Scarlet Witch
889 posts


5/13 Notable Flow $F 15 C 06/18/2026 $1M .21avg 11% OTM $FCEL 32 C 06/18/2026 $1.8M 2.01avg $FIVN 22.5 C 10/16/2026 $9.6M 3.52avg $FRMI 15 C 11/20/2026 $3.1M .92avg 150% OTM (ER Tm) $LYV 185 C 01/15/2027 $4M 14.72avg 10% OTM $MBLY 15 C 01/15/2027 $1.7M 1.15avg 42% OTM $NOK 18 C 07/17/2026 $1.2M .93avg 22% OTM $NXE 13 C 06/18/2026 $2.4M .69avg $SONY 27.5 C 10/16/2026 $295K 1.06avg 21% OTM







This name has MOONSHOT POTENTIAL — similar to $NVDA in the early 2000s. $IONQ is one of the leaders in quantum computing and uses a unique trapped-ion approach that many consider technologically superior to several competitors such as Google, Rigetti, or IBM. Why it’s interesting: - Backlog of ~$470M → roughly 2.5x LTM revenue (unique in quantum space) - Around 60% of revenue already comes from commercial customers → a strong sign of real-world traction and demand But let’s be clear: An investment in $IONQ still involves significant risk. Just like early $NVDA: - The company is still highly unprofitable - Valuation remains extremely elevated - The future potential is enormous — but far from guaranteed The parallels are interesting: $NVDA was once seen as → “the future of graphics & AI” $IONQ could become → “the future of quantum computing” Among pure-play quantum companies, $IONQ likely has one of the most asymmetric setups. Its future is still uncertain — just like early-stage $NVDA once was. The real question is: How are you positioning yourselves?













