Scotsbhoy1111

2.2K posts

Scotsbhoy1111

Scotsbhoy1111

@YaldyScience

Katılım Mayıs 2023
142 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
This works because we live on a slowly rotating globe. Reminder: the sun can never rise or set on a flat Earth. Yes, every Flerf in existence is in denial of thst simple fact. Yes, it’s that easy to debunk flat Earth. Yes, every Flerf is that dumb.
English
12
9
88
2K
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@Frenchy8m @gomiam @alexboge We can destroy your fairytale quicker if you stop being vague..... We are asking HOW is it possible? How can the sun stay the same size all day and move at the same pace, but once it gets to the horizon it disappears bottom and and zips away at supersonic speed?
English
1
0
1
34
Bill Sikes 🇮🇱🇬🇧
Bill Sikes 🇮🇱🇬🇧@RoscoeP61369413·
@NS_1872 It's a touchy subject for the bheasts knowing the club died in 1994. They actually died again in 2002 when Pacific Shelf 1994 became HMS 402 2002. Wee googly eyes Fergus didn't save them he simply formed a new company (newco). Still have to pay the victims though. All 304.
Bill Sikes 🇮🇱🇬🇧 tweet media
English
3
0
1
160
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@yokcitytilidie @kieran_ashton1 I love that you think this bothers us..... We are rated 42nd and are utter shite. We know that. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 though. Rated 4th, seeded team who don't play big teams until the quarters of any tourney and still come home with the same amount of trophies as 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿.
English
1
0
1
168
❌Not today Satan❌
❌Not today Satan❌@GypsyRose_onX·
@HLehmann73406 Your pipe dream that earth is a spinny ball flying through space, will unfortunately, never come true. Read the Bible nasa fanboi 🤣🤡
English
17
0
2
426
❌Not today Satan❌
❌Not today Satan❌@GypsyRose_onX·
Weirdly enough, none of these need to factor any amount of curvature into their calculations 😎😊
❌Not today Satan❌ tweet media
English
117
66
261
9.9K
Sphere Not!
Sphere Not!@AdonaiOnGaia·
Sooooo dam stupid. Stop comparing this to a plane please. Your model has you moving in at least 3 different directions on an unenclosed system retarded fast and the velocity by your own model is not a constant. Morons.
Sphere Not! tweet media
English
41
4
31
3.2K
mjs670
mjs670@mjs1932·
@MMcculloch2563 @scotlandscoeff1 @spfl & how are these evidence of Celtic cheating ? Where is your evidence of collusion between Celtic & officials ? Any receipts ? Any bank transfers ? Any pictures of cash exchanging hands ? Or are you just pissing into the wind ?
English
2
0
1
70
sec557🟥⬜🟦🇬🇧
sec557🟥⬜🟦🇬🇧@MMcculloch2563·
@scotlandscoeff1 @spfl If you believe they were ever going to be allowed to win the title under any circumstances you're insane. Was it not made abundantly clear during the split with 7 major decisions in the run in all going in favour of Celtic. They gained a 17 point swing from the corruption.
English
6
1
56
2.7K
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@iamwrknprgrss @alexboge Did Von Braun come back from the dead and tell his family what to put on his headstone?🤔 Also, the Hebrew translation is "sky" "heavens" or "expanse" not some mythical sky dome.
English
1
0
1
23
wrknprgrss
wrknprgrss@iamwrknprgrss·
@alexboge What do you make of Wernher von Braun believing in the firmament? o/
English
2
0
0
37
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Let's take down the moon landing deniers and the idea that the landings were faked. Over the decades I've had time to examine every moon landing hoax claim I've ever come across. The shadows, the flag, the missing stars, the crosshairs, the Van Allen belts, the erased tapes, the Kubrick fan fiction. All of it. I have never once encountered a claim that couldn't be explained, debunked, and flat out demolished almost immediately. I strain to think of a single one that required more than a minute of thought or a couple minutes of research using nothing more exotic than a search engine. Not one. And here's why I'm comfortable being that blunt. On one side of the ledger: 382 kg of lunar samples independently studied in labs worldwide, retroreflectors still bouncing lasers back to Earth on demand, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imagery of the landing sites showing hardware and boot tracks, and the Soviet Union, an adversary with every incentive and full tracking capability to expose a fake, confirming the missions in real time. On the other side of the ledger: nothing. Not one shred of positive evidence for a hoax has ever been presented. Everything a denier has ever brought up is a misinterpretation, a misunderstanding, or a flat out lie. Same three bins as the Flerfs. Always the same three bins. Now watch the comments demonstrate my point. Whatever gets posted below has been covered and debunked before, most of it for decades. Nobody is going to present something new here, because there is nothing new. The entire catalog was exhausted before most of the people posting it were born. Moon landing denial is a zombie conspiracy. It died a long time ago. It just never learned how to stop walking.
Alex Boge tweet media
English
7
1
22
876
GsOnDs
GsOnDs@6lackHeart69·
@alexboge They said this was unedited, unfiltered so why does it come up as CGI..?? Without your "space agencies" and government footage and ancient math, prove it's a globe..!!
GsOnDs tweet media
English
4
1
1
88
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Peak irony: a flat earther falsely claims there are no raw photographs of planet Earth in existence. Putting aside the absurdity of that claim - note that there are zero photographs of a flat earth. Not raw, not edited, not even composites. Six years of Blue Marble imagery from DSCOVR alone says otherwise for the globe. So here’s a challenge. Provide one unedited photograph showing the entire flat earth, ice wall to ice wall, with verifiable metadata, and I’ll pay you $50,000. I sleep well making that offer. You can’t photograph something that doesn’t exist.
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman

Did you know that there isn't a single raw photograph of planet Earth in existence? Every one we have ever seen is a "composite" or "artist's concept". NASA has tens of thousands of satellites up there, and are posting constant Instagram images of planets, stars, constellations, etc. that are thousands of light years away...but we can't get a single raw image of Earth without photoshop? 🤨 Strange. h/t @JustinWeRchange

English
13
1
41
1.7K
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@PaulaRivers57 @alexboge You've still not addressed anything I've said. Word of God. Is that the book with talking donkeys and where life began with dust and a rib. The compas absolutely does not work on a FE
Scotsbhoy1111 tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Paula Rivers
Paula Rivers@PaulaRivers57·
@YaldyScience @alexboge Tesla, or maybe it was Einstein, said you can make numbers say anything. All true science is based on real-life observation. Timelapse photography videos reveal a lot that geometry could NEVER reveal. Keep the Word of God as your compass. A compass works on a FLAT circle.
Paula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Hey flat Earthers, I know the Sun is probably your model’s biggest headache. Instead of arguing about how your local Sun would eventually cook everything under the dome, let’s keep it simple. I’m genuinely curious. Science has learned an incredible amount about the real Sun. We know it’s about 150 million km (93 million miles) away. We know it’s about 1.39 million km in diameter. We know it’s a star powered by nuclear fusion, converting hydrogen into helium and producing the light, heat, and radiation that sustain life on Earth. We know its mass, composition, temperature, spectrum, rotation rate, magnetic cycles, and even detect the neutrinos produced in its core. These are objective, measurable facts. Your model replaces all of that with a small, local Sun beneath a dome. So here are a few simple questions: • How big is it? • What is it made of? • What powers it? • How does it stay suspended in the air? • What powers its movement? • How does it follow its daily path? • How does it change the diameter of that path throughout the year, moving between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn? • How does it “know” exactly when to make those changes? These aren’t trick questions. They’re the most basic specifications for the object that supposedly provides all the light and energy for your world. If your model is correct, answering them should be easy. I challenge all flat earthers to provide answers, so that none of us should strawman your model. It’s your time to shine.
Alex Boge tweet media
English
24
10
71
2.4K
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
youtu.be/gzjFOZ00Ka8?is… This guy explains what happens to a lens when there is glare. He also shows you what a sunset looks like without glare. Enjoy
YouTube video
YouTube
GIF
English
0
0
3
18
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@PaulaRivers57 You've done it again! Fingers in the ear and "lalalalala"..... If its circling around the NP how does Johannesburg, Santiago and Auckland all get sunlight at the same time for 4 hours in December, but everything in between them is in darkness? Its time to grow up Paula.
Scotsbhoy1111 tweet media
English
1
0
4
37
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@PaulaRivers57 @alexboge You ignored my last reply explaining how basic geometry disproves your claim, then posted another glare filled sunset video..... Show a sunset filmed through a proper solar filter where the Sun's angular size actually changes. There's hundreds on YT. Glare isn't evidence.
English
2
0
5
35
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@PaulaRivers57 @alexboge I'm assuming you're just trolling, but I can't be too sure nowadays. With they measurements, simple geometry says that the sun moving 280 miles away would rapidly decrease its size to 1/10th of it size.
English
1
0
7
46
Paula Rivers
Paula Rivers@PaulaRivers57·
@alexboge The sun & moon are 1600 ft wide and 28 miles high. The sun is a heat lamp, while moonlight is cold. The sun keeps the igloo from freezing up over us. The sky-dome is made of frozen air. It's extremely cold. A piece of sky ice goes directly from a solid to a gas, like dry ice.
Paula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet mediaPaula Rivers tweet media
English
8
0
1
250
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@SocialismIsCrap @TakeThatClouds @Burki677 "Doesn't have the capability to zoom that far" 🤣🤣🤣🤣. Then why does it see the top of the buildings and not the bottom? They are the same distance for f**k sake. The mental gymnastics flerfs have to endure to keep this fairytale going is embarrassing.
English
0
0
4
29
Socialism Sucks
Socialism Sucks@SocialismIsCrap·
@TakeThatClouds @Burki677 No it’s because the camera doesn’t have the capability to zoom that far. The curvature calculation say we shouldn’t be able to see any of the skyline. Which obviously we can
English
2
0
0
32
just a bystander
just a bystander@_free_f0rever_·
@YaldyScience @Flerfspective If you are fixated on the added altitude meter and not the cartoonishly fake "earth curve", you have already lost the plot. Carry on.
English
1
0
0
23
Trevor Long
Trevor Long@TrevorL415·
Shrink it and realize it's just a drawing. Placements and linear distances are off. That said...it's generally like this 👇 but different. Drop on in the 🧵 4 more...👇
Trevor Long tweet media
English
13
6
30
1.2K
Scotsbhoy1111
Scotsbhoy1111@YaldyScience·
@_free_f0rever_ @Flerfspective Caught lying, defends it with more BS. Did you not see the original video I sent you, showing that there was no fake "altitude meter"(not space lingo). The full launch is on YT. Get out of that rabbit hole of yours and take a peek out. You might stop embarrassing yourself.
English
1
0
1
37