Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mohammad Alj
2K posts

Mohammad Alj
@Voood0
Mining crypto just for fun #BTC
🌐 Katılım Kasım 2010
564 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler

Frenkie de jong costs 87 million including addons. Does that account here?
Som I Serem FCB@Somhiseremfcb
Imagina si le damos a Hansi Flick más de 100M€ para fichajes
English

@ManagerDeMadrid It's actually true they are from Angola and play for France
English

@pete_rizzo_ Why should I risk my money on an app that doesn't have a support team?
English

JUST IN: TELEGRAM JUST ANNOUNCED 100 MILLION USERS CAN NOW SEND #BITCOIN DIRECTLY TO ITS CRYPTO WALLET VIA MOONPAY
HERE WE GO 🚀


English

@durov Can you cut this BS, stop doing stupid updates, and focus a little bit on the support team? I'm still waiting for a response to my issue yet you and some of your fanboys celebrate for changes in the design of the app
English

🏈 Super Bowl Winners by Country Since 2000
2000 – 🇺🇸 United States
2001 – 🇺🇸 United States
2002 – 🇺🇸 United States
2003 – 🇺🇸 United States
2004 – 🇺🇸 United States
2005 – 🇺🇸 United States
2006 – 🇺🇸 United States
2007 – 🇺🇸 United States
2008 – 🇺🇸 United States
2009 – 🇺🇸 United States
2010 – 🇺🇸 United States
2011 – 🇺🇸 United States
2012 – 🇺🇸 United States
2013 – 🇺🇸 United States
2014 – 🇺🇸 United States
2015 – 🇺🇸 United States
2016 – 🇺🇸 United States
2017 – 🇺🇸 United States
2018 – 🇺🇸 United States
2019 – 🇺🇸 United States
2020 – 🇺🇸 United States
2021 – 🇺🇸 United States
2022 – 🇺🇸 United States
2023 – 🇺🇸 United States
2024 – 🇺🇸 United States
2025 – 🇺🇸 United States
English

@durov @EmmanuelMacron You mean just like the 1B user in telegram wich more than 50% of them are bots?
English

@EmmanuelMacron The majority of the $69B datacenter investment in France is based on a UAE intention that is neither finalized nor binding. Given the anti-tech stance of your 🤡 government, it would be a miracle if this investment ever materializes.
English

“This clown wants to make France an AI leader with €30M.”
€30 million → to attract and support around forty top-tier international researchers. They chose France for its values and its commitment to science.
Sometimes it’s too slow…
€54 billion → mobilized as early as 2022 to build France 2030. A France that advances health, climate, and fundamental science by investing boldly in artificial intelligence.
Over €100 billion → in private investment announced at the Paris AI Summit by French and international companies to develop AI in France.
That’s it?
#1 → In 2025, France ranked first among countries attracting foreign investment to build data centers. More billions invested in our regions and in our talent.
Yes. Here in France, we believe in science. And AI is here to elevate, to build, to move the world forward, not to insult. 🙊
#ForSure

English

@TraxNYC Guys just buy gold now and wait for another 20 years to make x20 easy money
English

@durov Before that can make a real support team for Telegram and fix real problems :/
English

Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert:
Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy:
1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics.
⚠️ Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse.
2. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail.
⚠️ Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo.
3. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime.
⚠️ Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda.
4. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.”
⚠️ Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition.
These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach.
✊ Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.
English

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts:
* L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected
* L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026
Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path.
First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum.
This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead.
We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs.
What would I do today if I were an L2?
* Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features
* Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets
* Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?)
From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug.
The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately).
This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add.
This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English

@durov At least they have a support team not like telegram how made me lose more than 20k with no support in my account 🤡
English

Telegram mini-apps could rise again 💪
Mini-apps remain advantageous: no installation needed, quick to launch, easy to learn, and access to a huge potential user base.
All that's needed are new developers and @durov 's support.
🎯 TON has now launched a new developer project – AppKit – a fresh way to build TON apps. I hope this will help them launch a "new NOTCOIN" – with real value and no dump.

English

Dear @durov because of the hacker who deleted my account I lost 100 badges. Can you please for the millionth time help me retrieve my account?

English

@precursorkols How is it the best when you don't have a support team for users?
English

Yes Telegram is the best.
Web3_Vibes@W3Vibes
Telegram vs WhatsApp: Elon Musk supports @durov Privacy and security are now at the forefront. This has revived the old debate about whose product is better, Durov's or Zuckerberg's. I'm completely on Musk and Durov's side here – Telegram is the best messenger in 2026
English

@ApexPredatonDCT @_GlobeObserver Maybe a real support team only can fix it
English

@Voood0 @_GlobeObserver Yeah bro that’s shit it’s a man’s worst nightmare.
I do keep pushing about a better support service.
Maybe ai will do it?
English

@ton_blockchain I believe that Telegram will never have support team
English












