Zach Bumgardner

@AmyLove91172704 @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz Optimal play saves everyone. That is the goal. Again you save noone picking blue on first choice. And you risk yourself. You introduced the risk. So second understanding that should also pick red because they can infer the first choice. And so on and so forth.

@ZBumThrows @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz Yes. I am not the system, but I am of it. Protecting myself is not the ultimate goal here

Am I high why are people saying red when picking blue saves everyone

@AmyLove91172704 @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz You dont have to choose blue. Thats why you introduce risk as the first blue player. You have the equilibrium directly backwards. You can infer all prior optimal paths from the first scenario and how that applies to the second. Blue exposes.

@ZBumThrows @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz You do not understand. The blue player is *exposed* to the risk created by the first red. This is just the way it works. Being exposed to risk, bring vulnerable, is not the same as creating risk.

@AmyLove91172704 @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz Risk does not mean outcome. The risk is the chance someone has to die. There is no risk if you pick red first. Becausr you protect yourself. The second person introduces risk if they choose blue. Its the first blue choice that changes the game.

@ZBumThrows @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz I genuinely do not grasp your line of reasoning. If my first choice is blue, and the second choice is blue, there is no hypothetical risk. If 1 is R, and 2 is B, theres risk. And if 1&2 are R, theres hypothetical risk.

@AmyLove91172704 @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz In what way? You save noone by picking blue (there are no other blues). You only “taint the system” by picking blue. You create the scenario where someone is at risk. Red is the objective moral first choice, because you put no onus on anyone else to save you and risk no one.

@ZBumThrows @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz No. If I am the first in the booth, and I push red, I have tained the entite system for all other agents

@AdequateEmily You are the first person in the booth to pick. What do you pick? If you pick blue you saved no one and put yourself at risk . You introduced risk into the equation. Optimal to pick red. Now, you go second, you can infer first pick is red from reasoning above. Why introduce risk?

@AmyLove91172704 @dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz Imagine you are the first person to step into the booth to press the button. Pressing red does not create risk, no one is at risk and you chose the option that creates no risk to yourself. If you choose blue, risk is now placed in the system by further actions. Blue is the risk.

@dreamwaterzoo @realDareGames @ribasoka0 @vyrolious @Yatoplayz No. Risk exposure only occurs after the introduction of red presses into the system. Blue inherently does nothing.

@AdamArchuleta Rebounds are magical, but ive seen a lot of poor rebounds that lose position because they didnt prepare with the altitudes, extreme isometrics, and high volume and high timed sets. Dudes that skip position miss the potential in the protocols.

The magic is in the catch. How hard and how fast can you MEET the bar on the way BACK UP. There should be no sinking at the bottom! Does it hurt your hands? Yes.. Good thing the body can adapt beautifully!! Absorbing Force is the name of the game!

@GodstimeAtas It is not a transactional relationship.

What's the need of giving your life to Jesus if Satan can still attack you. I thought salvation in Christ is supposed to protect you from satanic attack?

@QuincyAvery Christ did judge. He just didnt stop trying to reach and save the unrighteous.

So if Jesus is the focus why do Christians spend so much energy condemning things that aren’t the focus. Jesus didn’t judge but I see so many Christians full of so much judgement. Doesn’t track for me.

@combatmedic There was an episode of the show king of the hill about a texan family that talked about the concept of wabi sabi. Its out there even if not formally named by the people.

この、一見ボロに見えるトラック画像に対する、アメリカの兄貴達（南部が多いのだろうか？）の反応が、大変に興味深い。ボディの錆の一つ一つが持つ、時間の流れに価値を見出している気がするのだ。 彼らなら、日本の「禅」とか、「侘び寂び」の文化とか、本質的な所で共感してくれそうな気がするな。

@seedyoulater If you havent look into the Appalachian moonshine culture.

リプライ全部は追えてないけど、ケンタッキーの人達って本当に自分たちの州のバーボンに誇りを持ってるんだなあって伝わってくるよ

@HirotarouButani @Corbienest We get it over here and ive settled on personal preference is best. If you prefer dubbed media and thats how you are going to experience enjoyably, do it.

@Corbienest 昔は議論してましたね。そして、圧倒的に「原語派」が優勢でした。 今はそこまでの拘り（価値観の対立）は無い。 　出来れば両方の言語を楽しんで、翻訳（ニュアンス）の差を味わう（このセリフ、そう解釈できるんだ！的な）のがモアベターと思うようになったよ。

Japan! When you watch an American movie do you argue with your friends about which is the superior experience: dubbed or subtitled?

@nanshisweets Yes

日本語の投稿がアメリカの人に翻訳なしで届くようになったって本当ですか！？みなさん、サンクスギビングデーに本当にパンプキンパイを食べているのか、日本語で質問できるってことですか！？

@razorfist Nah things change. We can push forward.

Don't look up the historical reason there are so few Christians in Japan. If you want to keep this whole East/West love-in going, I mean.

@AdamArchuleta The emphasis on actively pulling into position and not just waiting on the concentric is huge. Im curious if you would share some of your programs you ran there sometime?

I helped coach high school football for a few years and ran the speed/strength program for one of them. It was a tremendous experience, and I learned a lot about the art of teaching and motivating young people. Here’s what I took away from that time, and my thoughts on the weight room and how you can use it to help you on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday nights. Honestly, I don’t think a lot of coaches fully understand this side of it. This bench press is a great example. Most guys just focus on completing the rep. But what about the details? - Feet flat on the ground and not moving around - Glutes tight with maximum tension - Actively pulling the bar down, not just letting gravity lower it - Head flat on the bench, chin tucked into your chest - Proper spotting technique - Elbows in and not flared out Just to name a few… The question I ask the kids (and coaches) all the time is this: If you can’t focus on all the little details in the weight room, especially when you’re tired, then how can we trust you to execute your technique on 4th & 1 late in the 4th quarter? Coaches are missing out on a tremendous teaching opportunity with their players if they really understood what the weight room can help develop. Details always matter. Not being critical, just using this as an example to make a point.

@T_Cortazzo The point you made leads to that conclusion because thats what it demonstrates mathematically. Even here you are presenting two wildly different scenarios. Do 3 days, 3 days, or 6 days work. You havent addressed the flaws because you are showing a different principle.

I get what you’re arguing but my point isn’t that “more prep is better.” My point is that “NO CONDITIONING” is as flawed as “NO SPEED TRAINING.” They are both dumb theories. I also don’t think you can make gains exponentially by X% as simple as I made it sound in the video. Hence why I’m saying it’s not real life. In my example: Speed Training 3X/week = 10% improvement Conditioning 3X/week = 10% improvement Doing both together would yield 20% total change overall, assuming this was even a possibility (it’s not, because that’s not how it works).

What if we took the same “NO CONDITIONING” Theory… and we flipped it upside down 🙃 What if we did “NO SPEED TRAINING” and ONLY did conditioning in training?

@T_Cortazzo Of course you can. Im disagreeing with your argument to get there in this case because you are comparing a theoretical situation where you are increasing a fitness quality by 10% vs a situation where you increase total preparation is +21%. You showed more prep is better. Duh.

Again, this isn’t real life. And with me keeping it this simple and not including opportunity cost & time constraints, it’s fair for you to make that argument. I’ll gladly make a separate video talking about opportunity cost & constraints. With that said, speed training & conditioning can co-exist to the point where we can maximize potential in both qualities (or at least work towards maximizing each, even if we don’t get there). Manipulating volumes & intensities through programming + adequate recovery time is the key. That’s done through solid programming and solid communication with the athlete. You can properly train someone to get faster WHILE also using conditioning principles to support an athlete’s needs. Don’t take away from one thing because of burying the athlete - but at the same time it’s important to train all qualities & capacities that can keep an athlete healthy and help them improve in their sport.

@BrettKollmann @Nate_Tice I like the wider hashes for the difference in gameplay it creates. 3 yard rule needs to go.

@Nate_Tice OL development won't improve in FBS/FCS until college football gets rid of the 3-yard rule for RPOs and narrows the hashes.

I dread the thought of trying to find more NFL-caliber offensive linemen