Adam Wilkinson 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

19.7K posts

Adam Wilkinson 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Adam Wilkinson 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@Wilki_Adam

Katılım Ekim 2011
180 Takip Edilen492 Takipçiler
Mike Bird
Mike Bird@Birdyword·
Many people do not seem to want data centres built near them, despite the fact that they don't cause that much traffic and often generate a lot of local tax revenue. I suspect it's partly because they're ugly! My proposal:
Mike Bird tweet media
English
1.5K
1.4K
16.8K
2.9M
Doc Watson
Doc Watson@docbankholiday·
@stewartbrand The only upside of Banksy. It exposes the ignorant wankers who think he’s talented.
English
1
0
3
432
Stewart Brand
Stewart Brand@stewartbrand·
One of the best statues ever...
Stewart Brand tweet media
English
105
484
4.8K
147.5K
RadioGenoa
RadioGenoa@RadioGenoa·
Which politician would you bring back to life to solve Europe's problems?
English
1.2K
54
895
91.9K
RetiredYoungInBangkok
RetiredYoungInBangkok@Brandonwords·
@Wilki_Adam @LukeDashjr @tanpukunokami The 2nd income has huge diminished returns. It's much better to have one parent stay home. Zero daycare costs. Much better chances of having great kids. Huge grocery savings. Other savings like coupon clipping and repairing clothes.
English
1
0
1
15
NyanChuu🔮🇯🇵🍭
NyanChuu🔮🇯🇵🍭@tanpukunokami·
A Japanese parent's tweet just blew up on X. It pretty much sums up why Japan's birthrate keeps falling. The post: "Daycare costs me ¥80,000 a month ($530). Add a second kid and it jumps to ¥120,000. A second child? Yeah, no thanks." The replies were brutal: "Work penalty + parenting penalty." "The more you earn, the more it hurts." How daycare actually works in Japan: ∙ Fees scale with household income — not flat ∙ High earners (¥9M/year+, around $60K) can pay ¥80,000/month per kid ∙ Ages 0–2 are the priciest. 3–5 have been free since 2019. ∙ The gap between cities can hit ¥1M ($6,500) per kid, per year ∙ Tokyo made the first child free in Sept 2025. Almost no one else has. A couple making $60–80K/year already gets hammered by income tax, residence tax, and social insurance. Tack on $6,500/year per kid in daycare, and a lot of families just give up on a second one — or pull back at work. Tokyo keeps calling the falling birthrate "a national crisis." The system keeps making parenting feel like a punishment for the people who work hardest. The top reply: "Just make daycare fees the same nationwide. Please."
NyanChuu🔮🇯🇵🍭 tweet media
English
500
716
6K
243.8K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Switzerland to vote on capping its population at 10 million.
English
968
984
17.3K
8.2M
RadioGenoa
RadioGenoa@RadioGenoa·
To clean the streets in Africa, due to the huge amount of waste, they use bulldozers.
English
858
1.5K
8.6K
1.4M
John Olooney
John Olooney@OlooneyJohn·
you still fancy that new EV ?
Susanne Delaney@SuzieD755164

⚠️ WARNING: FACIAL SCANNING MANDATORY IN ALL EU VEHICLES They say it is just "for your safety" (just like age verification is just to "keep the kids safe online") but did you know as of July 7, 2024, all newly registered cars in the EU must be fitted with specific driver-monitoring systems. By 2026 and 2027, this will apply to every single new vehicle sold on the European market (heavy trucks). If you buy a new car it will have a camera looking at your face, but it is (FOR NOW) legally barred from "recognising" you or saving that video. It is there to beep at you if you fall asleep or look at your phone. Except it isn't... as it looks like they can use this data in court against you (see below). The EU's General Safety Regulation (GSR2) mandates two specific systems: DDAW (Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning): Monitors your "fatigue level" by analysing how you steer or by using cameras to watch for yawning and long eye-closures. ADDW (Advanced Driver Distraction Warning): This is the more "advanced" part for 2026/2027. It uses cameras to track your gaze. If you look away from the road (at a phone or a passenger) for more than 6 seconds (at low speeds) or 3.5 seconds (at high speeds), the car alerts you (who will it alert in the future though? What legal punishment will you be subjected to? What penalties will you recieve? Will you be able to even start your vehicle if you break rules? EU law (GDPR) supposedly governs how these "face-scanning" cameras work to ensure they don't become surveillance tools but do we REALLY believe we are not headed into a centralised system of global governance and mass surveillance (digital ID for "your convenience" is being rolled out across many countries as is facial recognition tech - it is in your supermarkets at the self service checkouts for example). They claim that laws already in place (laws can be changed in the future...remember "emergency legislation" that restricted your freedom of movement?) forbids using this technology for biometric identification (facial recognition). The car "sees" a human face to track eye movement, but it is not allowed to "know" who you are (supposedly). It is claimed a closed-loop System means your data must stay inside the car (but can be used in court remember!). The camera’s "vision" is processed in real-time by a local chip and then "immediately overwritten" (supposedly). EU cars are "generally" prohibited from sending your video or "distraction logs" to the cloud, manufacturers, or insurance companies (supposedly). The EU does not CURRENTLY mandate a "breathalyzer" or "kill switch for everyone" (kill switch will knock off your car and prevent you starting or driving it). Instead, they mandate that all new cars must have a standardised interface that makes it easy for authorities to install an alcohol interlock device. So yes, authorities CAN interfere with your vehicle and movements. Since July 2024, all new EU cars must also have an Event Data Recorder (a black box recorder). Why? If your data is yours and isn't going to be shared? They say this is purely for recording technical data (speed, braking, steering) in the seconds before a crash. This can and will be used as evidence against you. They claim these systems are anonymous and cannot be used to identify the driver or owner; its "only legal purpose" is to help investigators understand why an accident happened (will this always be the case though?) Now if you have read all of and think it is necessary then you are welcoming a lockstep loss of your privacy and rights. You are accepting being treated as a criminal before you ever have even committed a crime. You are accepting pre-emtive evidence gathering before you have ever committed a crime, and remember a crime could be anything in their eyes. They make the rules, and those who swap liberty for "security" and a surveillance state [by accepting that] will regret it. But by then it will be too late. By Susanne Delaney

English
11
32
62
2.9K
Adam Wilkinson 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
@mohammedakunjee Nobody is looking at the money itself. When you give central banks the power to define what money is, they create inflatable paper backed by nothing. Paper money used to be redeemable for "x" amount of gold. $35 for 1oz gold for example. Then that was removed in 1971.
English
0
0
0
19
Akunjee 🖋
Akunjee 🖋@mohammedakunjee·
‘Do you know how hard you have to abuse a mammal for them not to have children?’ (re humanbeings)
English
807
8K
42.8K
1.2M
TimeEnergy Traveller
TimeEnergy Traveller@fixingmoneybtc·
@Wilki_Adam @LukeDashjr @tanpukunokami Real costs are less. We gain about 3.5% more efficiency in farming year over year. It gets more expensive because the governments print at minimum 7% per year more money or far more in poorly run countries. The theft is unfathomable
English
1
0
0
24
Lyn Alden
Lyn Alden@LynAldenContact·
@scottlincicome The “canary in the coal mine” for domestic robots is the roomba-equivalent. They’ve existed for a quarter century, but robot vacuum cleaners still haven’t taken off.
English
55
2
248
22.7K
Jordan Walker
Jordan Walker@JayW132·
Since 1970 the British pound has lost 95% of its purchasing power. Nobody announced it. Nobody apologised for it. It just happened. Most people don't even know.
Jordan Walker tweet media
English
130
543
1.9K
74.5K
TimeEnergy Traveller
TimeEnergy Traveller@fixingmoneybtc·
@Wilki_Adam @LukeDashjr @tanpukunokami Depending upon the country, most people's expectations are much higher than they were-in previous generations. Even myself, who was not poor had one phone for the household. Now families have multiple smart phones, and so much more. Yes it's expensive but many aren't balanced
English
1
0
0
56
Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu
Contemptible abuse of police power. Why kick him in the head several times when he’s already tasered & in your control? Should he not be alive to be brought to justice in a court of law for stabbing 2 Jews??!! Disgusting.
English
9.6K
703
2.9K
2.3M
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
Zac ran one of the most racist campaigns - at that time - this country has ever seen. Hate against both Jewish and Muslim people is on the rise - and we work best when we stand in solidarity with each other. Both Antisemitism and Islamophobia are both unacceptable.
Zac Goldsmith@ZacGoldsmith

Zack Polanski’s ‘Green’ Party is one of the greatest threats to Jewish people in the UK. He has offered up his Jewishness as a tool for mass laundering of antisemitism. He’s done so not because he is antisemitic, but because he is an opportunist and is tapping into a large and growing market

English
778
1.7K
10.4K
474.9K
Yvette Cooper
Yvette Cooper@YvetteCooperMP·
My thoughts are with the two men seriously injured in the appalling antisemitic attack in north London. The Jewish community in Britain must be able to live in safety and free from fear. I want to thank Shomrim, Hatzola and the police for their swift response.
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer

The antisemitic attack in Golders Green is utterly appalling. Attacks on our Jewish community are attacks on Britain. Thank you to Shomrim, Hatzola and the police for acting swiftly. Those responsible will be brought to justice.

English
1.3K
85
446
97.8K