, with a total plaque volume of 61.3 mm³. So I come back to the question: 👉How much plaque will be in my heart? 👉And why does it seem that no one wants to guess “a lot”? These aren’t results I could possibly fake.








a carnivore cruise?
























