
Lauren
3.8K posts







There’s a conversation going on in the Christian community right now about pornography in which women are being blamed for destroying marriage because they don’t want husbands who consume porn. This article does its level best to shame women up one side and down the other for feeling this way, with references to “female levels of sexual purity” to which men cannot reasonably be expected to hold, and truly astonishing hints that women who refuse to date porn users will be responsible for a “degenerate” future of gooners and OF models. Let that sink in for a second or two. It’s not the porn-addicted men who are to blame for gooners and the sex industry, Christians are being told, it’s the women who won’t differentiate between porn addicts and “good men who struggle with pornography.” Jesus was very clear on this subject, as he tended to be: "But I say unto you that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” Somehow I don’t think he’d be very impressed with these “good men.” For two thousand years, Christians have fought to elevate man above his baser instincts. Now Christian leadership has decided to surrender, because maintaining relevance and keeping people in pews is more important than maintaining Christian morals — and they’re attacking the women who won’t play ball. firstthings.com/repentance-and…












Governor Ayotte’s veto of SB 552 is a profound disappointment to the women and girls of New Hampshire. As a girls’ gymnastics coach, athlete and NH State Chapter Leader for The Independent Women's Network and advocate for single-sex spaces, I expected more from our first female governor. This was her moment to lead New England—to become the first governor in the region to affirm the basic truth that biological sex matters in locker rooms, restrooms, sports, and prisons. Instead, she chose the path of least resistance. Her veto statement rings hollow: she claims she’s been asking for a “thoughtful, narrow way” while protecting the privacy, safety, and rights of all Granite Staters. Yet SB 552 is that measured approach. It simply permits distinctions based on biological sex in limited, high-stakes settings where privacy and fairness are on the line. The science is clear, the concerns are widespread, and the public supports it. Repeatedly vetoing common-sense protections while offering no meaningful alternative isn’t thoughtful leadership—it’s kicking the can down the road and leaving girls exposed. New Hampshire’s motto is “Live Free or Die.” Women and girls cannot live free when their most intimate spaces and hard-earned opportunities are compromised. Governor Ayotte had the chance to show real courage and integrity by standing with the vast majority of Granite Staters who understand that biological reality is not bigotry. Instead, her veto echoes the same weak excuses we’ve heard before. This is not protection for “all.” It is a failure to protect half. We are deeply disappointed, and we will not stop fighting for the privacy, dignity, and fairness our daughters deserve. New Hampshire women and girls are watching—and we deserve better. We will bring this forward again until courage prevails. @KellyAyotte @IWN @IWV @IWF @WDI_USA @LisaMazurNH @NewHampJournal @GrahamAllen @GraniteGrok @GraniteDiscours @CCRCNH @Citizensdogeusa @SenScottBrown @ScottPresler @xx_xyathletics @JenniferSey @Sidewalk_Steve @BethRS62 @bourne_beth2345 @NHGOP @NHGOPWOMEN @NHGOPCaucus

She borrowed $49,548.74 in student loans. 120 payments later, she’s paid $25,558 — and now owes $50,121. She’s paid on it for years and still owes more than what she originally borrowed. The entire thing is a SCAM to enslave the young people.

@JustMisogyny project 1955

Male rapists and murderers who say they are women are being housed with women, masturbating in front of them, and threatening to rape and kill them in state prisons in Minnesota, New York, California, and Washington state, and federal prisons in Florida and Texas. It's a violation of the Eighth Amendment, it's a violation of the Geneva Conventions, it's a human rights abuse, it's a state-sanctioned abuse of women, all of it founded on an absurd lie that a man becomes a woman when he says that he is a woman. The same is happening in Canada and across the UK. Affirming transgenderism requires inflicting absurdities and cruelties on women and children. Affirming transgenderism requires corrupting the language and corrupting medicine and corrupting the law. These aren't difficult questions once you understand the basic lie at the foundation of it. Any judge should be able to uproot and dismantle it. That none have yet is an index of a derangement afflicting the educated classes of the Western world. One Scottish judge got it right. Now others must do likewise.









