Ambrose Waigwa
17.8K posts
@WAIGWAMKUU
Nairobi City Lawyer
Why would an advocate brand himself a “legal advocate?" Doesn’t that quietly imply the existence of illegal advocates?
Court erupts in laughter after Doctor Gikonyo is questioned over ‘R.G’ initials on Gachagua’s medical report
When men are so afraid of having a finger stuck up their butt to perform a lifesaving cancer screening so they come up with a blood test for it instead.Meanwhile women have been getting cracked open with the original speculum from 180 years ago and nobody seems to care.
Court declares key provisions of Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act unconstitutional, rules mandatory fee deposit bars access to justice, issues injunction halting gov’t enforcement.
"Wimbo za ABCD tuliwachia watoto!"~5-year-old Mnjoro Lasty shocks Obinna as he freestyles VJ Patelo's songs, explains the lyrics
Ogada: Impeachment is not a political ritual; it is a constitutional trial, so without procedure, the process becomes arbitrary, and this directly undermines constitutional supremacy. Absence of procedure means absence of legality. Impeachment is a quasi-judicial process, not a political vote
1. Doctor Ben is dead. 2. Doctor,Ben is dead. What is the difference between the two sentences?🤔
🔴🔴 COURT OF APPEAL WARNS LAND BUYERS AGAIN: EVEN A CLEAN TITLE CAN FALL; YEARS AFTER PURCHASE For some time now, courts have repeated one uncomfortable truth: a title deed is not always the final word. From the landmark decision in Dina Management Limited v County Government of Mombasa & Others, the message has been clear: when the root of title is questioned, a registered owner must go beyond waving a certificate and demonstrate how ownership was lawfully acquired. That principle is not new. But in Patricia Mary Clark v Godfrey Ngatia Njoroge & Others, the Court of Appeal of Kenya has now delivered a sobering reminder; and pushed the conversation further into uncomfortable territory for innocent buyers. In this case, the buyer conducted an official search, confirmed ownership at the Lands Registry, paid KSh 11 million through advocates, and obtained a certificate of lease. On paper, everything was perfect. Years later, however, the original owner emerged and denied ever selling the property. When the registry records were scrutinized, a glaring gap appeared: there was no transfer instrument showing how the seller acquired the land in the first place. The register showed movement, yes, but the paper trail, the legal spine of ownership, was missing. And that missing link changed everything. In reaffirming that the title could not stand, the Court did more than restate existing law. It reinforced a growing judicial posture: due diligence is no longer just procedural, it is substantive. The decision signals that where circumstances raise suspicion, courts may expect purchasers to interrogate the history of ownership more deeply. This is not a departure from the law established in Dina Management, but it sharpens the warning. The comfort buyers once found in searches, titles, and registry entries is steadily narrowing. The takeaway is quiet but powerful: land ownership in Kenya is no longer just about what the register says; it is increasingly about how the register came to say it. And for buyers, that means that the deeper you dig before purchase, the safer you stand years later. Kindly repost widely🙏🙏. For more info, check our profile.
A stupid person has stolen my pods akaacha case 😭😭
Leaving for Airport, I had to use Matatu, I had very little left for spending, I couldn't afford uber. For a flight leaving at 3am, I left at 10pm and arrived very early, because otherwise I wouldn't find a matatu to the airport at 2am. Regardless, We Won!
