WhiteAlex

THIS must go viral. THIS battle must not be contained to the courtrooms. The message must be that the INALIENABLE RIGHT of White Americans to freely associate and to advocate for our interests as a people SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED anymore! All laws & practices which do so must end!

They will never leave us alone. They will never let us be. We’re going to have to make them

“If I had only one piece of advice to give my compatriots, it would be this, because it entails all the others: that they open their eyes and believe them; that they trust themselves, their experience, their sorrow; and that, in judging what is taking place, they not trust to the media-political complex, which has constantly deceived them for twenty years. It stole their eyesight, it stole their words, it even stole their outrage and their suffering, all of which were accused, should they dare express themselves, of narrow-mindedness and racism. For every person, the most urgent revolt consists in rejecting this other replacement, that of their own personality and of their deepest convictions by the tireless propaganda of the replacist power.” - Renaud Camus

We all need to help win this fight for OUR freedom of association.

@VDAREJamesK I've clogged up the comment section on this great show, for which I apologize, but I also have to give kudos and a response to your approach about "what can we each do". HOW depend on who each of us are, but we do have to connect up with other Whites somehow/somewhere TO HELP.

Going live at 7PM EST to talk about what kind of issues Identitarians need to think about if we are to get serious about power. Room's open, link here to join. rumble.com/v7a6w9a-identi…

You made a great important point about the Left rhetorical game: "it's not the immigrants, it's the billionaires". Then you underline that THE RICH & CONNECTED ARE THE ONES BRINGING THE REPLACEMENTS & DOING ECONOMIC REPLACEMENT EVERYWHERE. I think we have to lean into that fact 100 times harder, and put the onus on them to prove otherwise or change course tangibly. Remember when they were all kneeling and sending gazillions to Black Lives Matter? How they were committing to hiring more diversity and "more BIPOC representation", and then nons and foreigners were virtually all that was getting hired, and then every commercial and TV show and movie had a sudden noticeable dramatically-more-nonwhite demographic shift? We need to make the rich & connected kneel before us, kiss our White asses with enthusiasm, committing to our people's representation and wellbeing and make tangible changes like THAT for our people. We need to make them substantially hire, invest in and donate to White America. Not just in words, but in real numbers and dollars, at least as much as they've done for every other nonwhite identity and interest group.

"The economic elites in this country are going to have a very simple choice, whether they like it or not, not that dissimilar from what they faced in Italy in the 1920s: you're either going to get expropriation of wealth by your bitterest enemies, or you're going to have to be subordinated to nationalist politics". YES!

@VDAREJamesK "The purpose of every revolutionary movement is to build a new aristocracy, and the purpose of every new aristocracy is ultimately to build a new state". 👌

@VDAREJamesK "What are we actually trying to do here? ...We're building a state in miniature." BINGO.

I'm finally getting a chance to listen to this podcast called "What is Our Platform?" Haven't finished it yet, but I think the reframe here is refreshing and helpful. Give it a listen.

We have to storm the quoted rainbow bro's "the rich always have [been the problem]" argument more powerfully. His statement can confuse, because there's a sense in which THAT IS OBVIOUSLY TRUE in modern times. "The rich" are economically cheating through replacement. Replacement labor & consumers. Replacement financing & markets. Regimes subsidize so much of this; nonprofits subsidize another part. We have to confront the fact that the entire economic system runs on Replacement now (and they'll even admit it). The political, legal and 'moral' structures & forces of today ENSURES that continues. We'll never successfully accomplish remigration at scale and keep them out permanently without confronting and overcoming this whole systemic engine of antiwhitism and replacism for "muh economy" and greed. Even people who become racially aware & concerned about civilizational decline into ruin will still find themselves trapped by the not-so-Invisible-Hand of ever-expanding economic replacement cheating schemes that are the rule and norms now and become an anchor dragging down everyone else. "We can't find native workers" they say...as if these same people weren't all responsible for a system that has drugged, degenerated, demoralized, stupefied and sidelined our young and not-so-young generations slated for the Great Replacement. All while racially abusing us & dispossessing us of our nationhoods, while their third world pets were literally raping and murdering so many of us, and while making sure that every potential path to a real reform remedy or a potent identity politics for us was welded shut.

Life hasn’t improved because the browns haven’t left yet, there is just less coming in. Get net migration well into the -100,000s per year consistently and watch how life drastically improves in every conceivable way.

The Great Replacement is a theory in the same way that Gravity is a theory.

If the presence of foreigners motives the infringement of our freedom of speech... THE FOREIGNERS MUST ALL GO!

Blood on the hands of every single person who ever advocated for more immigration or pushed back against Remigration. If that’s you reading this, then it’s time to change your ways. We’re running out of time. There are no excuses anymore. Everyone can see the reality. Turn back. Remigration. Every single one.

RTTL was explicitly a bid to provoke a lawsuit and give Freedom of Association its rightful day in court. This is a good thing, but it will be a long, uphill road. Consider supporting them.

I believe that this lawsuit shows the importance of what RTTL is doing in defending a legal precedent for what they are doing. I believe they will win. It is time for everyone to put their differences aside and recognize the importance of the moment.

Legal immigration is a greater institutional, cultural, and political problem than illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is already against the law and just needs to be enforced, and can be very easily. Reversing the consequences of legal immigration, however, will require the creation of new laws, the hardening of soft heads, and will blur the lines of bourgeois conceptions of morality.

Help us defeat the NAACP:

“The cynicism that regards all hero worship as comical is always shadowed by a sense of physical inferiority.” The passage above comes from Yukio Mishima’s “Sun and Steel,” and it perfectly encapsulates a civilizational posture: the intrinsic weakness at the heart of much that is wrong with the West today. When a people, and thus a civilization, loses confidence in the reality of strength, it does not openly deny it at first. It ridicules it. It becomes naturally cynical, projecting its own inferiority outward, until laughter becomes a method of reduction and exposure, and anything elevated, anything above the merely human cycle of biological maintenance, anything beyond life for the sake of living, is treated as secretly base. Heroism begins precisely where this instinct ends: in the willingness to face death rather than cling to mere existence. Mishima is describing a specific value system, one the West once embraced and embodied until very recently: the conviction that strength is real, capable of being given form and incarnated in man, so that the hero is not an illusion, but something living and necessary for individual excellence and civilizational greatness. Mockery of such things comes from those who cannot possess them. The cynic laughs at the hero because he stands at a distance from him. Eric Kripke, the creator of “The Boys,” is explicit here. Remove power from the “strong man,” and he is nothing: cowardly and pathetic. Strength is treated not as an intrinsic quality, cultivated by the effort to elevate and transcend oneself until it is formed in body and spirit through the will, but as an external prop. Take it away, and the man collapses into weakness. This, of course, is not merely a narrative choice. It reflects Kripke’s own manner of thinking, and the broader cultural zeitgeist of which he is a symptom. Kripke is very much a “man” of today, cynical toward strength and suspicious of the elevation it may bestow, instinctively hostile to the heroic because it exposes the cowardice that permeates him and those like him. This is why the scene matters. A singular pathological case is made to stand as a judgment upon strength itself. Homelander is not treated as a corrupt parody of heroism, but as the revelation of what heroism supposedly always was beneath the mask. From this perspective, strength must be shown a priori to be hollow, until the very notion of superiority itself, the possession of capacity above and beyond the average, can be recast as fraud and whatever once commanded admiration is made contemptible. The fantasy is revealing, for that is what it is: a fantasy. One does not overcome the strong man by surpassing him, nor by forming a higher type. Instead, one imagines him disarmed and cornered, deprived of every advantage, and then declares: “Behold, he is nothing.” It is a victory staged in the mind of those who resent what they lack, not one that reflects strength and thus the power that flows from it in the real world. Western modernity has produced a type that cannot participate in heroism, because he clings to life for the sake of mere living and cannot imagine anything higher than biological preservation. He therefore diminishes the heroic, treating it as absurd and fraudulent, until the heroic ideal is cut down to size, not by being surpassed, but by being exposed as hollow and wholly artificial, emptied of substance. What “The Boys” does is go even further. It does not simply mock heroes from the outside. It redefines heroism itself as inherently fraudulent. The strong man is not tragically flawed or morally ambiguous. He is, in essence, already weak, and strength is merely the mask he wears to conceal the weakness beneath. Here Mishima’s observation cuts directly to the heart of the matter. The impulse to treat hero-worship as naïve or laughable, to insist that all figures of power are secretly weak, arises from a deeper incapacity to affirm strength as something real and desirable. It is safer to believe that there is nothing to rise toward, because today comfort for the sake of comfort has become inseparable from mere life itself, until it becomes the supreme moral imperative of the age. As Mishima wrote, “We live in an age in which there is no heroic death.” A society that no longer believes in the reality of strength will not produce heroes. It will produce narratives that function as simulacra of life, in which strength is always unmasked as illusion, admiration gives way to irony, and the figure once worthy of reverence is reduced to something contemptible enough to be safely dismissed. In that sense, the treatment of Homelander is not just about one character. It reflects a deeper instinct to neutralize the very idea of the heroic, so that what once inspired awe must first be pathologized, then exposed as fraud, until nothing remains above the level of the cynic who judges it. If we, as a people and therefore as a civilization, wish to rise triumphant once more, we must cease apologizing for strength and embrace again that which is heroic.

...or sometimes they're playing as The Other Guy.

It's the wrath of egalitarians, antiwhites and economically motivated bugmen playing as God.