Warehouse job in Australia 🇦🇺 demands “Double vaccinated + Booster” just to stack boxes. 📦
Lifting 20kg objects? Fine.
Working 8-4.30? Sure.
But first… prove you’re boosted or you’re unemployable.
In 2026.
We went from “two weeks to flatten the curve” to “get your next jab or starve.”
Australia really turned “my body, my choice” into “our needle, your livelihood.”
This is still happening.
This needs to be heard again. Someone like Bronwyn Bishop should be running any independent inquiry not some left wing stooge who will just recommend pumping more taxpayer's money into the issue.
Bookmark this, read it twice, the ‘DEPRESSION AUSTRALIA HAD TO HAVE’ is coming.
⚠️Australia is heading for a catastrophic Stagflationary collapse. Both the economy and the property markets will crash, people will go hungry.
✴️The RBA will likely raise interest rates on Tuesday into:
-Consumer confidence at an all time low.
-Property auction clearance rates at all time lows.
-Property prices in Sydney and Melbourne already falling.
-And supply chain disruptions are still coming.
✴️Australia imports more diesel and fertiliser per capita than any other developed nation, and we exist at the end of the world’s longest supply chain. The Middle East war/closure of the straits of Hormuz shock is heading our way, with a delay.
✴️No fertilizer➡️No crops➡️No food.
No diesel➡️No transportation.
✴️Economic activity is energy converted.
No energy=no economy.
✴️Consumer spending is about to fall off a cliff, and soon there will be little to buy anyways as supply chains crumble.
✴️Australia’s cost of living crisis is about to morph into a scarcity crisis.
✴️We are heading into a bankruptcy cycle for the ages, and Australia is about the have the the ‘depression it had to have’. Fiscal and monetary policy are ineffective in supply side crises.
✴️Many global governments will fall due to this crisis, Australia is likely to be one of them. We are being reassured by Albanese as we approach the cliff.
x.com/richardhirschs…#Stagflation@AvidCommentator@DFA_Analyst
Joe Rogan: "I dont think anybody should have nuclear weapons."
Theo Von: "Israel gets to have them."
Joe Rogan: "Allegedly."
Theo Von: "Everything is allegedly with them. Except for the genocide."
The Victorian Electoral Commission have contacted me to make legal threats concerning my public commentary on the @LiberalVictoria campaign material which was in my opinion deceptive and designed to be confused with @PaulineHansonOz and the @OneNationAus Party.
The VEC are demanding I take that material down because I'm not willing to dox myself by publishing my home address for all the world to see, I instead published my suburb, and as a public figure I can be contacted a bunch of different ways... an exact street address would make absolutely NO difference to anyone... except to expose me to stalking, harassment, or targeted violence.
A few things:
1. the Liberal Party were given the VEC's A-OK to use One Nation colours and produce a piece of campaign material that was designed and intended to not appear to be a piece of Liberal Party campaign material. Literally the ONLY thing linking this material to the Liberal Party is the Authorisation statement, and you'd have to use google to figure out that it was the Liberals because a name and address doesn't tell you a damn thing about a damn thing.
Apparently that's ok.
2. I produced a video exposing their dirty tricks, and I complied as fully with the law as I could without putting my personal safety, and that of my family, at risk, but now I'm the one on the receiving end of legal threats.
What this shows is twofold:
1. Current Victorian electoral law is no longer fit for purpose in an age of social media where we're ALL commentating all the time and the line between private and professional commentary is all but non-existent.
2. The Victorian Electoral Commission is ok with deceptive practices as long as they tick the right boxes, but not ok with EXPOSING deceptive practices because the box is only 90% ticked. This is literally government logic in a nutshell. You can get away with anything if you keep the bureaucrats happy...
3. How is this not a suppression of the implied right to political communication for anyone who does not have a 3rd party address to list on anything political that they post? (ie, 90% of the population) It disenfranchises anyone without a non-residential address from commenting on politics right at the moment in time when it matters most... an election.
I don't believe any electoral laws anywhere in Australia were written at a time when it was possible for literally anyone to reach literally everyone from the comfort of their lounge room, and the laws need to be updated to reflect this new reality.
Do the VEC really believe it's not clear who is responsible for the material? The purpose of authorisations is to remove ambiguity and ensure integrity in elections... do they really think it's ambiguous in my case?
Or is the truth really that the Victorian Liberal Party stumbled across it and complained because THEY were trying to get away with being deceptive and I was exposing them?
The upshot? The VEC are now doing more to protect deceptive practices than they are to expose them. Classic government.
Annoyingly the VEC didn't even provide links to the videos across all the platforms, now I have to waste my time finding them and either removing or making them private till after the Nepean election just to keep a bureaucrat happy.
I would absolutely LOVE to give the VEC a proper hard time over this, if nothing else to get them to pull their fingers out and make recommendations to parliament to update the laws so they catch up with the 21st century.
Any legal eagles ready or able to give me some thoughts? I note, for example, that they've failed to provide a reference number on the document, something which I suspect puts them in breach of their own internal rules and might be something I could have some fun with... Ideas welcome.
I really enjoyed sitting down with my son Derek for his podcast. This is my last post about our discussion. He asked some important questions about the influence of the gospel of Jesus Christ in my life. I was grateful for the opportunity to share my thoughts.
Let me aske the un-askable question.
If respecting indigenous culture is so important, why are white, oppressive colonisers denying indigenous Australians their version of justice?
The victim is indigenous, the accused is indigenous, the crime was in an indigenous community, and the mob gathered outside the hospital is made up mostly or perhaps entirely of indigenous people...
But we're imposing white-man, colonial, oppressive ideas like... 'innocent until proven guilty', like a 'jury of your peers', like having a day in court and a proper defence and not being murdered before trial by a mob of angry locals.
Where are the lefties who supported the voice? The ones who condemn us if we question the 'welcome to country'? Those who insist that indigenous culture is inherently virtuous because it got here first... and English civilisation is inherently evil because it took over later?
Where are they? When will they speak up in support of handing the accused over to the angry mob?
Because right now members of the indigenous community would like to carry out their culturally appropriate form of justice in this case, and it's the evil white man who is stopping them.
How dare we!?!
But actually the real question is this... if we're all going to agree that western justice is more civilized, that mob justice isn't acceptable even in such an emotionally charged case as this one... then doesn't that means we should also be allowed to ask whether perhaps western civilisation is better in other ways too? Doesn't it beg the question whether English civilisation actually improved Australia?
And if not... then why not just hand the accused over the mob? It would stop the riots after all...
Yeah, I know, I'm 'evil' just for pointing out the hypocrisy, come at me in the comments.
Erika Kirk claims that “Every morning I have to wake up & hear Candace Owens claim that I murdered my husband.”
She says this despite the fact that Candace Owens has NEVER made such a claim!
Out of control crime is actually 'out of control government'.
Every crime wave in Australia right now has its roots in the same thing... government.
Turns out that Canberra is biggest and baddest mob-boss of them all...
Support my work by buying me a coffee here: store.topherfield.com
Join my email list to be in the running for my $2,000 giveaway!
And help me keep the Topher Project going by checking out my books, DVDs, tee shirts, hoodies, caps, and stickers via the link above!