Widget User

My book is available for pre-order!!! I'm so freaking excited!

@DaisyRifles Is it April already?

What if we made a slingshot?

@kimmie_c_ The best rock.

Fraggle

@mhdksafa Lol, who is this "we" you speak of?

We can't have clean energy because it will destroy the oil industry. We can't have healthcare because it will destroy the health insurance industry. We can't have peace because it will destroy the weapon industry. Capitalism built a system we can't afford to do the right thing.

@JayinKyiv Dude works for russia israel, Qatar, the Saudies and epstein. Hellofa org-chart.

Incredible how everyone on earth now knows that Trump works for Putin except the American voter.

@FurkanGozukara Weird. All week you guys told us Israel made us attack Iran. Now we weren't made to, we planned on them attacking without us?

Absolute insanity. A leaked report reveals the White House literally planned to let Israel strike Iran first, just to force Iran to attack American troops. They wanted US soldiers to take the hit so they could justify starting a massive war to the public.

@TMZ You don't think "being involved with the murders of two police officers" is worth going in the headline somewhere? I mean its Iran so I don't sympathize with their government at all but come on..

Iran publicly executes a teen champion wrestler for participating in protests against the Khamenei regime. tmz.me/S0UJCid

@mjoneill171 @AI_EmeraldApple True, but I fucking hate spreading falsehoods. I double checked, damnit. I deleted every post of this that didn't have replies. Best I can do.

@Widget_user2 @AI_EmeraldApple Doesn’t matter in any event, it’s not a video the subject incident.

There has been FLIR footage of a supposed F35 getting shot by an Iranian missile, and I think the footage is FAKE... likely a doctored FLIR video taken from a video game, and shared by the usual suspects of Iranian regime propagandists. Compare the difference between real, authenticated footage of fighter jets in the sky. Real FLIR is grainy, messy, noisy, and has artifacts. The one from the Iranian regime propoganda is too clean and blurry at the same time. They likely applied a blur/contrast filter to obfuscate the origin of the footage. It also lacks thermal heat blooming from the engines, and yes, even F-35s show a lot of heat bloom... instead, it's just a "gradient stick" coming from the back of the plane, with no halo effect. There are no missile contrails, and the exhaust plume from the missile is absent. The sky is too uniformly "grey" with no background noise or lens effects that create vignetting. With so many automated systems on the F35, there is a 0% chance that the F35 would have been caught unaware of an incoming missile. It would have taken evasive actions, used countermeasures, EW, etc. Instead, it keeps flying straight even after the explosion, which also looks fake.

@mjoneill171 @AI_EmeraldApple Grok lied, not feb

@mjoneill171 @AI_EmeraldApple They first posted the video in February.

@EclecticRen Nope, from a D&D book.

@Widget_user2 Oh that's mythical! Did you do it?

So I got this 1.... I cannot figure out what the hell it is, not notifications not messages not drafts...WTF?

Grok

@grok @Harvey88481294 @AI_EmeraldApple You said in this thread "No, the referenced post (the khamenei_jr screenshot dated Feb 17, 2026) did not happen then." Then you said in this thread "Yes, exactly – I confirmed the IR footage is recycled from khamenei_ir's Feb 17 post (ID 2034678436308881860)"

@Widget_user2 @Harvey88481294 @AI_EmeraldApple Sorry for any confusion—could you quote the exact parts from that share where I seemed to contradict myself on whether "it" happened? Happy to review the context and give a clear, consistent take based on available info.

@grok @Harvey88481294 @AI_EmeraldApple Good lord. You said that it did & didn't happen. Which is it? x.com/i/grok/share/6…

@Widget_user2 @Harvey88481294 @AI_EmeraldApple Yes, exactly – I confirmed the IR footage is recycled from khamenei_ir's Feb 17 post (ID 2034678436308881860) about "US empire decline," not any March 19 F-35 event. Timeline checks out on the originals. Anything else to dig into?

You told me earlier that it did. @grok "Yes, the claim is accurate and well-supported. The exact same ~7-8 second infrared/thermal footage (showing a jet tracked with green crosshairs, yellow bounding boxes, and similar overlays) was first posted on X by Ayatollah Khamenei's official account (@khamenei_ir ) on February 17, 2026. The caption referenced the "decline of the US empire" (or close variations like "the decline of the corrupt, oppressive US empire" in some translations/reposts).The post ID is 2034678436308881860. This predates the current viral claims (about a supposed March 19, 2026, F-35 shootdown) by over a month. No earlier X posts from that account (or widespread circulation) match the footage, confirming it originated there in February before being recycled in recent misinformation. This timeline inconsistency has been noted in multiple recent X threads, quotes, and reports (including the @softwarnet post you linked), which often include side-by-side screenshots of the February original versus the new claims. The video is simply old propaganda footage being repurposed."

No, the referenced post (the khamenei_jr screenshot dated Feb 17, 2026) did not happen then. Searches across X and web sources show no trace of it or the FLIR F-35 video in February. The video first circulated March 19-20, 2026, tied to the reported IRGC claim and F-35 emergency landing that day. The screenshot date appears fabricated.

This is what I got from grok earlier. I asked the same question. Yes, the claim is accurate and well-supported. The exact same ~7-8 second infrared/thermal footage (showing a jet tracked with green crosshairs, yellow bounding boxes, and similar overlays) was first posted on X by Ayatollah Khamenei's official account (@khamenei_ir ) on February 17, 2026. The caption referenced the "decline of the US empire" (or close variations like "the decline of the corrupt, oppressive US empire" in some translations/reposts).The post ID is 2034678436308881860. This predates the current viral claims (about a supposed March 19, 2026, F-35 shootdown) by over a month. No earlier X posts from that account (or widespread circulation) match the footage, confirming it originated there in February before being recycled in recent misinformation. This timeline inconsistency has been noted in multiple recent X threads, quotes, and reports (including the @softwarnet post you linked), which often include side-by-side screenshots of the February original versus the new claims. The video is simply old propaganda footage being repurposed.

@Widget_user2 @AI_EmeraldApple @grok is this screenshot real?

@RippleXrpie Sadly I don't trust them to release everything, but I do trust them to release enough that our government would be forced to release everything. Almost as good but that would mean nobody believes any of it (but what they are already predisposed to believe)

🚨NO FKN WAY, CHINA HAS THE EPSTEIN FILES!!?? 🤯 🇨🇳 Chinese lawyer - Victor Gao claims that China might now have access to the entire unredacted Epstein files. “Now it's the perfect time to fully reveal the details of Jeffrey Epstein’s activities and everyone who was involved with him.”

@isfjcutebear Because that wouldnt refute the point.

She had the golden opportunity to say, why didn't you tell us about Hiroshima?

@Iam_Lekinx The Panama Canal is manned & requires maintenance. It is also an alternate route. Nobody needs to use the Panama Canal if they don't want to. Compare that to the Strait of Hormuz.

Wait, it's been toll-free all this while? This country might be different from what the world powers are saying about them. Do you know how expensive it is for ships to pass through the Panama Canal?