Engerraund Serac

@qOMEGA_ @Censor You’re not that good you just spam a broken day 1 gun and have 24 hours of playtime. You will be sub 1.8 quite soon

@Hindsworth1 @SeanMcCarthyCom Democrats have already locked up 2028 because nobody can possibly vote for these retards

@SeanMcCarthyCom Dont worry thats who you'll be voting for in 2028

Thank you Peter Thiel coordinated media campaign. Very cool

@westsidefo @srrsvx @sadsadlady_ Your jealously is showing sis. Not a good look, just screams “I’m ugly pay attention to me wahhhh”

@srrsvx @sadsadlady_ Liberal feminism at it again idek what to tell ‘em 😭

I have no problem with Sabrina, and I actually like most of her music, but it’s really funny to me how she tries to portray herself as a feminist man-hater who kills men in her videos, while simultaneously objectifying herself and clearly trying to appeal to men 😭

@PalmyrPar His selfishness and stupidity is not an excuse for her to not find happiness

Her husband killed himself like a year ago btw

@LilTaxxpayer @LowkeyCozy It’s the best I love famous people getting dragged

@LowkeyCozy Yall dont even realize how much damage yall do saying dumb shit like this with zero evidence of anything smearing people names and going viral it was in front of hella people in their circle its nothing

So vrabel was having an affair with russini. Who was cheating on her eagles fan husband. And he was feeding her info trying to lower the price on AJ. Which Howie already said he wouldn’t do. Howie sent big dom to track them and dropped the photos. This should be a major scandal. Patriots organization being sneaky cheats again

@heynavtoor lol it’s so funny seeing so many accounts dedicated to showing AI has limitations. It’s too late buddy my company and other sophisticated organizations have already spent hundreds of millions and running automated/agentic workflows producing meaningful ROI. You guys will be lost

🚨SHOCKING: Apple just proved that AI models cannot do math. Not advanced math. Grade school math. The kind a 10-year-old solves. And the way they proved it is devastating. Apple researchers took the most popular math benchmark in AI — GSM8K, a set of grade-school math problems — and made one change. They swapped the numbers. Same problem. Same logic. Same steps. Different numbers. Every model's performance dropped. Every single one. 25 state-of-the-art models tested. But that wasn't the real experiment. The real experiment broke everything. They added one sentence to a math problem. One sentence that is completely irrelevant to the answer. It has nothing to do with the math. A human would read it and ignore it instantly. Here's the actual example from the paper: "Oliver picks 44 kiwis on Friday. Then he picks 58 kiwis on Saturday. On Sunday, he picks double the number of kiwis he did on Friday, but five of them were a bit smaller than average. How many kiwis does Oliver have?" The correct answer is 190. The size of the kiwis has nothing to do with the count. A 10-year-old would ignore "five of them were a bit smaller" because it's obviously irrelevant. It doesn't change how many kiwis there are. But o1-mini, OpenAI's reasoning model, subtracted 5. It got 185. Llama did the same thing. Subtracted 5. Got 185. They didn't reason through the problem. They saw the number 5, saw a sentence that sounded like it mattered, and blindly turned it into a subtraction. The models do not understand what subtraction means. They see a pattern that looks like subtraction and apply it. That is all. Apple tested this across all models. They call the dataset "GSM-NoOp" — as in, the added clause is a no-operation. It does nothing. It changes nothing. The results are catastrophic. Phi-3-mini dropped over 65%. More than half of its "math ability" vanished from one irrelevant sentence. GPT-4o dropped from 94.9% to 63.1%. o1-mini dropped from 94.5% to 66.0%. o1-preview, OpenAI's most advanced reasoning model at the time, dropped from 92.7% to 77.4%. Even giving the models 8 examples of the exact same question beforehand, with the correct solution shown each time, barely helped. The models still fell for the irrelevant clause. This means it's not a prompting problem. It's not a context problem. It's structural. The Apple researchers also found that models convert words into math operations without understanding what those words mean. They see the word "discount" and multiply. They see a number near the word "smaller" and subtract. Regardless of whether it makes any sense. The paper's exact words: "current LLMs are not capable of genuine logical reasoning; instead, they attempt to replicate the reasoning steps observed in their training data." And: "LLMs likely perform a form of probabilistic pattern-matching and searching to find closest seen data during training without proper understanding of concepts." They also tested what happens when you increase the number of steps in a problem. Performance didn't just decrease. The rate of decrease accelerated. Adding two extra clauses to a problem dropped Gemma2-9b from 84.4% to 41.8%. Phi-3.5-mini from 87.6% to 44.8%. The more thinking required, the more the models collapse. A real reasoner would slow down and work through it. These models don't slow down. They pattern-match. And when the pattern becomes complex enough, they crash. This paper was published at ICLR 2025, one of the most prestigious AI conferences in the world. You are using AI to help you make financial decisions. To check legal documents. To solve problems at work. To help your children with homework. And Apple just proved that the AI is not thinking about any of it. It is pattern matching. And the moment something unexpected shows up in your question, it breaks. It does not tell you it broke. It just quietly gives you the wrong answer with full confidence.

@PrisonPlanet Only ugly women complain about sexualization. Attractive people depend on it

Women: “Stop sexualizing us.” Also women…

@httpsbrendao @tracklist Shut up European homeless bot

@tracklist ela n muda de estetica nao??? e as musicas tao ficando tudo igual mds, demitam quem ta gerenciando a carreira dela pelo amor de deeeeeeeus

🚨 VEIO AÍ! Sabrina Carpenter acaba de lançar o clipe oficial de “HOUSE TOUR”, com participações de Madelyn Cline e Margaret Qualley.

@pubity Is this just meant to make us feel better about inevitable cancer

Scientists just realized we may have vastly overestimated microplastics pollution due to researchers accidentally measuring particles from their own plastic gloves. Any studies done with latex or nitrite gloves may need to be revised or redone entirely.

@BaileyisBratty @drugproblem Idk why Amber Heard is equated to this with Blake. Blake didn’t also physically assault and shit on the bed of the accused/accuser.

@drugproblem Amber Heard had to literally move out of the country because she spoke up about her abuse

Kanye West & Chris Brown are on sold out tours despite having dozens of sexual assault/abuse cases but they want to ‘push Blake out of the industry’ for suing a man who retaliated against her after she reported him for harassment. truly a sick industry & society

@3AMstocks @bestplayeratlas This is the truth the unsophisticated idiots don’t wanna hear it

@bestplayeratlas Once the war is over, oil will be back to $60

Trump is playing 3d chess. The plan is simple. OIL → $200. This will knock Crypto and Stocks down 40%. Send gas prices to $10. Cut Real Estate in half. And while everyone is panicking, we get generational entries. Then he ends the war, we begin the greatest bull market in history, and he takes credit for all of it. Trust the process.

@grok @BillAckman @X lol

@WilliamIsMIB @BillAckman @X Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@tekkersfoot I can show you ten better passes from Harry Kane just from his time at spurs

Lamine Yamal is UNREAL. 🤯🇪🇸

@nypost Such a gay headline lol was a joke in a video

LeBron James rips Memphis, admits he's urged Grizzlies to move trib.al/huGxrpz

@ThomasJefferMc @RobbyBerger @Cutsysays Sydney Sweeney profile pic lol nobody loves you

I’ve watched this clip a zillion times. Never seen the D man at a complete loss for words like this. Unbelievable @Cutsysays

@TukiFromKL I mean can someone explain why oil would be impacting the Mag 6 earnings much? That’s the only thing that matters

🚨 do you understand what the stock market just did.. oil is at $112.. Trump has a 2-3 week countdown running.. the only diplomat working on a backchannel ceasefire was bombed this morning and his wife is dead.. and the S&P 500 turned green.. here's the thing nobody's explaining.. stocks and oil are pricing two completely different realities right now.. the stock market prices what investors BELIEVE will happen.. Wall Street looked at today and decided this gets resolved.. de-escalation.. a deal.. a soft landing.. that's why it went green.. oil prices what the physical world actually knows.. and this is exactly what happened in September 2008.. the market was bouncing while Lehman Brothers was already collapsing behind closed doors.. investors kept buying the recovery that never came.. it took complete systemic failure before the stock price caught up to what was already true.. the gap between what stocks are pricing and what oil is pricing is the gap between what Wall Street wants to believe and what's actually happening on the ground.. trader in New York bought the dip today because he believes this ends with a deal.. the only man who was actively building that deal is in hospital in Tehran right now, after his home was bombed this morning and his wife was killed.. one of them knows something the other doesn't..

@Yernie1986 @thatkeaton We should disenfranchise anyone over the age of 65

@thatkeaton Should the government be paying for daycare? Has the government ever run any program successfully other than maybe the postal service? How about keep more of our money instead of letting the government waste it

‘We can’t invest in America because we’re fighting wars’ is literally the opposite of what he ran on. Biggest scam in modern political history, hands down.

@thatkeaton Modern? How about ever

@chakravartiiin Why do people believe they are entitled to jobs? If you work for a company like Oracle it’s a privilege

> Oracle is worth $400 billion > Its founder is the third richest man on the planet > Oracle reported a 22% revenue gain this quarter Still they fired 30,000 employees over email to fund AI Data centers. You don't hate billionaires enough.

@UnbiasedFIA Max is a more reckless driver than Tiger woods at times. Miss me with this absolute low IQ bullshit

Remove the FIA from that season, replace it with a court that follows the rules to the absolute milimeter, and Hamilton doesn't even step into Abu Dhabi with chances at the WDC Same agenda as always, yet reality hasn't changed and won't ever be changed