⚔️Panda

4.1K posts

⚔️Panda banner
⚔️Panda

⚔️Panda

@Xpanda666

Just a panda nobody

Katılım Ekim 2015
339 Takip Edilen318 Takipçiler
⚔️Panda retweetledi
Ray Dalio
Ray Dalio@RayDalio·
I have been asked by several people what I meant when I said “we are in a world war” in my most recent note. To be clear, I didn’t mean to convey that I expect a shooting war between the U.S. and China (or any of the great powers) anytime soon. What I meant is that we are in the phase of the Big Cycle when major powers are in military wars and that the various wars happening now are interrelated, hence we are in a “world war," with the sides lined up as I described and with the implications for each of the main players and the whole unfolding in relatively classic interrelated ways that I describe as a progression of the Big Cycle. For example, it is now widely believed that if the U.S. fails to open the Strait of Hormuz to have free shipping and to protect its Gulf Allies from attacks, countries all around the world (most importantly in Asia) will conclude that the U.S. might not be the strong ally and countervailing force to China that they thought it would be. which will lead some to tilt economically and geopolitically more toward China in a number of ways - e.g. to buy less U.S. debt (which is what happened to the British in the Suez Crisis, bringing about the ultimate end of their Empire) - and it could lead others to build up their military capabilities.  As I complete my nearly three-week trip in Asia, I can convey that what I am saying is based on a lot more than conjecture. The reason I do not expect a U.S.-China military war soon, but I do expect a lot of brinksmanship, is because both nations realize that such a war would be devastating and that it would be impossible to fully win over the other, at the same time as they won’t want to give much.  Also, each country believes in its own economic and political systems and that the outcomes of those systems will determine their relative powers. And both nations have critically important domestic issues to deal with.  Some people in leadership positions, especially in China, believe that the relative health, wealth, and power levels between countries is not as important as their own absolute health, wealth, and power levels, and that helping each other build these rather than tear them down is most important. For example, they believe that the world will be a dangerous place if the U.S. and China don't have AI cooperations and controls, and they are concerned that AI can be weaponized. Most countries know that most wars in history were won by one of the sides secretly developing new technologically advanced weapons and showing them to their opponents. So, I believe that both sides think that their wars will be non-military wars that will yield evolutionary changes in relative powers.  As for how the Chinese will fight, and how the world order related to it will evolve, it will probably look more like the type of war described in the “Art of War” (which I suggest you read if you haven't), and for how the new international world order will evolve, to the extent that it is influenced by the Chinese, it will evolve to be more like the tribute system (which I suggest you understand if you don’t) than the existing world order. At the same time, I expect that there will continue to be trade, capital, technology, cyber, and geopolitical influence wars between these great powers and that both will continue to have justifiable fears of being cut off from essential goods, services, and capital that will necessarily will greatly reduce imbalances and interdependencies as well as efficiencies in production and trade of goods, services, and capital. I also believe we will increasingly see these two powerful nations pressure each other because there is no other way to resolve disputes now that the rules-based multilateral world order has been replaced by a power-based, self-serving world order. Said differently, I expect that China will be very strong in its defense without being very aggressive in its offense.  That is not just for tactical reasons; it is also because China has strong cultural inclinations to be that way. I hope this is helpful in clarifying my thinking and as always I'd be happy to answer any other questions or hear your thoughts. Ray
English
135
391
2.1K
279.1K
⚔️Panda retweetledi
Li Zexin 李泽欣
Li Zexin 李泽欣@XH_Lee23·
Chongqing’s magic is that anyone can shoot movie-like scenes.
English
4
58
325
5.4K
First Squawk
First Squawk@FirstSquawk·
BESSENT STATES CHINA IS AN UNRELIABLE PARTNER IN WAR; CHINA IS HOARDING OIL, BUYING MORE, AND STOPPING EXPORTS OF VARIOUS PRODUCTS.
English
135
116
648
233.3K
⚔️Panda retweetledi
Semafor
Semafor@semafor·
"I think blocking the Strait of Hormuz is fine from my standpoint," @SenRickScott tells @burgessev. “If no oil ever goes to China again, and their economy is destroyed, that would be a really wonderful day for me."
English
598
226
635
835.6K
☆
@Mooskatool·
How the fuck do you get more mass on your biceps cause I just look more toned n thats it
English
222
40
4.6K
912.8K
⚔️Panda retweetledi
Sulaiman Ahmed
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman·
JUST IN: Xi Jinping to Pedro Sánchez: China and Spain are both principled and reasonable countries. We are willing to stand on the right side of history. We should oppose the law of the jungle and together maintain true multilateralism and protect world peace and development.
English
120
2.7K
11.1K
159.8K
我是梦嫣❤️
我是梦嫣❤️@mengyan1234567·
这绝对是一个日本人看了会沉默、韩国人看了会流泪的视频😑
中文
77
28
311
27.7K
⚔️Panda
⚔️Panda@Xpanda666·
@Polymarket A few hypersonic missles and drone swarms everyone scurry and hide like rats
English
0
0
3
579
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: More than 17,000 troops will take part in largest-ever military drills with U.S., Philippines & other nations amid growing China threats.
English
156
450
3.9K
145.2K
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
Crypto has had a rough year. Maybe we should launch something to fix it.
English
12.7K
5.2K
43.1K
6M
Andy Boreham 安柏然
TRUMP ON UNCLE GORDON: “You know, I listened to this Gordon Chang [on China], he has no idea what he's talking about."
Andy Boreham 安柏然 tweet media
English
226
204
1.9K
113.1K
⚔️Panda
⚔️Panda@Xpanda666·
@WSJ Did we steal your tech? Temu drugs? But at what cost?
English
0
0
2
376
⚔️Panda retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am a Web3 Ambassador at World Liberty Financial. There are 12 of us on the team page. 4 are named Trump. 3 are named Witkoff. The page calls us "the passionate minds shaping the future of finance." 600,000 wallets bought our memecoin. They lost $3.87 billion. The family collected $350 million in trading fees. It launched 3 days before the inauguration. 80% of the supply went to CIC Digital LLC and Fight Fight Fight LLC. I did not choose the names. I designed the allocation, the vesting, the timing, and the distance between the product and the President. The distance is my best work. I am the reason these events are unrelated. World Liberty Financial sends 75 cents of every dollar to DT Marks DEFI LLC. That is the family entity. Zero capital contributed. Zero liability assumed. I wrote this into the Gold Paper. Page 14. The lawyers bound it in white leather. The binding cost more than the due diligence. Justin Sun invested $75 million. He was facing SEC fraud charges. The SEC dropped the case. He is now our advisor. These events are unrelated. Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to federal money laundering violations. He received a presidential pardon. The SEC dropped its lawsuit against his exchange the same week we listed our stablecoin. Then the exchange settled a $2 billion deal entirely in that stablecoin. These events are unrelated. Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, and Samuel Reed of BitMEX pleaded guilty to Bank Secrecy Act violations. All 3 received presidential pardons. Then the company itself was pardoned. $100 million in fines. Gone. An American first. These events are unrelated. Sheikh Tahnoun of Abu Dhabi paid $500 million for a 49% stake that was never publicly disclosed. Then the administration approved semiconductor exports to his companies over national security objections. These events are unrelated. Everything is unrelated. I track the unrelatedness on a dashboard I built. The dashboard has 7 columns now. I am proud of the dashboard. On May 22nd, 220 people paid a combined $148 million to eat dinner with the America First president. Over half were foreign nationals. Justin Sun paid $18.5 million for the first seat. He visited the Executive Office Building the day before. I designed the seating chart. I put it on the Investor Confidence page. That page is doing well. The team page lists 3 Witkoffs. All 3 are Co-Founders. Steven Witkoff is the President's Middle East envoy. He testified as a character witness at the President's fraud trial. His son Zach runs the crypto operation. His son Alex is also a Co-Founder. I have not been told what Alex co-founded. The father runs the diplomacy. The sons run the platform. The family runs both. That is organizational efficiency. Barron is 19. His title is Web3 Ambassador. The same as mine. Donald Jr. called the conflicts of interest "complete nonsense." Eric launched a Bitcoin mining company called American Bitcoin. America First. The mining partner is Hut 8. Hut 8 was founded in Canada. America First means the name. On March 6th, the President signed Executive Order 14233 creating a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The order directs the government to hold Bitcoin. The President's family holds billions in Bitcoin. The executive order appreciates the President's assets by presidential decree. I did not write the executive order. I made sure it looked unrelated to the portfolio. Trump Media put $2 billion of Bitcoin on its balance sheet. The ticker symbol is DJT. His initials. The press secretary said it is absurd to insinuate the President profits off the presidency. Forbes calculated his crypto holdings exceed the combined value of Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower. I would call that absurd too. That is my job. 600,000 wallets bought in. 1 of them asked why she could not withdraw her funds. I told her the protocol was experiencing dynamic market conditions. She asked what that meant. I sent her the Gold Paper. She said she had read the Gold Paper. I muted her channel. Dynamic means the conditions change. The condition that changed was her access. A congressman called us the world's most corrupt crypto startup operation. We put it on a coffee mug. Ironic merchandise. $45. The revenue split on the mug is also 75/25. My own tokens vest on a different schedule. I wrote that schedule. That is not in the Gold Paper. The memecoin funds the family. The family funds the platform. The platform funds the stablecoin. The stablecoin funds the deals. The deals require the pardons. The pardons free the partners. The partners fund the platform. The President signs the executive orders. The executive orders inflate the assets. The assets fund the family. I am the reason these events are unrelated.
Peter Girnus 🦅 tweet media
English
1.7K
7.4K
23.5K
5.4M
⚔️Panda
⚔️Panda@Xpanda666·
@asahi This is the path to war. Time to settle old debts
English
0
0
0
37
朝日新聞(asahi shimbun)
高市首相「憲法改正、時は来た」 就任後初の党大会、改憲発議に意欲 asahi.com/articles/ASV4D… 自民党は12日、高市早苗首相(党総裁)の就任後としては初めてとなる党大会を都内のホテルで開いた。首相は憲法改正をめぐり、「日本人の手による自主的な憲法改正は党是だ。時は来た」と主張。
日本語
1.5K
2K
2.2K
3.4M
⚔️Panda
⚔️Panda@Xpanda666·
@Breaking911 Short of going kinetic what else can you do to china that you have not done already?
English
1
0
0
267
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
President Trump on reports that China is preparing to ship weapons to Iran: "If China does that, China is gonna have big problems."
English
32
61
329
39.2K
MonitorX
MonitorX@MonitorX99800·
🇺🇸🇮🇷🇨🇳⚡️BREAKING: China is going to have big problems if they send weapons to Iran — Trump
English
94
83
386
29K
⚔️Panda retweetledi
笋初🪁🌻💤
笋初🪁🌻💤@Vxujianing·
无数人在二战中丧生,2700万俄罗斯人被纳粹德国杀害,3500多万中国人被军国主义日本杀害,为什么二战说到种族灭绝和大屠杀人们只关心犹太人?是什么让犹太人如此特别???
中文
260
350
1.8K
50.2K
⚔️Panda retweetledi
China Now
China Now@ChinaNow24·
The problem with Japan is not that China no longer sees it as important. Its real problem is that it still believes the protection of other powers can inflate its geopolitical weight. China asks only one thing: stop provoking and stop confusing borrowed power with national courage. Asia is stable for one reason: China exists. Do you agree?
English
33
76
284
11.8K
Li Mengbai
Li Mengbai@lvjin1993·
男友已到楼下,30分钟紧急整容……
中文
402
90
1.1K
916.4K