Marcos García Ochoa

@benwehrman If you value your intuition above measurements, please don't design anything.

The Globe Earth vs. Flat Earth debate is a gauge for how far one has been detached from their natural intuition and senses. If you feel the urge to yell "GRAVITY!!" at the screen while watching this video...it means your natural intuition has been shut down, and replaced with NASA Scientism propaganda designed to detach you from the sacred knowledge of where you are, and therefore WHO you are. Your eyes and God-given senses do not deceive you. The controllers of our world—who are fueled by your confusion—are deceiving you.

@99miles2go @skdh @anika_climate How long does the average water molecule last in this atmosphere? How long does the average CO2 molecule?

Both water and carbon dioxide are cyclical. Why can one be forced but not the other ? Irrigation, high altitude flight (water sticks around much longer in the stratosphere), more surface area thanks to dams and pools, and combustion all force higher amounts of water into the atmosphere. And it is significantly more powerful at retaining heat than CO2. But it does not have the political sex appeal as CO2, which can be used to attack capitalism.

🚨CLIMATE SCIENTIST ANSWERS PUBLIC QUESTIONS! Q: “Isn’t Carbon Dioxide a dangerous greenhouse gas?”, A: “This is another common misconception, it only comprises 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere…”

@SILVERisMoneey Meanwhile, x.com/i/status/17358…

There is absolutely 0 exclusive globe earth proof. Everyone who thinks the earths a ball just trusts the experts and appeals to authorities/bandwaggon… that’s why it triggers people so much because they have to admit they were wrong and they got fooled

@NotEvolution1 "Have been calculated" by someone who didn't know enough probability.

Don’t have enough faith to be atheist

@GreyGhost000 @AshtonForbes I didn't say you shot it.

@gomiam @AshtonForbes I did laugh. I didn’t shoot this

You've probably heard that wormholes would require the mass of Jupiter to produce. That is wrong. We can bring down the energy requirement to an arbitrarily small amount. Tonight I'll explain how with the help of Sonny White's 2014 lecture. youtube.com/live/Vc2mxc8Fu…

@Echo_nomics @CultOfNoMeaning @darwintojesus Does it?

@CultOfNoMeaning @darwintojesus So if marrying kids stabilises society we can agree on it and legalise it?

Who said atheists have no drip?

@Thevine_ntwk @sola_chad In other words, your knowledge about evolution is lacking and so is your knowledge about mathematics.

@sola_chad The truth they won't show you is that the theory of evolution is mathematically impossible. Like there is absolutely no way! My question is, if evolution is true why did it end with the early humans, why haven't any ape evolved again over the last 100 generations?

Which one should be taught in schools?

@James428442 @QuantumTumbler The Allais Anomaly hasn't been confirmed yet: different experiments provide different results, and it seems to result from environmental conditions.

Except they are literally potential. RHIC STAR collider data proves my Vacuum excitation origin VEO framework. << matter from the vacuum, not a dense singularity big bang , no inflation. matches CMB blackbody uniformity, explains Axis of evil as the birthmark of the universe, not a statistical fluke. Which with my wave driven cosmology WDC framework forms The substrate pressure-gradient system SPGS. They are potential, as potentially with the correct variables they become real. Virtual means something else entirely. The Allais Anomaly, Cavendish Experiment orbital eccentricities, pioneer drag/acceleration ( unexplained) and the photon problem have also been used to prove that light has a pseudo-mass and pseudo-pressure effect. This new creates a localized effect that addresses all the localized inconsistencies with gravity. I am still checking my math, but if correct, the Lambda-CDM is Falsified mathematically due Occam's razor. I have also resolved the uncertainty principle. The slime mould and other animal navigation is my proof that our "advanced" senses are actually getting in the way. Life utilizes these same pressure gradients for navigation, but "advanced" neural evolution has created a sensory decoupling. ​The Slime Mould (Direct Coupling): Organisms like Physarum polycephalum lack a centralized brain filter. They sense the substrate Back-Reaction directly. When a pseudopod enters a "dead end," the nodal saturation (1/137) increases, creating a physical pressure resistance. The organism "feels" the dead end before it arrives because it is sensing the Gradient Impedance. ​The 18.1% Chiral Glide: The slime mould solves mazes by following the Path of Least Resistance (PLR). It is literally "pushed" by the 18.1% non-local grain into the most efficient topological route. ​Sensory Decoupling (The Brain Trade-off): Higher organisms (humans) developed eyes and ears to process high-frequency electromagnetic and acoustic data. This required the brain to "gate" or filter out the low-frequency background pressure of the substrate. We gained "vision" but lost the Direct Pressure Sensitivity that allows simpler life to navigate the 1/137 lattice with perfect efficiency. Small samples of my upcoming peer review.

People keep mixing two completely different ideas and acting like they’re the same thing. They’re not. When physicists talk about the universe in “holographic” terms, they’re not saying reality is fake or projected like some sci-fi movie. They’re describing a very specific constraint that came out of studying black holes. The math shows that the amount of information you can pack into a region of space depends on the surface around it, not the volume inside it. That’s weird, but it’s precise. It’s tied to equations, to entropy, to real attempts at making gravity and quantum theory fit together. Nothing about that requires a hidden computer or some external system running everything. It’s just a statement about how information behaves in our universe. The simulation idea is something else entirely. It says reality itself is being generated by something outside of it, like we’re inside a program. But once you say that, you’ve stepped out of physics. There’s no defined mechanism for how this “outside system” connects to what we observe, no way to measure it, and no condition where you could prove it wrong. Every possible observation just gets folded back into the claim. At that point, you’re not explaining anything anymore. You’re just renaming reality. That doesn’t automatically make it false, but it does mean it’s not doing the same kind of work as a physical theory. One gives you constraints you can test and push against. The other can absorb anything you throw at it without ever breaking. And that’s the line people keep ignoring. Calling the universe “a hologram” is about how information is structured within physics. Saying we’re “in a simulation” is a philosophical guess about what might exist beyond it. Those are not interchangeable ideas, and treating them like they are doesn’t make the conversation deeper. It just blurs the difference between something you can actually test and something you can’t.

@tardfarts @AJamesMcCarthy @grok Photons

@AJamesMcCarthy @grok Telescopes suck

This is pretty much exactly how it looks through a big telescope btw

@kelenthir @AJamesMcCarthy

@AJamesMcCarthy Damn… so we need a bigger Spaceship!

@GreyGhost000 @AshtonForbes It works by focusing, setting the exposure time (and ISO) right and avoiding internal reflections.

@AshtonForbes So this was in my backyard. How does this work. 2021. My original one was Aug 31 2013.

@quoin1776 @GeoeWatchDebunk @redpillb0t Personal incredulity is a fallacious argument.

@GeoeWatchDebunk @redpillb0t Uh huh, sure thing punkin

Still don't believe they are spraying you with chemtrails? Then let a Geoengineer tell you how they do it.

@Earth_isa_Plane You are either a poor architect or not at all. Do you account for gravity?

I'm an Architect & agree with this surveyor. Surveyors don't allow for curvature because there isn't any. The earth is a level plane & all of construction & CAD software is based on Euclidean geometry 🙂

@SamuelJenkis @GeoeWatchDebunk @sayerjigmi @Dennis_Kucinich "Everything I don't like is 'bot'"

@SamuelJenkis @GeoeWatchDebunk @sayerjigmi @Dennis_Kucinich You lack evidence, like everybody claiming chemtrails exist.

1/🚨 25 years ago Congressman Dennis Kucinich named the prohibition of 'Chemtrails' and other 'exotic weapons systems' into law (H.R. 2977) 10 years ago the DNC put my 'Chemtrail Conspiracy' research on a joke list. Today it's on the front page of the Daily Mail. This is the full arc — and it's not over. 🧵👇

@forocoches El retraso no es el problema, es que no funciona.

@314oPi @forocoches Sí, usar términos técnicos poco entendidos es una treta común de los estafadores que se hacen pasar por gurús de la salud.

@gomiam @forocoches Tiene razón no me refería a la vinculado a la biología o neurología que están avaladas académicamente. Me refería a la charlatanería que abunda en la redes usurpando el término y que vale para todo desde resolver un conflicto a explicar la teoría de cuerdas,sin un sólo calculo

Nueva TEORÍA CIENTÍFICA DICE QUE LA CONCIENCIA SOBREVIVE A LA MUERTE Una nueva propuesta teórica intenta conectar física cuántica, cosmología y filosofía para abordar uno de los mayores misterios científicos: la naturaleza de la conciencia. La conciencia humana sigue siendo uno de los grandes enigmas de la ciencia. A pesar de los enormes avances en neurociencia y física, aún no existe una explicación definitiva sobre qué es exactamente la conciencia ni cómo surge. forocoches.com/foro/showthrea…

@Ivo_Miliciano @forocoches El pensamiento resulta de la actividad cerebral.

@forocoches La consciencia es producto de un ser inteligente con pensamiento critico Al no haber pensamiento no hay consciencia Disfruten que se acaba

@314oPi @forocoches La neurociencia estudia la química y física del cerebro. Quizá no sea mecánica cuántica pero tampoco es pseudociencia. ¿La has confundido quizá con la psicología? Que cada vez lo es menos pero ha tenido que quitarse de encima mucha pseudociencia.

@forocoches La neurociencia no tiene nada que ver con la física ,es una pseudociencia. Charlatanería artificial ,que no requiere esfuerzo empírico ni teórico,sólo blablabla. La cuantica va de probabilidad de estados y es incompatible con el espacio tiempo relativista de momento.

@TJTS_book @darwintojesus "Purely random" because you don't understand statistics.

@darwintojesus 🔸Atheism actually aligns with God’s master plan, as it keeps belief in His existence grounded in faith alone. Science - restricted to empirical methods - cannot prove purely random creation, nor can it disprove Intelligent Design🔸

Atheism is about rebellion, not evidence.