
LKC
2.9K posts




🚨 Robberies are now down 31% in California since Gavin Newsom took office.










I need to remind everyone that Kathy Nestor had Agent David Hull TESTIFY UNDER OATH that Exhibit 12.4 – the surveillance footage on UVU campus – does not allow one to specifically identify Tyler Robinson as the individual taking the shot Nestor: "The video on the roof was not distinguishable, fair?" Hull: "That video?" Nestor: "Yes." Hull: "As they stand alone, no." Hope this clears some things up regarding what is being said this evening about new clear footage.



Were we in the same courtroom? I was at the Charlie Kirk murder trial in Provo, Utah where Judge Tony Graf called for the attorney for the victim to play a video described as “high definition enhanced version of the security cameras.” Multiple new clips, zoom ins and red circle enhancements in this video. It showed clear images of Tyler Robinson’s Dodge Challenger, license plate, hubcaps, clothing, movements around campus in multiple visits as he stalked Charlie, climbing onto the rooftop, lumbering across the rooftop, laying in a prone sniper position on the Losi rooftop at 12:22 PM. Taking a shot at 12:23 PM. And fleeing the crime scene. It was so compelling the entire room gasped as the Kirk’s wept bitterly in the front row and Tyler Robinson looked at the ground. Multiple corporate media reporters in the room described the same video and scene. Did you camp out all night in your sleeping bag just to miss this critical moment? Or perhaps there’s another reason you’re not being honest…


I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of “Tyler” jumping off the roof shown in this screen shot. I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.













