WinnΞng

Positioned in $SPCX on ETH.
 SpaceX ticker reveal soon. Hold and Win. 0xa17f383786Cf2241AffE41B130d8C373fDb34574

@haze0x GMGN Launchpad on ETH

🥳

@TrenchToday01 Klassic coded

Keep the meme culture Loyalty over extraction Anti-PVP Stay together Shared belief In community we trust Create classics trench.today

@cz_binance Need a sign book

Finally arrived, Freedom of Money. Hard copies.

$SPCX might be the most undervalued token to bid on ETH, once the ticker is confirmed, massive pump will come

@smokey0x $SPCX is the play

Asteroid / Spcx barbell

0xa17f383786Cf2241AffE41B130d8C373fDb34574 Bought $SPCX on ETH @SpaceX IPO soon in June and mascot $asteroid pump to 150M $SPCX the ticker of @SpaceX will shill by @elonmusk soon

@VitalikButerin @raulvk moonkin

Copyleft can serve as a form of strong self-commitment: preventing *your future self* from saying "future versions are now going to being closed" (without paying the cost of a full rewrite, which has to be highly convincing and probably even then has some legal risk because the presumption will be that it's a derivative work of the previous thing)

serious question: do (A)GPL licenses still make sense in the age of agentic/vibe coding? the point of copyleft licenses is: if you use my code, you have to open-source yours too. it encourages contributing back and spreading openness, instead of leeching and turning something proprietary. in the past, when a company opted to copy without honouring, they'd have to go to great lengths to ensure clean-room implementations. this severely narrowed the pool of companies willing to risk it. but today, you can just point an LLM at a copyleft codebase, have it reverse engineer its behaviour into a neutral spec, and then have another one implement it from scratch. the main barrier to copying without GPL obligations is gone. IMO, the only place where the moat remains is large, complex codebases (a) embedding decades of battle-tested knowledge that (b) run in mission-critical scenarios, e.g. Linux, MySQL, Git, etc. for smaller ones, copyleft won't stop people from just reimplementing their way out of the obligation. the whole OSS licensing model was built for a world where code was expensive to write. we're rapidly leaving that world. we're starting to see the effects with "vibeforks", OSS companies going back to closed source, etc. i wonder what comes next, and how it connects more broadly with the era of personal, on-demand software.

@_RichardTeng @TheBlockCo Wow

Was asked during my chat with @TheBlockCo about the painting behind me. I didn't know it would generate such interest. 😂 It was a heartwarming farewell gift from my colleagues at ADGM: a painting of me in a kandura in front of the ADGM building. A lovely reminder that the UAE has been home for me for many years - and still is today.

@0xDeployer @tn100x @stranger4599 You should buy some $TN100X 👀

@tn100x @stranger4599 lol

No words needed

@four_meme_Fora @cz_binance 坚持

@basedbot Huge 🫡

BasedBot Terminal is LIVE ⚡️ The fastest way to trade on-chain, now with a full terminal experience. Charts, limit orders & wallet/X tracker. 15 chains. All in one place. Built to be fast. Start NOW → basedbot.app

@VitalikButerin ETHCHAN

This is the new EF Mandate. For many of you, the contents should be no surprise, and a clarification along the lines that we have been going and thinking for the past few months. But the clarification is nevertheless worth making. Ethereum is a unique object and has a unique role in the world. Its role is to be a sanctuary technology, to preserve technological self-sovereignty, to enable cooperation without coercion, domination or rugpulling, and to provide an escape hatch, to ensure that no single person, organization or ideology's victory in cyberspace can be total. The Ethereum Foundation is a steward of Ethereum - the original steward, and today, the steward specifically dedicated to preserving and expanding the above aspects of Ethereum. This means a heavy emphasis on CROPS (censorship and capture resistance, open source, privacy, security), both at the protocol layer, and at the access layer, user-facing applications and tools that we create or contribute to. There are things that we do in Ethereum because we believe that they are valuable for the underlying goals that we have for Ethereum. There are things that we do not do because from the perspective of our values we find them uninteresting (or worse, harmful). But there are also things that we do not do because while they are useful, they are not our role. At the Ethereum protocol layer, we focus on decentralization, verifiability, inclusion guarantees, protocol liveness, security and privacy first and foremost. We also value capabilities (eg. L1 scale, account abstraction, perhaps some forms of in-protocol aggregation), particularly because improvements in these capabilities better enable users to properly benefit from Ethereum's CROPS properties and displace the need for higher-layer intermediaries that might weaken the extent to which Ethereum's properties carry over into the full stack. We also believe that the Ethereum protocol must strive to pass the walkaway test. "We do X to specialize to serve the use cases of today, if more use cases appear later, we will continue to keep adding more EIPs for them later" is logic fit for many other blockchains whose names you hear often on this forum, but we do not believe it is logic fit for a decentralization-first blockchain like Ethereum. At the application layer, we focus on making "the zero option" - user experience that goes hard on ensuring security and privacy, avoiding dependence on intermediaries, and respecting the user's agency - as high quality as possible. We see this as complementary to work in the Ethereum ecosystem that "goes broad", starting from the world that it exists, and brings it onchain and improves its properties over time. Such work has its natural home outside the EF. We intend to be supportive of such efforts. We believe that the two are complementary: tools that are developed within the EF can be adopted by anyone, including partially, and even partial adoption that improves people's security, privacy and agency is a good thing. But the form of user experience that is more heavily insistent on CROPS properties is where we want the EF to develop its center of expertise. This does not mean shrinking from the hard questions. We believe in a vision of self-sovereignty that protects users, and does not leave users in the cold to face environments where they lose their life savings if they make a mistake, and click "yes" on a confirmation screen by accident two seconds after. But such protection must be designed based on a philosophical baseline of empowering the user, not empowering centralized organizations that claim to act in the user's name. This quadrant of design space - caring about users' (including non-experts') well-being and safety, and yet insistent on doing this in a way compatible with their agency and freedom, is underserved (not just in crypto, but in the world). We wish to use Ethereum as a platform to build out and showcase this quadrant, and ideally work with others to expand its reach over time. This is also a new chapter in how we see our position in the world. We must see ourselves not just as the Ethereum community, but also as maintainers of the Ethereum tool within what you might call the CROPS community or the sanctuary tech community, or a dozen of other words that have for a long time been used by people with similar values to us but far outside Ethereum. This means open-mindedness to new conceptions of what things in the world are our natural allies. Ethereum is not the world. Ethereum is a specific object in the world that is here to have specific properties. The Ethereum Foundation is a specific organization within Ethereum - one steward, not the sole one. I encourage all to read the mandate in detail; it includes concrete examples of how we intend to deal with the challenges and nuances of these ideas. We are doubling down on Ethereum and are excited about its next chapter.

@cz_binance @BroLeon 可以换头像了

@BroLeon 他们也不看看大饼都跌成啥样了？富个鸟啊？🤣

《从福布斯富豪榜看财富流动趋势》 今天关于 @cz_binance 被杀猪榜放进前20的消息又满天飞了，按之前的调性大概率等CZ睡醒又要开始辟谣，哈哈。 不想露富是华人常见心态，但从我等吃瓜群众看，作为Crypto唯一杀入前列的代表，还是乐得看到CZ给Crypto挣了脸的。 顺便分析了一下这次的富豪榜比例情况： ▶️科技（互联网 / AI / 软件 / 芯片）约35–40% 代表：Elon Musk、Jeff Bezos、Mark Zuckerberg ▶️金融与投资 约15–20% 代表：Warren Buffett、对冲基金、PE ▶️零售 / 奢侈品 / 消费 约10–15% ▶️制造 / 工业 约10% ▶️重工业、汽车、制造 能源 / 矿业 约5–8% ▶️石油、天然气 房地产 约5–7% 可以看出财富结构正在发生代际变化，世界在不知不觉间已经通过财富流向告诉大家是如何变迁的。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 我摘出几个有意思的地方： 1、AI正在成为新的财富发动机。 榜单前列里很多财富增长都来自 AI 或 AI相关科技公司，Musk，Larry Page，老黄等人财富增长很大程度来自 AI浪潮带动的科技股上涨。例如 Alphabet 股价上涨直接推动 Page 和 Brin 财富大幅增加。 过去十年最赚钱的是移动互联网，未来十年最赚钱的可能是AI基础设施。 2、超级富豪财富增长速度极端惊人 榜单还有一个很震撼的数据： 全球亿万富豪数量已经超过 3400人，总财富达到 约20万亿美元，而且仍在持续增长。 更夸张的是： 全球最富的10个人一年财富增加接近6000亿美元。 财富向极少数人快速集中的速度进一步加快了，科幻小说里一个人掌握全球99%财富的故事好像真有可能发生？ 3、财富结构正在发生代际变化 老钱逐渐被科技钱取代，比如奢侈品巨头Bernard Arnault 逐渐被科技创始人压制。现在的超级富豪基本都是科技公司创始人or控制人，平台型企业掌控者 而不是传统的：地产 石油 制造业 4、超级富豪“百亿俱乐部”正在爆炸增长 centibillionaire（千亿美元富豪）数量暴增。全球已经有 18位财富超过1000亿美元的人，这个群体的总财富接近 3.6万亿美元 这在十年前几乎是不可想象的。 很多机构都预测全球第一位 trillionaire（万亿富豪）可能在2030年前出现。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~` 此外，国人比较熟悉和感兴趣的富豪情况： 1、卖水的赢了搞互联网的，首富还是“水王” 钟睒睒（农夫山泉）依然稳坐中国首富。在全球互联网寒冬和电商内卷下，水王靠着刚需和极致的现金流控制力，依然压过张一鸣和马化腾。 2、老黄代表华人之光席卷全球 随着AI浪潮，英伟达（Nvidia）CEO黄仁勋身价疯涨，目前已进入全球前10（甚至前8）。对于中文读者来说，他是全球科技圈最受瞩目的华人面孔，也是AI时代的绝对教父。 3、“出海三杰”的进击：赚全球的钱 张一鸣（TikTok）、黄峥（拼多多/Temu）、许仰天（Shein）。这三位是典型的“中国供应链+全球化运营”的赢家，反映了中国互联网出海的强大生命力。 4、房地产时代的终结，新能源/半导体的崛起 曾经榜单前列的王健林、杨惠妍等地产巨头排名大幅缩水甚至掉队。取而代之的是雷军（小米造车成功）、曾毓群（宁德时代）。 资源型财富已经被科技型财富压过去了。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 说回Crypto，CZ 的财富变化，本质上是整个加密市场周期的一个晴雨表。 Forbes 在计算 CZ 财富时主要参考是Binance股权估值，而非 $BNB 币价和其他链上资产。 现在已经是加密熊市， $BNB 价格从顶峰已经跌落50%，但CZ的身家反而上涨。我问了一下AI，这可能与熊市了反而头部交易所的市场份额会上升有关。 在2018熊市、2022熊市、现在这个阶段，Binance 的市场份额反而往往会上升，因为原因很简单：熊市会淘汰很多熬不下去的平台。头部交易所反而会趁机吸收流动性用户，进而提高了市场份额。 表单上其实还有其他Crypto富豪，比如 Coinbase的 @brian_armstrong (100-130亿，大约200名）， @saylor 老爷子（70-100亿美元，大约300-400名区间）。 但Forbes评估时候不看链上财富，所以Crypto富豪的资产往往是被低估的。 希望未来有更多加密富豪上榜吧，给咱们行业也长长脸。 最后附上福布斯榜单原链接，感兴趣的可以自己再去挖掘一下： forbes.com/billionaires/

@LucaNetz @TryAmigoApp 9K9PLS DXD8GR DQ9GZK QEZ60J OLLTLU

Amigo is what Friend Tech could’ve been. Great work from the @TryAmigoApp team. App is 🔥

@TryAmigoApp 9K9PLS DXD8GR DQ9GZK QEZ60J OLLTLU

Creators are now live on Amigo. Get rewarded for discovering founders, musicians, athletes, influencers, and rising talent early. Back your creator now.

@star_okx Ok 虾 using onchain OS

Three entry points, one ecosystem: AI skills, MCP, and open APIs. Build once, deploy across chains.

@binji_x Bullish

DeFiPunk is an emergent set of values rooted in crypto’s early ideals, that prioritizes user control over short-term convenience. It assumes financial systems work better when authority defaults to users and code instead of with intermediaries and discretionary trust. But let’s clarify: this is not anti-institutional, in fact, it may even be the opposite. Systems built this way are more auditable, more resilient, easier to integrate, and harder to break. For large institutions, DeFiPunk translates into infrastructure that reduces counterparty risk, lowers coordination costs, and makes rules explicit instead of implicit. DeFiPunk means less reliance on reputation and more reliance on verifiable execution. There are builders committed to pushing this forward, @z0r0zzz is one of them.

@z_fi_ $zorg is the most undervalued project on ETH

$NOX @virtuals_io just follow @nox_virtuals Something big is coming 👀