Vladislava

Idk how accurate this is but here

@PAHoyeck Germany and it isn’t even close

There are two types of marxism: Hegellian, or Spinozist Stalin's USSR? Hegellian CPC under Mao and Deng? Spinozist The Sino-Soviet Split was basically a battle between Hegelian and Spinozist Marxism

@SpaceRunner2917 @marcusquest 🫂

why are people so desperate to live in the past? just "retro" and "nostalgia" everywhere. why are we encouraging this?

@MC_ZOLO23 Stalin was too democratic

@Vladislava237 I respect you more for being a consistent stalinist chud, compared to OP ngl

1. Communism deprives people of their property is true and based 2. Communism is undemocratic is true and based 3. Yeah that’s a myth 4. Communism is unpatriotic is true and based

@adornos_soul Read Isaak Rubin, one of the most useful people you will ever read

I need to read more

He’s literally describing the Democrat and Republican parties

@CDMorlock @OsosYTequila Don’t cite Kampuchea 😭 that’s not one you wanna remember

List one thing Trotskyist revolutionaries have ever accomplished. Here is "socialism in one countries" list of successful revolutions: People's Republic of China (1949), Democratic People's Republic of Korea (1948), Democratic Republic of Vietnam (1945), German Democratic Republic (1949), People's Republic of Poland (1947), Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1948), Hungarian People's Republic (1949), Socialist Republic of Romania (1947), People's Republic of Bulgaria (1946), People's Republic of Albania (1946), Cuba (1959), People's Republic of Angola (1975), People's Republic of Mozambique (1975), People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (1974), People's Republic of the Congo (1969), Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (1978), Lao People's Democratic Republic (1975), People's Republic of Kampuchea (1979), People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (1967), Sandinista Nicaragua (1979), Grenada (1979), Burkina Faso (1983).

@n00bcom @LumpenMaoist I’d give an argument if she gave an actual response to mine lol

@Vladislava237 @LumpenMaoist Post ad hoc nietzschean buzzwords is not a argument.

This hasan shit is beyond embarrassing and disgusting. This is why people call us champaigne socialists.

@n00bcom @LumpenMaoist I’m not saying “no abstract norms” lol. I’m saying norms have to be analyzed in their concrete social relations. That’s the opposite of reification lol.

@Vladislava237 @LumpenMaoist You've defined reification. Now apply it: when 'no abstract norms' becomes a methodological absolute, social relations have disappeared into a thing — a rule floating free of the contradictions producing it. That's the reification happening here.

@LumpenMaoist @n00bcom You’re literally just moralfgging again instead of concretely demonstrating anything lol

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom shut the fuck up, youre the one drawing abstracts, its laughable to need to supposedly "educate" a fuckin Trans-Woman on why this is bigotry, or its association with Fascism. you are a pathetic joke

@LumpenMaoist @n00bcom That’s just what reification is lol

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom citation needed the accusation is that your attempt to pretend to be a rigoress no nonsense anti-morality dumpster of a person, isnt real fuckin Materialism, its you bein a jackass; fuck me

@LumpenMaoist @n00bcom Anti moralism within Marxism way predates the ACP lol

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom its what it is, and the fascist issue is the concept, not just the word lmfao, the idea that being ethical is "moralfggtry" is Fascist bigoted behaviour, ACP ass shite, or that stinky wanker Cutrone

@LumpenMaoist @n00bcom If meaning is relative to social relations then you can’t just declare a word bigoted in the abstract. You have to show how it concretely functions in this context to produce bigotry.

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom all shite is relative to the current paradigm, and in the current paradigm, it is bigotry; you are also undermining the historical relativity of past bigotry to modern bigotry. Regardless, the term you used is a bigoted term, idc if in 100years its no longer that

@n00bcom @LumpenMaoist Affect is not the same as materialism lol. Reification isn’t the result of “evacuating affect” whatever that means, it happens when social relations appear as things. You’re just introducing the type of abstract norm Marx attacks.

@Vladislava237 @LumpenMaoist The 'no ethics' posture performs toughness as rigor. But evacuating affect from theory doesn't produce materialism — it produces a reified subject who's internalized capital's instrumental logic and called it critique. That's not hard. That's captured

@n00bcom @LumpenMaoist The moral claim she made was not an immanent negative one lol

@Vladislava237 @LumpenMaoist Immanent negative claims are moral claims — you've conceded the argument without noticing. Capital doesn't merely describe exploitation, it indicts it. Something normative is doing work there. Refusing to name it isn't theoretical rigor. It's evasion.

Saying a word is inherently bigoted or fascist is literally the exact abstraction I’m criticizing. If the meaning of the word comes from certain social relations then that meaning is neither fixed nor transhistorical. Appealing to history literally proves my point, meanings and words change.

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom fascist adjacent language is a real ting you utter mutton chop, bigoted words are bigoted words, do I need to teach you the fuckin history, you ignorant waste of space?

@LumpenMaoist @n00bcom When you imply a term is inherently fascist that’s exactly what you’re doing lol

@Vladislava237 @n00bcom Im not you utter gimble, Im describing the scientific operation of ethical analysis. Youre talkin a whole lotta aristocratic mumbo jumbo, that I never once said

@Lynnfinished Read Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, then read Capital, then read Imperialism is the Highest Stage of Capitalism by Lenin and Imperialism and the World Economy by Bukharin

Followers who can’t read… i need more leftist theory to read, give me suggestions.

@Comrade_Ansel @Lynnfinished Do not read anything from Engels on dialectics lol. Also Pedagogy is bourgeois slop.

Engels Dialectics of Nature Pedagogy of the Oppressed Reform or Revolution Trotsky- Problems of Daily Life Women and The Family Literature and Revolution Art and Revolution The Transitional Program Marx- Capital all volumes The German Ideology Critique of the Gotha Program Grundrisse Wage Labor and Capital Value, Price, and Profit