notice me, omar
1.1K posts

notice me, omar
@WilleAndHisSong
math teacher and professional edmarie. Here for: YR, Omar Rudberg, my bae Edvin Ryding, and Education related stuff. Fluent in 3 languages. 30-something.


i just found out my American friend doesn't know what hotdog sauce is. It literally has an american flag on the bottle of hotdog sauces wdym they don't have it and never heard of it? Germany just made that shit up!???😭😭 HUHHH













Americans 🇺🇸 Did you know Hershey’s chocolate tastes like vomit to Europeans? This is not a joke. The reason? Butyric acid. Hershey’s uses a special milk process (lipolysis) that breaks down fats & creates butyric acid, the same compound found in vomit, rancid butter, and parmesan. It gives that signature tangy/sour note Americans grew up loving, but hits Europeans like a punch in the gut. Cultural chocolate trauma is real 😂 I have tried to eat a couple of Hershey chocolate bars over the years, I can’t get past the first bite.




Hot fucking take: Forcing birth just to dump a baby into adoption is way more unethical than having an abortion.








I'm apologizing in advance for the person i'll become when trump dies.




What if the “Cry It Out” sleep training (aka extinction-based sleep training) has contributed to mental health issues in young people? In some ways, it’s the most insane thing to do to a child (and is based on incredibly poor science). For centuries, families co-slept without issues, but in modern times, it has become increasingly taboo… why? How can repeated emotional non-response to a baby be healthy? What does it do to their stress calibration, attachment expectations, and self-regulation? How does it play out in their long term relationships and social connections? I’ve read the studies and they are poorly designed and weakly supported. Yet, we have an entire generation of parents that blindly follow this insane protocol without reviewing the data themselves. To be fair, the data supporting co-sleeping is weak as well, but it has centuries of precedent so I feel much more comfortable supporting that than a new approach that was largely instituted since the 1920s. For some context, in the 20th century, behaviorist John Watson (1928), interested in making psychology a hard science, took up the crusade against affection as president of the American Psychological Association. He applied the paradigm of behaviorism to childrearing, warning about the dangers of “too much mother love”. The 20th century was the time when “science" was assumed to know better than mothers, grandmothers, and families about how to raise a child. Too much kindness to a baby would result in a whiney, dependent, failed human being. A government pamphlet from the time recommended that "mothering meant holding the baby quietly, in tranquility-inducing positions" and that "the mother should stop immediately if her arms feel tired" because "the baby is never to inconvenience the adult." A baby older than six months "should be taught to sit silently in the crib; otherwise, he might need to be constantly watched and entertained by the mother, a serious waste of time." The truth is the opposite. We now know that ignoring a child raising cortisol levels and hurts trust and attachment. Yet, every young parent I know today has been brainwashed to let their child cry in silence. It’s truly wild.
















