That Horse

We have the audio from Justin's calls to the police, in the #Fitzsimmons case, let's listen to what Justin actually told the cops. I think this is a first they are being played, thanks to the wonder mod. youtube.com/live/LkrGwzvy8… via @YouTube

@auntiedebbb @TCWK121713 I'll take Kristy over Jim any day. 🤣😂

So I've been hearing over the last few days that @Lawferio was allegedly offered a @CourtTV contract and she allegedly turned them down. There is no way that is true. Here's why. Last year, during the second Karen Read trial, I was invited and almost went on a show to talk about the case. I then found out that Nan was going to be on that same show. Knowing nothing about her, and having never heard of her, I decided to go read some of her tweets and watch some of the footage where she was on that show. You know, to get a feel for what I'm getting myself into. When I say this lady is mental, that's an understatement. She likes to make outlandish claims, exaggerates constantly, and has no decency or decorum when it comes to the truth or how she presents herself. When she found out that I was going to be a guest on that show, she even tweeted and tagged me about how 'excited' she was to 'meet me' in a way to coax me into the show in a very creepy way. When I read Chandler her tweet, she was as much appalled as I was. As a direct result of her conduct and what I learned about her as a personality, I cancelled my appearance on that show. Although for reasons that escape me, my photo was still on the thumbnail -- probably to bolster the show's views. But, I'm not mad. If my image brought a few extra viewers to your show, God bless you. Enjoy. But Nan has some real issues that need to be looked into. I don't know what they are, as I'm not a psychologist. But if you have watched even 5 minutes of her taking about anything, you know what I mean. Notwithstanding, there is NO way that @CourtTV aka @LawCrimeNetwork (for those of you who don't know, L&C just bought them and now own them as of 2/6/26) would fire the likes of Julie Grant, an obviously fake pretends-she's-a-good-attorney-but-is-nothing-but-a-shill who attacks victims of the justice system for her own sycophantic pleasure, only to replace her with a lobster. They fired Julie to improve the channel's ratings and credibility. Why would they hire Nan to significantly undermine that now? It makes zero logical sense and is most likely false. More than likely, this stunt Nan pulled is just another way for her to try and play how 'cool' she is that she is being offered the newly opened position, only to turn them down (because she so much better than that) in an attempt to boast whatever is left of her reputation and that's abhorrent. Anyway, that's my opinion and mine alone based on data I've gathered about Nan over the past 12 months since I found out she exists. /end rant