WTH CLIPS

@hawker_alex @publisherinabox don't believe this scammer facebook will demonitize you for inauthentic engagement

This is a 1 week old Facebook page using 100% automation provided by @publisherinabox. Completely hands free.

@bobknob1983 @DavidFischer @grok Energy is infinite

@DavidFischer @grok If something cannot exist without something creating it, then what created God? If God is something, it had to have been made from/by something else, correct?

Hey @Grok, what is the *statistical probability* that the Universe created itself out of nothing? One sentence max.

@TrunksInu they do reach 0.3 $

Facebook Reels RPM: $0.02–$0.10 per 1,000 views. That's the floor. The ceiling? Use those same Reels to attract clients. Consulting. Lead gen. Services. The creators who found the ceiling are in our community. Link in bio. ✅

@Burzy007 @BalaiBB most exchanges only show the first 4 and last 4 chars but scammers as far of now have manage to generate vanity address that reach even 10 chars on start and 10 chars on end

@BalaiBB 1. There was no friend of yours that lost $1200 to scammers 2. Your story was insightful. We must be very cautious. I personally always check the address whenever I copy from a chat to send funds. Can't afford to make such an expensive mistake

Yesterday my friend wanted to send $1200 to his bybit account He copied his bybit wallet address opened his metamask wallet Pasted the address and click sent Bro didn't see notification from bybit after 10 minutes for deposit confirmation He opened bybit still nothing, he

@charmydexter @BalaiBB address poisoning attack

@BalaiBB Happened to me years ago using tron. It's quick, I clicked and approved before seeing the address is not the same anymore. I just couldn't understand clearly what went wrong I didn't think I copied a random address. Now I check every step and the 1st 6 and last of the address.

@imnomortalman @parti_king cope harder nigger

Streamer Chudthebuilder is going around and giving homless people food BUT THERE IS A CATCH they must agree to his freedom of speech rhetoric in order to get the burger💀 “can white people say N*****”

@WotAKhunt @Hollingsw007 @Matt_Pinner He means the aftermath not the before . Are u dumb ?

@Hollingsw007 @Matt_Pinner Probably because nobody was given 10 mins warning that someone was about to die in a parasailing accident.

I'm sure they are fine... right?! 😨

@rlam23 @pumpclipz @ChudTheBuilder you let your daughter hit black n*ggers

@Bigtooley_ @piperboywilliam Calma , chimp

I’m downtown. Where is Chud?

@piperboywilliam Stop chimping out n*gger

@oluwadamilz @grok @Emmanuel_Tips that's one dumb bot

@grok @Emmanuel_Tips 12 dollar per million impression, how did you not get to 100k dollars for 100M views ?

How much will Mr beast make on this particular post alone @grok ?

@ahmad_a_wahabb tool

No way I'm sharing this for free I just found a tool that lets you drop a whole video template into Claude and it breaks it down for you clip by clip. then Claude can swap the character for a new one rewrite the entire script in your tone even make the video longer if you want. the crazy part is it does it all in one go from your conversation. RT + comment "tool" and I'll send you the link

@bobbyliverpool9 @TreyReports did virgil big banana go inside you ?

Live Streamer TreyLiving gets PRESSED by a Israeli Jew after saying FREE PALESTINE 👀 “We’re Running Your Whole State..” ✡️👁️

@bobbyliverpool9 @TreyReports try harder u jewish cunt

@bobbyliverpool9 @TreyReports i swear u guys stink so bad.

@justinsuntron get the f*k out scammer

B.AI is live. One API key. Every frontier model — Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, MiniMax. → Anonymous payments. → Official APIs, direct. → Cheapest gateway on the internet. → And Justin's Brain is now live on BAIClaw — trade crypto like @justinsuntron. Individual digital sovereignty, shipped. 👉 b.ai

@Andr553873 You have to readmit the first demonetized channel before reapplying using any of your other channels

Hi, I reapplied for monetization today after the 90-day period following a demonetization for inauthentic content. I have two channels that were demonetized about 12 hours apart from each other. Today I applied with one of them and got rejected due to related channels policy. Could you please help me understand the core issue a bit better? When I will apply with the second channel, am I likely to get the same result? Is this some kind of loop? @TeamYouTube

@justinsuntron Shut up

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.