Bill of Wrights

To all the blue checks: If you continuously push others away because you keep responding with a massive wall of words, it doesn't mean you won the debates. All it means is that you're an annoying windbag who doesn't know how to keep things brief.

@TAFKAB2 @FB_viktor Thanks for the tip 🙂

@WrightStuff1969 @FB_viktor Fuck me you need to get on that like fkin immediately. Binge the fuck outta this guy bro. Hell isn't at all what its been advertised to be lmao. My advice sub and get the cheat sheet. Its like easy mode for debunking xtianity.

The freedom and peace of mind that comes with deconstructing religion>>>> Hell, heaven, dem0ns, S@tan 🚮

@TAFKAB2 @FB_viktor I'm not familiar with it.

@WrightStuff1969 @FB_viktor Do you watch DZone man?

@SurePlug27046 @D_Preacher_1 You are cocky, aren't you? The future doesn't care about your Bible.

Russia, China, North Korea etc just name them. None, I mean none can take over from US. They have all what it takes, but they don't have the time to act, it's already over. The only part remaining is for the UN to become as powerful as never before. The world won't see it coming, but UN will soon become the centre of world government. How do I know? The Bible said it. You don't believe it,but Bible does not care about your feelings.

Serious question; If God is silent today, what makes you sure He spoke clearly thousands of years ago?

@SurePlug27046 @D_Preacher_1 Watch out for China.

I was not there, but I know no human can predict the future accurately, it has to someone higher than human. Let me tell you this, Bible said the 7th kingdom would be the last human world power. The 7th is Anglo America. If any other government shall take over from them, except God's kingdom, then I'll stop to believe the Bible. It'll happen, whether you believe it or not. This is not a meme.

@DearS_o_n One caveat: Not all mistakes are created equal. Some prisoners will spend the rest of their lives locked up because of mistakes they made when they were young. Some people have to live with the fact that someone else is dead because they chose to drink and drive. Just be careful.

WHAT THE F*CK ARE YOU AFRAID OF - Death : We’re all gonna die. - Bankruptcy : You can make it all back. - Shame : Everyone will forget in a week. - Rejection : It happens to everyone. - Failure : It’s part of the path. - Judgment : They’ll judge anyway. - Losing people : Not all are meant to stay. - Making mistakes : You’ll survive them. - Taking risks : Regret hurts more. Live every day like it's your last day.♟️

100%

@PassGospelTract @TheSkepticWiz Translation: If you buy into what I'm saying, you're right. If you don't, there's something wrong with you. Every other religion and cult has a similar message.

@TheSkepticWiz 1 Corinthians 2:14 King James Version "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."

The god of the Bible is an asshole. I'd say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

@DasherCindy @TheSkepticWiz Or delusion.

@WrightStuff1969 @TheSkepticWiz Today, we call it schizophrenia.

@bluegeorgia "I'm on Truth Social, that's the only social media I do." There's the problem.

CPAC attendee: He is the president of peace. When this gets taken care of, it's going to be peace. I'm on Truth Social, that's the only social media I do... he's got a plan. He's a genius. And we trust President Trump.

@kvngblinkz @Thabelo_Ngwenya @SeanD174 @AtasEdmund31044 David killed a man to sleep with his wife. Maybe he should've understood how losing his balls feels.

@Thabelo_Ngwenya @SeanD174 @AtasEdmund31044 😂😂😂so he can understand how losing child feels

David k!lled a man and took his wife,then cried to god for forgiveness and god forgave him. If God alone could forgive sins, Why did Jesus have die?🤔

@TheSkepticWiz Theists understand this, but only when it refers to other gods and religions.

@SBozzled @McClureShawn Blocked. Go annoy someone else.

All I see throughout your posts is mocking of christians. Why? What is you reasoning? Does it have to do with the fact that 86% of sexual abuse was done on young boys? You do understand that meant that homosexuals were the biggest culprits of sexual abuse in churches. And it was this tiny minority of gay individuals that corrupted the church. The church and the 98% of persons that went to the churches for peace were not at fault, homosexuals had infiltrated the churches and abused the young.

That theists often pivot so quickly to "Yeah, but morality!" in debates about God shows that a main crutch supporting their faith is anxiety about how morality can exist in a world without their God. I have news for them: whatever morality exists has ALWAYS existed without God.

@SBozzled @McClureShawn Take care.

YI have to Nuke you again I am afrid . just remember i am 65 and i can tell you a story of how faith save my like ( must sound like a clique to you) but it litteraly did and it opened up my understanding what faith acualy does to your subconscious mind. The Nuke you just contradicted yourself in one breath. You admit that “Christian scientists have historically played a meaningful role and made a number of advances.” Yet you immediately claim “None of that has anything to do with whether their supernatural claims are true.” That’s intellectually dishonest. Those Christian scientists didn’t stumble into their breakthroughs despite their faith — they achieved them because of their faith. They believed a rational God created a rational, law-governed universe, and that belief gave them the confidence to develop and relentlessly apply the scientific method. The very reason they could say “the scientific method is just a method anyone can use” today is because Christianity first provided the philosophical soil in which that method could grow and flourish for centuries. You’re happy to enjoy the fruit while denying the root. You can’t praise the tree’s harvest and then claim the tree had nothing to do with it. Their “supernatural claims” weren’t a side issue — they were the driving force behind the entire enterprise. What you’re missing is the world they actually lived in. In their time, superstition was everywhere, education was almost nonexistent for 95% of the population, and there was no modern scientific framework. The Bible was the most powerful, coherent, and authoritative book they had. When it said we are made in God’s image, that the universe is orderly, and that searching out God’s works is glorious, they took it literally as coming from the Creator Himself. That faith wasn’t some side hobby — it shaped their entire subconscious drive. It told them they were doing God’s work, thinking His thoughts after Him, and uncovering the hidden treasures He had deliberately placed in creation. That belief didn’t make them superstitious; it gave them extraordinary confidence and purpose in a dark and uncertain age. You judge their faith by today’s standards, but you can’t understand the power it had unless you grasp how all-consuming and motivating true belief was for them. It wasn’t blind superstition — it was the fuel that lit the fire of modern science. And at that time, in the minds of nearly the entire human population, God was not superstition — He was literal reality. When these scientists read the Bible, they believed they were hearing directly from God Himself. That’s why verses like these hit them with such power: Psalm 111:2 — “Great are the works of the Lord; they are pondered by all who delight in them.” (This was literally inscribed on the walls of the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge.) Note the word "PONDERED" = study, examine, weigh, contemplate, deliberate, Proverbs 25:2 — “It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings.” NOTE the words "To search out a matter" = to make diligent search, to inquire diligently to try the matter (old sense = to test/examine) to search out the truth / facts to ferret out a matter (implies persistent searching) to ascertain the facts of a matter to elucidate a matter (to make clear by investigation) to unravel a matter. Genesis 1:27 — “God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them.” 1 Corinthians 6:19 — “Your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you…” Job 38:31-33 (Kepler loved this — God challenges Job with scientific-style questions about the stars and laws of the heavens). 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (seen as biblical support for the scientific method):“Test all things; hold fast what is good.” These verses didn’t just motivate them personally — they shaped an entire culture that believed the universe was intelligible and worth relentless investigation because a rational, good God made it. The strongest single verse overall (and the one literally inscribed on a major science lab) is Psalm 111:2. It perfectly captures the Christian drive: "God’s works are great → therefore we should study them with delight.James Clerk Maxwell — Personally requested Psalm 111:2 carved on the Cavendish Lab doors. Johannes Kepler — Called science “thinking God’s thoughts after Him” and frequently referenced verses like Proverbs 25:2 and Job 38. Isaac Newton — Had a deep belief in the Bible and saw his work as uncovering God’s design. Robert Boyle — Often quoted verses about God’s works being worthy of study. They read these words as direct instructions from the Creator: “I made you like Me. I live in you. My creation is full of wonders I have hidden on purpose — now go search them out. That is your glory.”That is the kind of faith that doesn’t just believe — it ignites. While non-Christian civilisations made foundational early discoveries—such as China's invention of paper, gunpowder, the compass, and printing, or the Islamic Golden Age's advances in algebra, optics, medicine, and preservation of Greek knowledge—the Christian West took many of these ideas, dramatically refined and mechanised them, and generated the overwhelming majority of subsequent breakthroughs. From the Scientific Revolution onward (roughly 1500–1900), Europe and its Christian-influenced offshoots produced well over 90% of major scientific discoveries, inventions, and technological advancements in fields like mechanics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering. ***This included the development of the scientific method itself, calculus, the laws of motion and gravity, the steam engine, electricity, vaccination, and the foundations of the Industrial Revolution—innovations that multiplied the impact of earlier inventions by orders of magnitude and created the modern world. In quantitative terms, if one tallies significant scientific and technological figures or breakthroughs from 800 BC to 1900, the Christian West (primarily Europe) accounts for roughly 80–95% of the total output in the later centuries, compared to a much smaller and earlier-peaking share from China, the Islamic world, India, and other regions."*** *** Post 1900. As the science progressed sceptics like yourself in god's existence increased dramatically , but the seed that christianity had planted had grown in to a full tree with magnificent fruit and people like you forgot the roots, the soil and the seed that grew the tree. Now everyone eats from the tree of the rewards of christianity and between 1900 - 2025, Roughly 85–95%+ of all Nobel Prizes were given to (Christians ~65% by religion + Jews ~22% by ethnicity/faith leaves a small remainder for others like atheists from Christian backgrounds, Muslims, Asians, etc.) Atheists/agnostics/freethinkers: ~10.5% (much higher in Literature at ~35%). Muslims and others: under 1%. That is what you call evidence my friend 1300 years of evidence of the impact of the bible on the Scientific method. Remember the Christian and jewish faith is intertwined

@SBozzled @McClureShawn The scientific method is just that, a method that anyone can use. I agree that Christian scientists have historically played a meaningful role and made a number of advances. None of that has anything to do with whether their supernatural claims are true.

Oh bless your heart. You just proved my point perfectly while claiming I proved nothing. The scientific method didn’t magically appear in a vacuum. It grew directly out of the Christian conviction that the universe is rational, orderly, and worth investigating because it was created by a rational God who doesn’t deceive us. That worldview — unique to Christian Europe at the time — gave birth to the very idea that we should doubt, test, experiment, and seek truth systematically. Newton, Kepler, Boyle, Faraday, Maxwell, Pasteur, Mendel — the giants who built modern science — weren’t “people of all faiths and no faith.” They were overwhelmingly devout Christians who explicitly said their faith drove their science. You sitting here smugly declaring “the scientific method has nothing to do with Christianity” while using the very tools Christianity helped create is peak historical illiteracy. It’s like saying “the internet has nothing to do with electricity” because Hindus and atheists also use Wi-Fi. Your ignorance isn’t just wrong — it’s impressively confident. Thanks for the demonstration. The only way to make you understand how christianity directly created the very foundations of modern science is to go nuclear on you. if you doubt then well you can go and pretend men are women.. Broader ImpactChristianity didn’t just found individual universities — it created the entire institutional model of the university: self-governing corporations of scholars, standardized degrees (bachelor, master, doctorate), faculties (theology, law, medicine, arts), and the idea that systematic reason and inquiry could reveal truth about God’s creation. The driving belief was that a rational, orderly God made a rational, orderly universe — so studying it rigorously was an act of worship. In short: Almost every major university in Europe from the 11th to 15th centuries, and the vast majority of the earliest universities in the Americas, were founded by Christians (especially the Catholic Church) or grew directly out of Christian institutions. The scientific method and the culture of skeptical, evidence-based inquiry you value today took deep root in that Christian intellectual soil. The First Great Wave: Medieval European Universities (11th–13th centuries)These were almost all born from Christian cathedral schools or monastic traditions, often with papal charters or direct Church sponsorship: University of Bologna (Italy, ~1088) — The oldest university in continuous operation in the Western world. Started as a center for law; received papal support. University of Paris (France, ~1150, often called the Sorbonne) — One of the most influential; theology was the queen of sciences. Received charters from Pope Innocent III. University of Oxford (England, ~1167–1180s) — Grew from monastic and cathedral teaching; papal legate granted key privileges in 1214. University of Cambridge (England, 1209) — Founded when scholars fled Oxford; also received strong Church backing. University of Salamanca (Spain, ~1134, royal charter 1218) — One of the oldest in Europe; focused on theology, law, and medicine. University of Padua (Italy, 1222) — Split from Bologna; strong medical and scientific tradition under Church influence. University of Toulouse (France, 1229) — Founded with direct papal involvement. University of Naples Federico II (Italy, 1224) — Though imperial, it operated within the Christian intellectual framework. University of Coimbra (Portugal, 1290) — Papal confirmation. University of Lleida (Spain, 1300), University of Rome (La Sapienza, 1303), and many others. By the end of the Middle Ages, at least 80 universities had been founded across Europe, nearly all with Church approval, protection, or direct founding. The Pope frequently acted as their greatest protector, granting privileges and autonomy.Later Medieval & Early Modern Christian FoundationsUniversity of Prague (1348) University of Vienna (1365) University of Heidelberg (1386) University of Cologne (1388) University of Leipzig (1409) University of Leuven (Belgium, 1425) — The oldest Catholic university in the Low Countries. University of Uppsala (Sweden, 1477) University of Wittenberg (1502) — Where Martin Luther taught (Protestant Reformation context). Christianity in the Americas and BeyondHarvard University (1636) — Founded by Puritan Christians as a seminary to train clergy. Yale University (1701) — Founded by Congregationalists. Princeton University (1746) — Founded by Presbyterians. University of Pennsylvania (1740, with strong Christian roots), Brown, Dartmouth, Columbia, etc. — Nearly all early American colleges were founded by Christian denominations. University of Santo Tomas (Philippines, 1611) — Oldest in Asia, founded by the Dominican Order (Catholic). Have a nice day

@SBozzled @McClureShawn The scientific method has nothing to do with Christianity. People of all faiths and no faith make scientific contributions. You haven't proved anything.

Actually, it’s very much ‘here nor there. Most scientists today aren’t theists largely because Christianity gave the great minds of the past the intellectual tools and confidence to doubt, question, and investigate the universe in the first place. They believed a rational God created a rational, orderly universe that was worth studying. That belief produced the Scientific Revolution. You, as a proud doubter and skeptic, are actually a direct product of that Christian-shaped culture. The very freedom and framework you use to say “I don’t know, therefore no God” was made possible by centuries of Christian scientists who thought it was their God-given duty to seek truth fearlessly. So thanks for the chat — and for proving my point."

@SBozzled @McClureShawn Transgender women identify as women, and I'm OK with that. If you're not, suit yourself. Bye.

So just to be clear: When you say you support trans rights and that ‘trans women are women,’ do you mean: A) A trans woman is a woman in the exact same sense and reality as a biological female (same sex, same category), or B) A trans woman is not a biological woman, but you believe society should treat her as if she were a woman anyway?Be direct — which one is it? If it’s B, then why do you mock religious people for believing something without direct testable evidence, while you support redefining ‘woman’ without any direct testable biological evidence?”