Lance

MKULTRA 1953–1973 | Central Intelligence Agency 149 documented subprojects | $10–25 million (1950s dollars) What it actually was: The CIA paid doctors, psychologists, and chemists across North America to give LSD, mescaline, BZ gas, scopolamine, and dozens of other drugs to people who had no idea they were in an experiment. Subjects included: - Federal prisoners - Mental-hospital patients (some held in drug-induced comas for months) - Soldiers told they were getting “stress tests” - Bar patrons in San Francisco and New York whose drinks were spiked by CIA officers - Prostitutes’ clients in CIA safe houses (watched through two-way mirrors) Most famous site: Dr. Ewen Cameron at McGill University in Montreal. He used CIA money to put patients into insulin comas, gave them electroshock at 75× normal intensity, and played taped messages thousands of times to “erase” their memories and “rebuild” personalities. Many left permanently damaged. In 1973 CIA Director Richard Helms ordered every MKULTRA file destroyed. The only reason we know any of this is because about 20,000 pages were mis-filed in a financial archive and surfaced in 1977. Primary admissions: - 1977 Senate Select Committee hearings - CIA “Family Jewels” report, pp. 385–422 - 8,000+ surviving pages released under FOIA

Fox News stages a propaganda-for-war interview with retired Robert Harward, former Deputy Commander of U.S. Central Command. However, it’s not what he said that’s making him go viral. The world is a stage.

Ben Shapiro has placed his ENTIRE show as a YouTube ad. I wish I was joking.

Fox News stages a propaganda-for-war interview with retired Robert Harward, former Deputy Commander of U.S. Central Command. However, it’s not what he said that’s making him go viral. The world is a stage.

C. S. Lewis, the feminist. “The homemaker has the ultimate career. All other careers exist for one purpose only – and that is to support the ultimate career.” — C. S. Lewis

Silencing the Sentinels: Historical Agency Attacks on Whistleblowers and the Tools of Cover-Up Whistleblowers are not mere irritants to the powerful—they are existential threats to hidden operations, illicit profits, and carefully guarded narratives. Across decades, American intelligence agencies, military branches, and federal bureaucracies have deployed a consistent playbook to neutralize those who expose wrongdoing: character assassination, professional destruction, legal persecution, and, when necessary, more extreme measures. When direct attacks fail to silence a voice, subtler instruments take over—witness protection programs that isolate under the guise of safety, and non-disclosure agreements that bind silence through legal threat. These tactics do not occur in isolation; they form a coordinated system designed to cover tracks, protect entrenched interests, and reshape reality itself. The pattern begins early. In the 1930s, Marine Major General Smedley Butler revealed a plotted fascist coup against President Roosevelt backed by Wall Street titans. Despite partial congressional confirmation of his testimony, Butler was swiftly dismissed as paranoid and unstable by press and power brokers alike. The message was clear: label the messenger unreliable, and the message dies. By the 1970s the methods grew bolder. Daniel Ellsberg’s release of the Pentagon Papers exposed decades of deliberate deception about the Vietnam War. The Nixon administration responded by burglarizing his psychiatrist’s office to steal medical records, branding him the “most dangerous man in America,” and indicting him on espionage charges carrying over 100 years in prison. Charges were eventually dismissed due to government misconduct, but the intent was unmistakable: ruin the individual to bury the truth. Around the same time, Martha Mitchell, whose insider accounts helped unravel Watergate, was publicly portrayed as mentally ill and alcoholic until her warnings were proven accurate. The 1980s and 1990s brought professional annihilation and suspicious deaths. FBI forensic expert Frederic Whitehurst exposed systemic fraud in the crime lab that tainted major cases, including the Oklahoma City bombing investigation. The Bureau isolated him, stripped his duties, and forced his resignation—only settling for millions years later after outside probes vindicated him. Karen Silkwood, en route to deliver evidence of safety violations at a nuclear facility, died in a single-car crash under circumstances that remain contested to this day. The post-9/11 era weaponized surveillance and secrecy on an industrial scale. NSA analysts Thomas Drake and William Binney revealed unconstitutional mass surveillance programs that violated the Fourth Amendment. Both endured home raids, career destruction, and indictments that collapsed only after public exposure. CIA officer John Kiriakou, who confirmed the agency’s use of waterboarding, spent nearly two years in prison. Pentagon contracting overseer Bunnatine Greenhouse was demoted after challenging no-bid Halliburton deals in Iraq. The pattern repeated: raid, indict, bankrupt, and discredit. Today the tactics are more refined but no less ruthless. In recent years, hundreds of federal employees—from DHS agents exposing security failures to VA staff reporting patient harm—have faced suspension, firearm confiscation, forced relocation, and fabricated performance violations. A single attorney in 2025 represented over 750 federal whistleblowers whose careers were systematically dismantled for speaking out. [Continued in the comments]

Shadows of the Sphinx: The Complete Reconstruction (2013–2019) Operation Designation: Shadows of the Sphinx Discoverer/First Public Archivist: Lance Henderson Initial Disclosure Date: December 5, 2025 Current Status (as of December 7, 2025): This remains the first publicly assigned designation and the most comprehensive open-source reconstruction of a multinational counter-terrorism campaign that has never been officially acknowledged under any codename by the participating governments. "Shadows of the Sphinx" refers to a secretive, Cairo-centered multinational intelligence fusion and targeting operation that ran from 2013 to 2019, aimed at dismantling ISIS's Sinai Province (Wilayat Sinai, formerly Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis). The name reflects the operation's hidden nature—conducted in the shadows of Egypt's iconic symbol—and the deliberate structure of compartmentalization and plausible deniability that allowed all partners to avoid formal acknowledgment. No multilateral treaty or unified official codename ever existed; instead, it functioned through a web of overlapping contributions centered in Cairo. The campaign emerged in response to the rapid expansion of jihadist forces in the Sinai Peninsula following Egypt's 2013 military coup against President Mohamed Morsi. ISIS-Sinai grew into a major threat, attacking Egyptian security forces, targeting Israel's southern border, and endangering regional stability, including Red Sea shipping lanes. By 2016, the group had reached a peak of approximately 1,000 active fighters. Participating Agencies and Contributions The operation involved four key intelligence and military entities, pieced together from declassified documents, parliamentary reports, investigative journalism, and UN monitoring: 1. United States (CIA Special Activities Division/Ground Branch + NSA): Provided persistent drone surveillance and strikes (approximately 50–60 annual Reaper/Hellfire missions, often launched from Egyptian soil), signals intelligence via tools like XKEYSCORE and MYSTIC, geolocation support, and substantial undisclosed funding. U.S. contributions framed as "security assistance to Egypt." 2. France (DGSE Service Action + Operation Sirli detachment): Embedded 20–30 officers permanently with Egyptian forces, supplying reconnaissance flights, human intelligence, and targeting data that accounted for roughly 70% of the shared intelligence packages used for Egyptian airstrikes. French involvement stemmed from concerns over its citizens joining ISIS-Sinai. 3. Israel (Mossad Kidron/Neviot units + Unit 8200): Delivered high-precision geolocation (accurate to within meters), signals disruption, AI-driven targeting, drone technology transfers, real-time support, and occasional cross-border actions (including unattributed airstrikes and assassinations). Israeli contributions intensified after the 2015 Metrojet bombing attributed to ISIS-Sinai, with a reported 55% cell disruption rate from their "advise-and-accompany" protocols. 4. Egypt (General Intelligence Directorate – GID, host nation forces including Task Force Saiqa and Unit 777): Hosted the central hub, executed the majority of ground raids, airstrikes, and detentions, and publicly claimed all actions as unilateral Egyptian operations. Egypt provided the political cover, bases, interrogations, and deniability for all partners. [Continue in the comments]

BREAKING: Austin, TX Police have issued a SHELTER-IN-PLACE warning for a large swath of the city, seen in the below map, as a shooter is going around firing AT RANDOM in the area Up to NINE shootings have taken place since last night, and four have been shot. Two fire stations have also been shot at, and police are looking for suspect(s) possible in their late teens. Supposedly, they’re switching between the vehicles seen below. Anyone in Austin with info is encouraged to call 911 immediately.

The Pentagon's Not-So-Hidden Hand in Hollywood: Documented Influence on American Cinema—————————————————————— The U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) partnership with Hollywood is one of the most enduring and documented forms of institutional narrative control in modern media. Far from mere consultation, the DoD's Entertainment Liaison Office (ELO)—formalized post-World War II and overseen for decades by figures like Phil Strub (1989–2018)—trades access to military hardware, bases, personnel, and expertise for direct script oversight. Producers submit drafts, receive annotated revisions, and sign Production Assistance Agreements that bind them to approved versions. Denials or withdrawals of support are common for portrayals deemed "inaccurate" or unflattering, such as incompetence, war crimes, or ethical lapses. FOIA-released documents, including thousands of pages from branch-specific ELO reports (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines) and the central DoD database, confirm involvement in over 1,800 productions, with estimates doubling when accounting for incomplete records. DoD Instruction 5410.16 explicitly limits support to projects that "benefit the DoD," prioritizing recruitment, retention, and public image. The Mechanics of Control: From Phil Strub's Desk to On-Set Oversight Phil Strub, the longtime ELO chief, personally vetted scripts, demanding changes to ensure "positive" military depictions. As Strub stated, any film portraying the military negatively was deemed "not realistic." Examples from FOIA files include: - Rejections for films like Apocalypse Now (anti-war tone), Platoon (war crimes), and Superman IV (nuclear disarmament plot). - Script alterations in Windtalkers (removing gold tooth extraction from Japanese dead), Behind Enemy Lines (Strub's notes demanding removal of unflattering scenes), and Man of Steel (initial denial for "cartoony" military incompetence; revisions secured support). - Transformers series: DoD supplied tanks and vehicles across multiple films, demanding excision of scenes implying corporate-military corruption or oil company influence. On-set "project officers" enforce compliance, with preview screenings allowing final tweaks. Recent FOIAs (e.g., Marine Corps reports 2008–2015, over 1,600 pages; Army and Air Force files) reveal escalating involvement in TV and films, often proactive—ELOs pitch ideas or shape early development. Systemic Messaging: Normalization and "Key Talking Points" The influence is subtle and pervasive: mandated inserts glorify the military while scrubbing critiques. Contracts require "key talking points" like competence, heroism, and technological superiority. Post-9/11, this extended to reality TV and unscripted programming, with DoD payments for pro-military messaging. - Zero Dark Thirty (2012): CIA/DoD cooperation framed torture as effective for bin Laden's capture, despite declassified Senate reports proving otherwise. FOIA memos show script changes softening protagonist involvement, removing negative elements (e.g., dog abuse, excessive drinking), and retaining heroic framing. - Top Gun (1986): Navy-provided assets glorified aviation; recruitment inquiries surged significantly. - Top Gun: Maverick (2022): Extensive Navy support, including actor base tours and vetoes; screened pre-release for alignment, with recruitment booths in theaters amid enlistment shortages. This creates cultural osmosis: endless war normalized, emerging tech (drones in Iron Man, 2008) heroicized years before real-world expansions. [Continued in the comments]

DARPA and NSA: Significant Roles in Project Stargate and Mind Control Research ————–—————–—————–—————–— While Project Stargate (encompassing predecessors like SCANATE, Grill Flame, Center Lane, and Sun Streak) is primarily linked to the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and U.S. Army Intelligence (INSCOM), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and National Security Agency (NSA) played notable and interconnected roles. Declassified documents reveal DARPA's (formerly ARPA until 1972) direct financial and technical contributions, particularly in funding remote viewing research and exploring related neuroscience for behavioral influence. These efforts extended into mind control techniques, building on Cold War-era projects like Project Pandora, which investigated electromagnetic effects on the brain. Meanwhile, the NSA focused on signals intelligence monitoring of foreign psi programs, providing critical context for Stargate's development. Together, these agencies formed a network advancing unconventional intelligence methods, with DARPA's innovations in neurotechnology laying groundwork for modern brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) that blur the lines between enhancement and control. DARPA's Direct Funding and Technological Overlaps ————–—————–—————–—————–— DARPA provided substantial support during Stargate's formative years, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, aligning with its mission to pursue high-risk technologies for national security. This involvement included direct funding for remote viewing experiments and ties to behavioral modification research that informed mind control techniques. - Funding for Grill Flame and SRI Research: Declassified Grill Flame reports detail DARPA's allocation of approximately $200,000 to the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) contract from FY 1981–1983, part of a $1.475 million total budget shared with DIA and Army INSCOM. This supported key tasks like viewer training, intelligence studies, data management, and countermeasures against foreign psi threats. SRI, a central hub for Stargate's early experiments, benefited from DARPA's resources to refine Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV) protocols, demonstrating DARPA's active role in sustaining the program's scientific backbone. - Broader Institutional Engagement: In the mid-1980s, as Stargate transitioned under DIA control (renamed Sun Streak), DARPA participated in discussions with agencies like DIA, NSA, and the Army Medical Research and Development Command. While modest, this interest led to minor contracts and collaborations, reflecting DARPA's strategy to explore anomalous cognition for potential military applications. Declassified reports note DARPA's evaluation of remote viewing's intelligence value, including reexaminations post-1995 shutdown that highlighted anomalies in viewer performance. - Project Pandora and Mind Control Foundations: DARPA's 1965–1970 Project Pandora ($4.6 million budget) studied microwave radiation's effects on behavior, inspired by the "Moscow Signal" incident where Soviets targeted the U.S. Embassy with low-level microwaves. Experiments on animals (e.g., Project BIZARRE with rhesus monkeys) explored non-thermal EMF influences on the nervous system, concluding potential health and behavioral risks. This research paralleled Stargate's focus on altered states of consciousness and tied into broader mind control efforts, overlapping with CIA's MKUltra subprojects on drugs and hypnosis. DARPA's early work in electromagnetic manipulation laid groundwork for techniques to alter nervous system function, as noted in declassified 1977 correspondence acknowledging exploratory intent.