XabiAurelius 🏛️

@MadridSpot @YashRMFC I thought the yellow was for complaining? At least it’s how it looked like to me

@YashRMFC But Negreira referee give Mbappe a yellow for this. Unbelievable..

The referee didn't book this Girona player, but booked Mbappé because he dribbled past two players.

We just released Music Marketplace in ElevenCreative. To celebrate, we’re giving away 5,000 free credits so you can create and publish your first track. For the next 6 hours: retweet + follow @ElevenCreative and we’ll DM you the credits (must follow).

@SIayfer @Bischof20SZN Leider liegt ihr beide falsch und Courtois ist der GOAT

@Bischof20SZN Dankeschön dass es endlich mal einer versteht bin genau deiner Meinung. Und es ist ja sag ich mal nichts hirnrissiges dass ich sage irgendwie ein Drittliga Keeper ist nach einem guten Spiel besser als Neuer. 🤝

Der Typ geht mir wirklich auf die Nerven Der lutscht in einer Tour bei seinen Spielern nur damit sie ihn akzeptieren 😵‍💫

🇪🇸😮‍💨 This TACKLE from 𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐆𝐎 𝐀𝐆𝐔𝐀𝐃𝐎 (𝟏𝟗)…

@nilskern17 5:0 🙂‍↕️

Bei wieder 10 Ausfällen ist eigentlich Auswahl begrenzt, und trotzdem: Pausen für Trent und Arda. Tchou oder Fede hätten auch mal… Das Ding ist eh: welches Gesicht wird diesmal gezeigt? Wieder 100% Einsatz und Teamwork? 😬 Tipp: 2:0! Und ihr so?

I have seen cules asking for the evidence of match fixing in Barca-Negreira case, under almost all of my posts. This stems from total ignorance about how corruption works. Barca is charged with systemic corruption not match fixing and both are two different things. Match fixing means manipulating the outcome of specific matches. That requires proof that referees deliberately changed decisions in particular matches. Systemic corruption is different. It means a club secretly paying someone with influence over referees or head of institution for years, which can create bias or preferential treatment across the system without needing proof that a specific match was fixed. Imagine a construction company secretly paying the head of the building permit office every month for years. Investigators may not be able to prove that permit #123 or permit #243 was illegally approved because of that payment. But the mere fact that the company was secretly paying the official who controls permits already constitutes corruption. The payments create influence over the whole system. The same logic applies here. You do not need proof that one specific match was fixed. If a club is paying someone who has authority or influence over referees for many years, that can be considered systemic corruption, even if no single match decision is directly proven to be manipulated. Barca literally paid Negreira, goddamn vice president of referee committee for decades secretly and there is solid proof for these payments after tax agencies uncovered it. So, please stop asking for match fixing evidence.

@grok @itsme52066525 @MadridUniversal @tjcope Do you think this person will be made accountable for that and has to pay the 15.000€ to Real Madrid?

The incident was a Real Madrid fan filmed appearing to perform a Nazi salute just before kickoff in their Champions League second-leg win over Benfica at the Bernabéu (Feb 25). The club identified, ejected, and banned the supporter. UEFA still fined Madrid €15,000 with a suspended partial stadium closure (probation 1 year).

🚨 UEFA have fined Real Madrid 15,000 euros and have warned of a partial closure of the Bernabeu after the incident in the match against Benfica. — @tjcope

"HERE WE GO!": the lowdown on "football journalist" Fabrizio Romano sportingintelligence832.substack.com/p/here-we-go-t…

@grok @futbolgate_ES Does it mean the RFEF is also involved or that someone knew about the potential corruption?

This post is about the ongoing "Caso Negreira" scandal with FC Barcelona. It claims that in 2021, Spain's Football Federation (RFEF) gave tax authorities a very limited summary of José María Enríquez Negreira's roles—saying his 2016-2018 duties were just "institutional representation"—while hiding his broader influence as VP of the referees' committee. The image shows the official tax doc quoting RFEF rules that gave that committee real power over referee assignments, promotions, and evaluations. It ties into Barca's €7M+ payments to Negreira's companies, now under criminal investigation for possible referee influence.

💥#CasoBarçaNegreira En 2021, la Real Federación Española de Fútbol (RFEF) ocultó información relevante sobre José María Enríquez Negreira en respuesta a requerimientos de la Agencia Tributaria. El organismo fiscal calificó la contestación de la Federación como “muy sucinta”. La Federación, entonces presidida por Luis Rubiales, aseguró que el único cargo que había ostentado Negreira entre 1993 y 2018 fue el de vicepresidente del Comité Técnico de Árbitros (CTA). Sin embargo, la realidad es que también desempeñó otras funciones relevantes dentro del estamento arbitral: fue miembro del Comité de Designación y vocal de designación entre 1993 y 2004, además de formar parte del Comité Sancionador durante la década de los noventa. La cuestión es por qué la RFEF omitió responsabilidades tan relevantes como su condición de uno de los tres miembros del Comité de Designación durante varios años. La ocultación no se detiene ahí. La RFEF también comunicó a Hacienda que, entre 2016 y 2018, sus únicas funciones eran “meramente de representación institucional”. Sin embargo, el propio Negreira afirmó que una de sus obligaciones “era revisar los informes que hacen los árbitros (el acta) después de cada partido y puntuarlos”, una tarea que, según explicó, realizaba cada semana o cada quince días. Según el reglamento de la RFEF de 2016, otras de sus funciones eran: - Clasificar a los árbitros. - Proponer los candidatos a árbitros internacionales. - Designar a los equipos arbitrales, a través del presidente del propio comité. - Designar a los delegados informadores. - Establecer y aplicar el índice corrector. La contestación de la Federación a Hacienda deja varias preguntas sin resolver: por qué se omitieron funciones clave de Negreira, qué conocía realmente la RFEF en ese momento y si esta versión incompleta buscaba proteger al FC Barcelona y limitar el riesgo de que el caso llegara a la Fiscalía.

Every retweet of this post will equal a dollar given to children with Leukemia.

@iamwilsxn how is your setup better for streaming? It maybe is better for building your library. stremio + torbox is perfect.

@nilskern17 Vini schafft etwas historisches: Erstes Minusrating bei Nils in der 3. HZ 😅

...und unten hatte ich aus Reflex erst Xabi hingeschrieben 😅...😭! Mehr: youtube.com/live/WIsNVKwXY…

🚨 Barca-Negreira Case Update: 1. Laporta testified in court today that he never met or knew Negreira or his son. The reality is that Laporta QUADRUPLED the payments, that were already way out of market range to Negreira during his first tenure. That alone makes it obvious that he is lying. Or he is a DUMMY President who doesn't know what's happening in his club!!🤡 Truth is Negreira was sitting in the Camp Nou box seats every other game, and his son was driving the referees from the airport to the stadium.. 2. Laporta also claimed that the reports were destroyed every five years. Obviously, he has to say this because he CANNOT bring reports that never existed in the first place. Yet in 2023, we all saw him bring red boxes to a press conference, claiming they contained referee reports. How could he present reports pre 2018 if, by his own statement, they should have been destroyed in 2023? 3. On top of that, former coaches Ernesto Valverde and Luis Enrique testified that they were NOT AWARE such reports existed. What makes this truly hilarious is that Laporta is still hiding behind the excuse of “reports” to defend this blatant corruption. Eight million euros worth of reports that no coach or executives or coaching staff has ever knew or used. So who uses this reports?? Barca team bus driver? As per reports, Laporta's appearance revealed that: – The payments had NO technical justification. - There are NO written contracts. – The alleged reports did NOT exist as a real sporting tool. – The former first team coaches - Ernesto Valverde and Luis Enrique -neither knew them nor used them. This is textbook behaviour of a corrupt organization that cannot produce a single piece of evidence or legitimate justification for what was clearly bribery.

Don Xabi.

@JesusVallejo 🐐

Castilla-La Mancha❤️ Septiembre 2025

A similar fate for Barca and Real Madrid at the 2024 and 2025 Ballon d’Or ceremonies. 😐

@AdriRM33 @RealMario1902

@GBarca_ Ez for all the big clubs in LaLiga like Real Madrid

Imagine trying to register all that in La Liga