Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Xsoraanti
2.5K posts
Xsoraanti
@Viewfnnancial
我是“轮运独殖”这个专用名词的发明者，把“轮运独殖”这个名词发“发扬光大”的集大成者，就是要故意单枪匹马主动深入轮运独殖大本营🐶🐶
Katılım Kasım 2023
88 Takip Edilen33 Takipçiler
美国有能力造10万吨级的核动力航母 ，万吨级的巡洋舰或驱逐舰 ，两栖攻击舰，指挥舰，还有能力造猎鹰和新格伦的回收船。
你现在断言“美国没有制造领航者搞这种船的能力”……。难道你来自平行世界?
如果，你的意思是：美国造不出所谓的“网系回收船”，那我明白的告诉你：那不是造不出 而是没必要。
Eason Wong@easonwong81
@FrankLSG 本质就是美国的船舶工业烂完了根本没有造出领航者号这种船的能力，并且spaceX是搞火箭的，没有船舶工程师，不像中国可以产业之间配合
中文
这两年墙里新出来一个洗脑宣传，说：
中国极其强大的制造业已经把新能源汽车做成了「快速消费品」，现在中国人换汽车就跟换手机一样，每两、三年就要换一台汽车。
但同时，去年以来墙里边手机销售数据是在持续下滑，反映出中国人越来越换不起新手机了！
手机都不能换新了，能快速换汽车玩，你信吗？
中文
Xsoraanti retweetledi
Bilgisayarımdaki ücretsiz antivirüs programı.
Türkçe
阎学通这番话真是一针见血，现在这算法简直是道德粉碎机，90%的流量全是假消息，越极端的越有人看，搞得真话没人信、谣言满天飞。技术跑得太快，把传播门槛降到了只要会说话就行，可咱们的精神文明根本没跟上，诚信这种底线说垮就垮。咱们普通人如果不主动跳出信息茧房、练就火眼金睛，迟早会被这低信任、高冲突的环境给吞了。
中文
这是官方发布的加速视频。对水军和粉红来说真是大水冲了龙王庙。
退一步讲，中国官方的东西有什么不能质疑的？
放眼整个地球村，当今中国名副其实的第一‘造假大国’。假民主、假选举、GDP造假，失业率造假，人均收入造假，遍地豆腐渣工程。从毒奶粉、地沟油，到运完工业煤装食用油的化工车、泛滥成灾的‘科技与狠活’化学添加剂，以及遍地横行的劣质山寨商品。在这个从国家数据到吃喝拉撒无处不造假的环境里，你们哪来的自信去盲信官方的‘真实性’？
这背后更深层的悲哀在于，系统性的集体主义洗脑抹杀了民众的批判性思维。当一个群体面对官方叙事时，连最基本的质疑勇气和探寻真相的本能都被阉割，反而去维护威权，其结果必然是纵容制度性的造假，并最终让整个社会在‘互害模式’中承担代价。
Tony Kaneshiro@Kaneshiro1960
中国的事情除非从头到尾直播、或者像SpeceX那样允许民间拍摄，否则每一个事情你都最好以怀疑的态度去审视。
中文
微博水印都在原视频上面了，饭送嘴边了不知道fact check?
这段视频本身就是直播的一部分。
殖狗智力发育缺陷这一块，
bio里还写着'反愚昧'自欺欺人这一块。
直观体现就是: 即便是开卷考试都能考零分。
Tony Kaneshiro@Kaneshiro1960
中国的事情除非从头到尾直播、或者像SpeceX那样允许民间拍摄，否则每一个事情你都最好以怀疑的态度去审视。
中文
Xsoraanti retweetledi
日本人难以理解34人的死亡人数是正常的
日本2011 年 3・11 东日本大海啸直接遇难15,901 人
另有3,784 人为灾后应激相关间接死亡
中国应对灾害的能力领先世界太多了
以至于他们完全无法理解，看着这么夸张的灾害和遇难人数，直呼假新闻，然后进一步巩固自己的刻板印象
you1126@Rb3qzWR5AK5nooA
ダムぶっ壊れて下流の集落ぜーんぶ呑み込まれとるんですけど、どうするつもりなんすかね、これ。南寧市の横県って地区。22.9429,109.32993付近。
中文
这位白皮基本盘找了一本1943年印度发布的英文版本China handbook来证明中国对南海的岛屿没有主权🤣
能不能证明南海岛屿主权我是不知道，但是可以证明印度一直是一个神奇的地方。
Bill Hayton@bill_hayton
I have bad news for the bot who goes under the name of Patrick. In 1933 and again in 1943, China officially declared that Triton Island in the Paracels was its southernmost territory - which seems to rule out a Chinese claim to Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys...
中文
@bill_hayton Legal documents need to be signed and stamped. Do you have any?
English
I have bad news for the bot who goes under the name of Patrick. In 1933 and again in 1943, China officially declared that Triton Island in the Paracels was its southernmost territory - which seems to rule out a Chinese claim to Scarborough Shoal and the Spratlys...
Patrick in China@PatrickZhengCHN
Well into the 1990s, Philippine official maps continued to depict Huangyan Dao as lying beyond its territorial limits. This position was also corroborated by official correspondence of various Philippine government agencies. In a letter dated February 5, 1990, the Philippine Ambassador to Germany stated, according to the Philippine National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, Scarborough Shoal or Huangyan Dao is not within the territorial sovereignty of the Philippines. The Certification of Territorial Boundary of the Republic of the Philippines issued by the Philippine National Mapping and Resource Information Authority on October 28, 1994, acknowledged that the territorial limits and sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines are defined by Article III of the Treaty of Peace signed on December 10, 1898, between the United States and Spain, and confirmed that the territorial limits shown in Official Map No. 25 issued by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources through the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (which depicts Huangyan Dao outside the territorial limits) are fully correct and reflect the true situation. These statements by the Philippines not only constitute counter-evidence to its own claim of territorial sovereignty over Huangyan Dao, but also subject the Philippines to the constraints of international law based on the recognition of legal facts and the principle of estoppel.
English
Xsoraanti retweetledi
一觉醒来这条居然火了😹底下依旧乌泱乌泱的粉蛆在那里直着脖子骂我。我说了啥了嘛？我特么就笑笑也不行？对你们的“伟大成就”不够严肃？马斯克的火箭没站住倒了你们不是也笑得挺开心的嘛？一群傻逼😹
Dr. Bo@BoDiplo
原来还有这一段，在官宣视频中被剪掉的。太搞了😹
中文
@XingLi_Thinking @hua980489 也是服了，这有啥好奇怪的，下面随便弄个绳索固定，很难吗？是什么高科技搞不定吗？🐶🐶
中文
First of all, congratulations to the Chinese aerospace team.
Successfully recovering the Long March 10B first stage using a cable-net capture system is an extraordinary engineering achievement. Regardless of nationality, breakthroughs like this move human spaceflight forward.
While watching the recovery video, one detail caught my attention.
After the booster was captured, the lower end appeared to oscillate more noticeably than the upper section.
As a quality engineer, my first reaction wasn’t to criticize the design.
It was simply:
Why?
My engineering mind immediately started thinking in terms of FMEA.
Was this oscillation identified during the design phase?
If so, was it evaluated and accepted because the associated risk was low?
Or is it simply an engineering trade-off that isn’t obvious from the outside?
Another question came to mind.
Would adding a secondary lower guidance or restraint point reduce the oscillation?
Or would it introduce new failure modes, additional loads, or operational complexity that outweigh the benefits?
I don’t know.
And I don’t think anyone should pretend to know based on a short video.
I’m also confident that the engineers behind this project have already considered many of these questions. Complex systems are rarely designed without extensive analysis, simulation, and testing.
That doesn’t mean there is no room for improvement.
Every successful engineering system can usually be improved further.
That’s how engineering progresses.
For me, this is what engineering is really about.
Not rushing to conclusions.
Not assuming we know the answer.
But observing carefully, asking better questions, and remaining curious enough to keep learning.
Sometimes the most valuable engineering discussion doesn’t start with an answer.
It starts with one simple question:
Why?
Ace of Razgriz@raz_liu
Full length video of the CZ-10B maiden flight from lanuching to landing. via 空天逐梦
English
@ichijisaru 花举国之力搞航天中国人早就火星殖民了
航天口预算一点都不多
要不长9ppt这么多年甲方都烦了
不调查就抒情是你这种人的通病
中文
Xsoraanti retweetledi
有人说火箭回收后还在晃，又开始嘲笑中国了！
这次火箭回收，重点不是晃不晃，而是有没有成功回收。
这是海上网系捕获，本来就有海浪、风力和钢索缓冲，火箭刚被抓住时出现一定摆动是符合工程规律的。真正重要的是火箭成功被捕获、完成固定，并达到了试验目标。
宣传片把摆动镜头剪掉了，如果把完整过程都放出来，我觉得反而更真实、更有说服力。航天试验本来就不是拍电影，工程验证看的是结果，而不是每一帧画面都完美。
这个视频陪这个BGM确实挺好笑，要懂得幽默！
中文