WaNe

49.5K posts

WaNe banner
WaNe

WaNe

@WaNeInTime

Here we stand like a couple of fools...(Suzi Quattro) Reposting is not always approval. Usually it is a kind of archiving𓅃

Katılım Eylül 2021
741 Takip Edilen534 Takipçiler
WaNe retweetledi
Bohunk Supremacist
Bohunk Supremacist@BohunkSupremacy·
Péter Magyar in his press conference right now directly confronting the Slovakian state for the Benes Decrees: post-WWII legislation, still enforced, that imposes collective guilt on ethnic Hungarians and Germans and allows Slovak state to confiscate land from them on that basis.
English
5
11
130
5.4K
WaNe retweetledi
Fabio De Masi 🦩
Fabio De Masi 🦩@FabioDeMasi·
Wenn man ihn wenigstens ans Kreuz nageln könnte …
Fabio De Masi 🦩 tweet media
Deutsch
40
30
182
4.8K
WaNe retweetledi
Pflegeherz 
Pflegeherz @Pflegeherz12·
3/1 Und sie schauen jetzt wieder zu wie ein Teil der Gesellschaft "Energieprämien" bekommt: Hol Euch der Teufel! Unsereins noch einmal in einem sozialen Beruf arbeiten? Nicht mal im volltrunkenen Zustand!
Deutsch
1
1
6
82
WaNe retweetledi
Harry Sisson
Harry Sisson@harryjsisson·
Trump is having a mental health episode right now. He’s been posting on social media all night. He posted at: 9:49pm (Ai Jesus photo) 9:50pm (Trump tower on moon) 10:10pm (dumb meme) 10:32pm (news clip) 10:53pm (news clip) 12:43am (announcing Hormuz blockade) 2:35am (article about Biden) 2:36am (article on naval blockade) 2:37am (article on Rep. Swalwell) 2:37am (posted the same article about Biden again) 2:38am (article on his ballroom) 4:10am (article on Iran) He’s not sleeping, he’s pretending to be Jesus, and he’s posting all night. He’s not well.
English
2.5K
13.4K
58.2K
2.6M
WaNe retweetledi
Ugo Bardi
Ugo Bardi@ugo_bardi·
We are facing the start of a new cycle of global military build-up that may be disastrous because it coincides with a larger civilization cycle that’s taking us to economic decline. A new world war is the fastest way to the collapse of civilization senecaeffect.substack.com/p/iran-the-rea…
Ugo Bardi tweet media
English
0
3
6
99
WaNe retweetledi
Branko Milanovic
Branko Milanovic@BrankoMilan·
Killing diplomatic representative who come to negotiate was a practice morally abhorred by 5,000 years of civilization. But now--after the last month's wanton killings of leaders--it seems to have become accepted as a normal practice. The descent into extraordinary barbarism is extraordinarily rapid.
English
34
678
2.9K
233.9K
WaNe retweetledi
Zack Beauchamp
Zack Beauchamp@zackbeauchamp·
I've seen a lot of takes that Orbán's defeat means that he was never an authoritarian in the first place. This is completely wrong — and, in fact, betrays a complete misunderstanding of both Hungarian politics and modern authoritarianism. Here's why.
English
120
1.1K
6.5K
631.5K
WaNe retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A Soviet psychologist walked into a café in 1927 and watched a waiter do something impossible. He remembered every open order at every table. Perfectly. Without notes. Without effort. Then a table paid their bill. She asked him to repeat the order. He couldn't remember a single item. She spent the next two years figuring out why. What she found is now the operating system underneath every platform fighting for your attention. Her name was Bluma Zeigarnik, and she was a graduate student at the time, sitting with her professor Kurt Lewin, watching the waiters work the room. What caught her attention was something so ordinary that it had been happening in restaurants for centuries without anyone asking why. The waiters could remember every open order with perfect accuracy. Table four wanted the schnitzel with no sauce. Table seven had changed their wine twice. Table twelve owed for three coffees and a dessert. Every detail, held without effort, without notes, without any visible system at all. But the moment a table paid their bill, the information vanished. Completely. Lewin tested it on the spot. He called a waiter back minutes after a table had settled up and asked him to recite the order. The waiter could not do it. Not partially. Not approximately. The information was simply gone. Zeigarnik went back to her lab and spent the next two years turning that observation into one of the most replicated findings in the history of psychology. Here is what she proved, and why it changes how you think about attention, memory, and almost every piece of media you have ever consumed. She gave participants a series of tasks. Some tasks they were allowed to finish. Others were interrupted before completion. Then she tested recall across both groups. The unfinished tasks were remembered at nearly twice the rate of the completed ones. Not slightly better. Nearly twice. The brain was holding the incomplete work in a state of active tension, returning to it, keeping it warm, refusing to file it away. The finished tasks were closed, archived, released. The unfinished ones were still running. She called it the resumption goal. When the brain commits to a task and cannot complete it, it opens a file that stays open until resolution arrives. That open file consumes a portion of your cognitive bandwidth whether you are thinking about it consciously or not. It surfaces in idle moments. It pulls at the edge of your attention during other work. It is the thing you find yourself thinking about in the shower when you were not trying to think about anything at all. This is not a flaw in human cognition. It is a feature. The brain evolved to finish things. An open loop is a signal that something important is unresolved. Keeping that signal active increases the probability that you will return to it and complete it. In an environment where most tasks had real survival stakes, this was an extraordinarily useful mechanism. In the modern world, it is the most exploited vulnerability in human attention. Netflix did not invent the cliffhanger. But it industrialized it in a way no medium before it ever had. When a show ends on an unresolved question, it does not just create curiosity. It opens a file in your brain that stays active until the next episode closes it. The autoplay countdown that begins at 15 seconds is not a convenience feature. It is a precise calculation about how long the average person can tolerate an open loop before the discomfort of not knowing overrides every other intention they had for the evening. One more episode is not a choice. It is your brain doing exactly what it was designed to do: return to what is unfinished. The writers who built Lost, Breaking Bad, and Succession understood this intuitively without ever reading a psychology paper. Every episode ended on an open question. Every season finale answered three things and opened five more. The entire architecture of prestige television is a Zeigarnik machine running at industrial scale. But television is not where this gets dangerous. Every notification on your phone is an open loop. Every unread email is an open loop. Every task you wrote on a list and have not yet crossed off is an open loop. Each one is consuming a small but real portion of your available attention, pulling fractionally at your focus, degrading your capacity to be fully present in whatever you are actually doing right now. TikTok's algorithm does not just serve you content you like. It serves you content that ends one loop and immediately opens another, keeping the resumption system permanently activated so the cost of stopping always feels higher than the cost of continuing. The research on this accumulation effect is striking. Psychologists studying cognitive load have found that unfinished tasks do not sit passively in memory. They actively interrupt. They surface at the wrong moments. They are the reason you are reading something and suddenly remember an email you forgot to send. The brain is not malfunctioning. It is running its resumption system exactly as designed. It is just running it across forty open loops simultaneously, in an environment that generates new ones faster than any human nervous system was built to process. The most important practical implication Zeigarnik's research produced is one that most people use backwards. David Allen built his entire Getting Things Done system on the insight that the only way to close a cognitive open loop is to either complete the task or make a trusted commitment to complete it later. Writing something down in a system you actually trust has the same effect on the brain as finishing it. The file closes. The bandwidth is released. This is why writing a task down feels like relief even before you have done anything about it. You have not solved the problem. You have simply told your brain that the loop is registered and will be returned to, which is enough for the resumption system to stand down. The inverse is equally true and far more destructive. Every task that lives only in your head, unwritten and unscheduled, is an open loop burning cognitive resources around the clock. The mental cost is not proportional to the size of the task. A tiny nagging obligation consumes the same active tension as a major project. Your brain does not discriminate by importance. It discriminates by completion. Zeigarnik published her findings in 1927. The paper sat in academic literature for decades before anyone outside psychology paid attention to it. Then television got good. Then the smartphone arrived. Then the entire attention economy was engineered, largely by people who understood intuitively what she had proven scientifically: an open loop is the most powerful hook available to anyone who wants to hold human attention. Netflix knew it. Instagram knew it. Every designer who ever made a notification badge red instead of grey knew it. The café in Vienna is long gone. The mechanism she discovered there is now the operating system underneath every platform fighting for your time. Every "to be continued." Every unread notification. Every thread that ends with "part 2 tomorrow." All of it is the same waiter, the same unpaid bill, the same brain refusing to let go of what it has not yet finished. Zeigarnik noticed it over coffee in 1927. A century later, it is the most valuable insight in the history of media. And nobody taught it to you in school.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
225
2.4K
8.3K
785.6K
WaNe retweetledi
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
Your Android phone is sending data to Google every 4.5 minutes. Even when you're not touching it. Even when the screen is off. A peer-reviewed study from Trinity College Dublin confirmed it. 12 settings to change right now:
English
179
3.7K
15.7K
1.5M
WaNe retweetledi
Alex Plitsas 🇺🇸
Alex Plitsas 🇺🇸@alexplitsas·
Happy to report that @shellykittleson is on her way to recovery and the epitome of resilience You’ll hear from her soon Thank you to everyone who helped to set her free
Alex Plitsas 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
64
159
1.4K
102K
WaNe retweetledi
Emma Fourreau
Emma Fourreau@emma_frr·
(Bella) Ciao Orbán 👋
Emma Fourreau tweet media
Magyar
214
233
3.3K
41.8K
WaNe retweetledi
f.luebberding
f.luebberding@luebberding·
Dieser sogenannte Autoritarismus in Ungarn war schon immer Propaganda. Orban hat weder Gesetze gemacht, die die Delegitimierung des Staates betreffen, noch daran gedacht, Oppositionsparteien zu verbieten. Er hat aber eine Machtmaschine aufgebaut, die an die Hochzeiten der CSU in Bayern erinnerte. Budapest und München gehörten der Opposition. Der Rest des Landes der Fidesz bzw. der CSU. Aber wie immer in der Politik: Nach fest kommt ab. Irgendwann ist man der Alleinherrschaft überdrüssig. Ich bin übrigens gespannt, ob jemand in Sachsen-Anhalt einem Ministerpräsidenten der AfD zum Wahlsieg gratuliert.
Deutsch
10
19
107
4.4K
WaNe retweetledi
Very Brexit Problems
Very Brexit Problems@VeryBrexitProbs·
Another historic triumph for MAGA diplomacy
Very Brexit Problems tweet media
English
19
35
265
4.1K
WaNe retweetledi
Lafargue
Lafargue@G_Platzdasch·
Eine Debatte zwischen Václav Havel, Viktor Klima, Adam Michnik und @PM_ViktorOrban | Moderation: Timothy Garton Ash (26. Juni 1999 @IWM_Vienna)
Lafargue tweet media
Dansk
1
5
17
392
WaNe retweetledi
Michel Bauwens
Michel Bauwens@mbauwens·
* On Karl Polanyi's (The Great Transformation) influence in China karlpolanyisociety.com/2021/05/28/pol… "In 2007, the first simplified Chinese translation of The Great Transformation was published in mainland China. Today, Chinese scholars not only refer to Polanyi’s theory in order to explain the problems in China’s reform and opening-up process, but also develop a global vision and try to reflect on the structural problems with modern complex societies."
English
0
52
199
19.3K
WaNe retweetledi
Cris Tina
Cris Tina@CSibiescu·
Anca Bulgaru
Cris Tina tweet media
Português
0
3
10
42
Emanuel Ciocu
Emanuel Ciocu@ECiocu·
O să vină o recesiune de o să ne căsătorim din nou din dragoste.
Română
12
4
160
2.9K